+44 203 318 3300 +61 2 7908 3995 help@nativeassignmenthelp.co.uk

Pages: 49

Words: 12234

Research Methodology Phenomenological Research For The Music Streaming Service

 Introduction - Research Methodology Phenomenological Research For The Music Streaming Service

Access Approving Samples Written by Our Top-Notch Subject Experts When Seeking Assignment Help Online in UK.

The topic of this research is “Phenomenological research for the music streaming service: are artists getting paid what they deserve?” the research is based on primary research which is mainly based on the in-depth interview and review of secondary research papers regarding this topic. The researcher establishes the interview face-to-face and another different online interview process to gather data for this research. Significant research results have come from qualitative assessment in a variety of scientific areas. This has been effective in exposing certain of the most egregious positivistic misconceptions about science and humanity. By uncovering the deficiencies of the prevailing quantitative examination worldview in understanding peculiarities, for example, wellbeing and ailment, it has acquired authenticity inside the venture of delivering logical information — regardless of whether it stays on the fringe with regards to strategy choices and positioning clear exploration results. Qualitative research depends on the interpretive and constructivist points of view, intending to understand a review subject instead of foreseeing ends, just like with positivist examination. Interpretive attempts to secure information through fathoming people’s particular perspectives and the significance related to those perspectives. Constructivism believes the information to be fabricated when individuals attempt to get a handle on their encounters. Generally, subjective examination focuses on individuals’ lived encounters and is inherently abstract and defenceless to the two analysts’ and members’ inclinations. While subjectivity is viewed as a critical shortcoming by positivists, it addresses the fundamental worth of subjective exploration and the interpretive/constructivist ideal models. At the point when gotten along nicely, the subjective examination is inside predictable and exhaustive, and it assists us with addressing basic inquiries regarding individuals and their lives. Before arranging and carrying out subjective analysis, these fundamental epistemological underpinnings should be laid out. 

Specialists that embrace different sorts of examination undertakings might find it hard to pick a subjective exploration method for their work. The truth of the matter is that it isn’t the number of subjective exploration philosophies accessible, however, which one is adaptable and "member situated" enough to get to the valid "educational encounters" of the review members (Feyaerts et al. 2021). It is essential to upgrade the approach of research methodology used in conducting the thesis to help illuminate and direct new specialists to a more complete subjective systemic practice, The Phenomenological approach, is an aide for some new and beginner scientists who are keen on leading exploration projects in the accompanying disciplines; training, social science, brain science, political theory, humanities, financial matters, etc (Frechette et al. 2020). In this study, the researcher will watch the participants, conduct an in-depth interview, and gather data from the individuals via audio recordings. The participants are chosen based on their surroundings since all of the participants in this phenomenological study are from the music business. Face-to-face interviews with participants are conducted both offline and online. In the offline mode, the researcher interviews 10 to 15 persons from the music business in person, whereas in the online mode, the researcher interviews participants using different video conferencing software such as Skype, MS team, Zoom interviews, and so on. In the chapter, the methodology of phenomenology has been discussed in this chapter. Throughout the chapter, the approach of the research has been discussed, The rationale behind the selection of the phenomenological research has been discussed, and the aim and objectives of the phenomenological research are also mentioned in this chapter, The research methodology design where the recruitment process selection criteria of the selection of participants, and how to gain access to the participants discussed. In the data management section, the data collection process, data analysis, and data measurement and scaling have been discussed. The next section of this methodology chapter is a phenomenological research interview where the process of the interview has been discussed, In this research, the primary data has been collected through in-depth interviews. The justification for using the in-depth interview in this research along with the challenges faced by the researcher in the in-depth interview is also discussed in the chapter.

4.2 Qualitative research Approach

It is essential to upgrade the approach of research methodology used in conducting the thesis to help illuminate and direct new specialists to a more complete subjective systemic practice, The Phenomenological approach, is an aide for some new and beginner scientists who are keen on leading exploration projects in the accompanying disciplines; training, social science, brain science, political theory, humanities, financial matters, etc. Qualitative research explores and appreciates the understandings that people put into their encounters. The subjective exploration intends to reveal insight into ideas that are some way or another more subtle. They likewise need to investigate the intricacy of social reality. These are inductive and have shared characteristics in that they examine ‘why,’ ‘what,’ and ‘how’ requests, as opposed to ‘the number of’ and ‘how much’ ones leaned toward by quantitative examination. Moreover, a subjective report is expected to investigate an individual’s lived circumstances and dodge quantitative distractions with estimation, computing, and foreseeing for communicating, researching, grasping, and understanding how a peculiarity happens (Indriani and Atiaturrahmaniah 2019). Subjective procedures have different and particular epistemological bases, yet they cross over in the system of how important are made. Scientists attempt to examine objects in their regular habitats and figure out or decipher the implications of people characteristic to their encounters in regular language. The subjective request is recognized by its experiential handle of the mind-boggling interrelationships among peculiarities and its immediate understanding of happenings (Ahmed and Asraf 2018). Thus, the accentuation is on finding examples of surprising and anticipated joins in cases or occasions. Analysts do this by utilizing their emotional judgment while exhibiting what their suspicions mean for the information got through private reflexivity as self-investigation and self-assessment all through research.

Figure 1: phenomenological research

Moreover, subjective exploration intends to get a handle on the members’ inside perspectives from actual members. Accordingly, it is emic and idiographic. The information assortment is not set in stone by the review subjects. Inductive information investigation is utilized to comprehend the implications that people attribute to their encounters (Johnson et al. 2020). Moreover, the interpretive idea of the methodology permits the specialist to evoke bits of knowledge from respondents by utilizing interest, receptiveness, compassion, and adaptability to pay attention to individuals portraying their accounts in their regular settings to recognize how their encounters and ways of behaving are formed by the setting of their social, social, monetary, and verifiable universes. Moreover, subjective exploration might be utilized to research less popular or less-comprehended subjects or peculiarities to expose unforeseen information (Miller et al. 2018). Moreover, the procedure is fitting when a definite inside and out perspective on peculiarities is expected to examine a muddled interaction and give light on the different personalities of the human experience. The method enjoys four significant benefits that help its more extensive use, especially in concentrating on fields where pertinent speculations and going before concentrating on exist to determine essential hypothetical examples.

  • Trying various types of data from the obtained information to some hypothetical idea could work on the inner legitimacy of contextual investigations. Researchers should make an extensive hypothetical structure in light of ebb and flow studies to contrast a projected hypothetical example and a noticed experimental example (Basias and Pollalis 2018). The underlying system and correlation make a causal connection and lead to the development of recognizable examples from procured information.
  • The association of thoughts and perceptions in flexible example matching permits perusers to understand the analysis manners of thinking from conceptualization to information translation. A b calculated establishment toward the start of the text fills in as a guide for information examination and enunciation of the discoveries. This is because of the way that it empowers the scientist to move past a basic show of various observational discoveries.
  • The similitudes and contrasts among hypothetical and noticed designs, as well as the development of unexpected examples, give a structure for the specialist to conjecture about the discoveries (Bouncke et al. 2021). While confound between the two arrangements of examples might have all the earmarks of being a “shortcoming,” it is an opportunity to refresh or grow existing hypotheses or start the conjecturing system towards another hypothesis.
  • The method functions admirably for catching classes for examination. A careful or semi-methodical investigation of the pertinent writing helps specialists in thinking deduced. At the end of the day, analysts can direct psychological studies relying upon what they foresee the noticed examples to be founded on current writing. This deduced structure likewise incorporates an information examination language that frames the bearing of exploration while considering developing subjects from cases and information.
  • The versatile example matching strategy holds extraordinary potential in longitudinal and additionally single-case examinations. As hypothetical understanding, deduced designs give material for replication and examination, and subsequently comprise major areas of strength for to gather bits of knowledge from a solitary occasion.

Figure 2: Research onion

(Source: https://jfsdigital.org.net)

4.3 Rationale to phenomenology research

Phenomenology is a methodology created by Martin Heidegger that tries to examine living human encounters and how objects are viewed and seem to awareness. Edmund Husserl developed this approach. Throughout the latter decades of the 20th century, phenomenology grew into a reasonably advanced qualitative research approach, owing primarily to a seismic transition from mostly deductive research to inductive inquiry. Phenomenology is gaining popularity in the realms of professional and public activity, such as education, nursing, social work, and psychology (Nicholls 2019). As in any antagonistic (antagonist) undertaking, the point that consumes numerous subjective and quantitative examination system analysts is whether the approach can make enduring, dependable, and transferrable exploration discoveries. Subsequently, the two methodologies (subjective and quantitative) are in a “rivalry” to see whose procedure can give the most pompous exploration yields. In a few scholarly subjects, “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)” has arisen as an overwhelming subjective examination worldview (Imanzadeh 2018). Its accentuation on encountering union and uniqueness, as well as its point of assessing profound and nuanced investigation of the genuine encounters of a predetermined number of members. IPA attempts to understand lived insight by consolidating the compositions of four noticeable phenomenological rationalists: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger, and Sartre. One of the most eminent parts of IPA is its broad and thorough assessment of awareness. Specialists, similar to Husserl, endeavor to catch people’s impressions of peculiarities by organizing their earlier information. Though much attention has led to the growth of this approach, there is little agreement on what defines the technique. There have been heated discussions over the best techniques to do phenomenological research. Notwithstanding, there are two fundamental sorts to consider: clear and hermeneutic. These stick to Husserl’s and Heidegger’s wide philosophical practices, separately. 

The unmistakable phenomenological approach’s overall objective is to examine the substance or design of occasions as they happen to our mindfulness. Thus, portrayals of the encounters are immovably connected to the proof, with no impact from any outer hypothesis (Churchill 2018). This procedure is established on Husserl’s phenomenological reasoning, which incorporates the thoughts of epoché, deliberate investigation, and eidetic decrease. Just communicated, the scientist should embrace a phenomenological outlook and put away earlier information or presuppositions.

The thoughts from the hermeneutic or interpretive methodology, which is established on the rules that decrease is unthinkable and subsequently dismisses suspending individual convictions for the understanding of occasions, are a sensational disparity from the previous. Accordingly, research discoveries are implanted with philosophical, hypothetical, scholarly, and interpretive focal points, yielding a part of human experience in light of vast creative mind and allegorical awareness (McNarry et al. 2019). Different phenomenologically affected research procedures range from unadulterated depiction to understanding. In any case, there is a more ebb and flow way to deal with undertaking phenomenological research. It is particularly engaging as a result of its devotion to examining, portraying, deciphering, and arranging the members’ sense-production of their encounters. 

There are a few information logical techniques that scientists could use for information examination in a subjective exploration philosophy. These scientific systems incorporate the Narrative methodology, Grounded Theory approach, Ethnographic methodology, Case Study approach, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach, and others. The overall inductive method has been characterized as a subjective exploration custom equipped for dissecting crude information to the evaluators’ points (specialists). The inductive methodology’s significant objective is to permit research discoveries to emerge from the regular, ruling, or imperative subjects intrinsic in crude information, liberated from the requirements forced by coordinated approaches (Errasti?Ibarrondo et al. 2018). To examine the subjective information, the old inductive procedure was used to find subjects in the text information that were connected to the evaluation goals. 

Subsequently, the overall inductive procedure is “sans objective” investigation, which permits specialists to decipher their outcomes from crude information got as long as current realities (discoveries) are pertinent to the evaluator’s motivation and objective (analyst). As great and beautiful as the overall inductive strategy might show up, the phenomenological research approach gives an undeniably more definite information gathering and investigation methodology than the overall inductive methodology (Umanailo 2019). Notwithstanding, phenomenology tries to track down the implying that exists inside experience and to communicate detected information through language. Phenomenology is a system that deciphers a firm story or story about the review members’ encounters. This is where the two subjective practices veer, since, not at all like the phenomenological research custom, the overall inductive strategy is more cantered on finding subjects and classes in the information gathered that are significant and adjust to the analyst’s points (Morrell-Scott 2018). The phenomenological method will give definite depictions and translations of the exploration members’ ‘experienced encounters’ corresponding to what the peculiarities being inspected have meant for the examination members’. 

Phenomenology considers participants' meaning production to be the most important aspect of their experience. The most important phenomenological outcomes are knowledge of phenomena from the perspectives of persons who have experienced them. Phenomenological research assumes that collective experience has an essence or essence (Khadem et al. 2022). A phenomenology inquiry seeks to find and explain the essence of people's cognitive processes in connection to some collective experience. As a result, the outcome of phenomenological research is a statement that embodies the essence of the incident.

4.3.1Aim and Objective of the phenomenology research

This phenomenology research paper aims to find the specific phenomena of about the payment pattern of the artist in the music industry.

The objectives of phenomenology research are mentioned below:

  • To explore the experience of the artist in the music industry individually.
  • To find a specific pattern of the payment method of the artists to know their desire.
  • To gain an intimate and close familiarity with the given team of individuals and their participation through the intense participation in the research topic in their comfortable environment.
  • To elicit the experiences, perceptions, feelings, and thoughts of the participants in the interview process.
  • To examine various experiences, perceptions, feelings, and thoughts among different participants in the interview process.

4.4 Research methodology design

The design of phenomenology research is different from basic qualitative research design. It is a distinct qualitative research process that discovers the underlying truth and shared structure of social phenomena. Phenomenology views participants’ meaning creation as the central component of the participant's experience (Suddick et al. 2021). The most significant phenomenological results are knowledge of phenomena as viewed from the views of participants who have experienced this. The presupposition of phenomenological investigation is that collective experience has an essence or essence. The goal of a phenomenology investigation is to discover and explain the core essence of the individuals' cognitive processes in relation to some collective experience. As a result, the end result of a phenomenological investigation is a statement that captures the essential nature of the occurrence (Mabogo, 2019). In this research, the researcher will observe the participants and there will be an in-depth interview process and the data of the participants will be collected through audio recordings. The selection of the participants is based on the environment such as all the participants of this phenomenological research are from the music industry. There is both face-to-face interviews with the participants through both offline and online modes. For offline mode, the researcher personally meets 10 to 15 people from the music industry to interview them and for the online interview the researcher interviews participants through various video conferencing applications such as Skype, MS team, zoom interviews, etc.

4.4.1 Recruitment Procedures

A recruitment plan is a formal plan that specifies a recruitment technique, Recruitment size, and recruitment strategy. A qualitative sample strategy specifies the number of inspections, interviews, focus group interviews, or instances required to guarantee that the results provide rich data. The recruitment strategy, including recruitment size, is planned in depth in advance in the qualitative research, whereas qualitative research initiatives begin with a vaguely defined recruitment plan (Hamilton, 2020). To acquire rich data, the researcher may utilize this approach to incorporate a range of locations and scenarios, as well as a diverse range of individuals, including unfavorable or severe occurrences. For this purpose, here online interview has been conducted to get greater number of participant from the music industry.

The following are the main characteristics of a qualitative recruitment plan. To begin, respondents are always purposefully sampled. Second, the population size varies with every research and is often modest. Third, the recruitment will develop throughout the research: based on additional issues generated in the data collecting and assessment process, exclusion and inclusion criteria may be revised, or recruitment sites may be modified. Finally, recruitment is defined mostly by conceptual needs rather than by representativeness. As a result, the researcher must offer an explanation and reason for the recruitment strategy decisions (Franz et al. 2019). When the specified people and surroundings are adequate to offer the knowledge required for a complete knowledge of the phenomena under research, the recruitment strategy is acceptable. Some practical considerations: A vital initial stage is to identify places and circumstances in which prospective participants might be found. The most effective technique is to seek out individuals who can offer the most detailed information. Such participants have to be aware of the issue, be competent to explain and reflect, as well as be eager to talk with the researcher in depth and at length (Rutakumwa et al. 2020). Furthermore, the researcher has to examine the sampling strategy regularly and make changes as needed.

Qualitative approaches sometimes depend on interviews involving a small number of people who have particular characteristics. These factors are determined by the researchers’ pre-defined eligibility criteria, which might include classic categories like gender, nationality, sexuality, or age, as well as more particular features and experiences relating to people’s professional or personal life. In general, researchers make selection criteria based on what they feel would best fit their research - in the notion that the chosen interview participants are thought to be one of those most equipped to offer information on the study issues (Surmiak, 2018). After defining the selection parameters, researchers have to discover appropriate study settings and engage possible informants. While some recruitment locations are open to all academics without requiring special authorization, others need formal or informal accommodations. In some situations, such authorization is readily available, but in others, researchers have to through a complicated bureaucratic structure before meeting with targeted participants.

When the different sampling requirements do not characterize an already established team - that is, when the sampling frame comprises individual persons who share a position, distinctive feature, or involvement but are not members of a particular organization or institution - scholars have more flexibility to encounter respondents straightforwardly, without express permission. Even though this gives researchers greater options, it does not always make recruiting informants simpler. Prospective witnesses have to still be found, addressed, and persuaded to cooperate, frequently by the scholar.

In all research studies, successful strategies for recruitment are vital for arriving at a satisfactory sample size. Many examinations incorporating people with dementia, in any case, select from dementia research focuses, hence tests may not be common for the entire dementia populace. Subsequently, while enlisting people with dementia, it very well may be useful to showcase the concentrate through a great many local area offices and settings to accomplish a satisfactory example. Others have found that structures (Jimenez et al. 2019). Utilizing different strategies and administrations to select might be particularly powerful in forestalling conceivable ‘over-research,’ which might emerge when specialists utilize similar focuses and thus draw in similar people. Customized enlisting strategies can incorporate systems, for example, primary data gatherings driven by applicable analysts and potential members from the music industry to get data about the review from specialist organizations they know about. In these examples, utilizing affable, non-specialized logical terminology is basic (Schnittker et al. 2018). Introductions conveyed by individuals from the exploration group to participants from music industry acculturate the review and can upgrade reaction since individuals 'know' who is endeavoring to enlist them. Employing dementia proponents to assist with the recruiting process could also be beneficial in attracting those with memory to not just organize informative meetings, but also to engage in the research.

4.4.2 Participants’ Selection Criteria

The practice of choosing or looking for circumstances, contexts, and/or people who produce rich information on the phenomena of concern is known as recruitment. In qualitative research, the researcher purposefully recruits rather than at random. Purposive recruitment, criteria recruitment, theoretical recruitment, convenience recruitment, and snowball recruitment are the most often used purposeful recruitment procedures. The ‘typical instances,’ ‘maximum variety,’ and ‘confirming and disconfirming’ recruitment procedures are sometimes utilized. Key informants have to be carefully selected for this research (Mirick and Wladkowski, 2019). Key sources have extraordinary and expert information on the point being scrutinized and are anxious to impart data and thoughts to you, the analyst. They likewise help in accessing members, which is exceptionally valuable while concentrating on gatherings. Moreover, as a specialist, you might contrast your contemplations and points of view with those of the key sources.

Phenomenology utilizes standard testing, which expects people to fulfill preset necessities. The main condition is the member’s earlier information on the peculiarities being scrutinized. The specialists look for volunteers who have shared an occasion however contrast in their qualities and remarkable encounters. For example, phenomenological research on the music streaming industry recruits participants from the music industry with different ages, educational backgrounds, life experiences, and different regions. Inspecting is additionally impacted by the highlights of the area, including access, time, member weakness, and various kinds of partners. Testing is additionally impacted by the elements of the area, including access, time, member weakness, and various kinds of partners (Archibald et al. 2019). The example climate is made sense of inside and out to offer a rich depiction of the unique circumstance, permitting the peruser to make an adaptability judgment. Testing likewise affects information investigation, as the researcher keeps on settling on conclusions about who or what situations to test straightaway. This depends on what the researcher accept is as yet missing to get the fundamental data for rich disclosures. Another center is the testing of “imperceptible gatherings” or burdened people. Test these individuals would require the utilization of a few inspecting methodologies, as well as extra time planned during the undertaking configuration stage for examining and enlisting. In the subjective examination, one directing thought is to enlist just until information immersion is reached. Information immersion alludes to the gathering of subjective information to the point that there is a feeling of conclusion since extra information offer copy data.

Information immersion happens when no new scientific data arises and the review conveys the most information about the peculiarity. Conversely, in the quantitative examination, the example size is chosen by a power computation (Gill and Baillie, 2018). The example size in subjective exploration is commonly little due to the information’s data wealth, the range of members (or different units), the broadness of the examination question and event, the information gathering technique (e.g., individual or gathering interviews), and the sort of testing procedure. For the most part, the examination group will conclude whether information immersion has been accomplished, and thusly if testing might be halted and the example size is sufficient. The accessibility of adequate top to bottom information showing the examples, characterizations, and variety of the peculiarities under research is the most essential condition (Puddephatt et al. 2020). Specialists analyze the investigations, ends, and the nature of the member citations assembled by the scientists before choosing if examining ought to be stopped because of information immersion. Generally speaking, analysts will lead a few additional perceptions, meetings, or center gathering conversations to lay out that information immersion has been reached.

Many research including phenomenological research look for variety among people. In any case, the meaning of the term assortment changed. As far as phenomenology, one creator recommended that the main required model is to pick individuals who have firsthand information on the peculiarities. Different creators, then again, accentuated exact determination measures to deliver assortment. These exact rules may be founded on past disclosures. Even though lower test sizes are a limitation of IPA examinations and are consequently frequently more diligently distributed, they consider a more extravagant profundity of investigation that would be prevented with a greater example. Recruitment of members, as well as the adaptability of discoveries, may be tricky comparable to the interesting determination standards. In any case, assuming the review account is adequately itemized and straightforward, and is enough applicable to current writing, the peruse ought to have the option to pass judgment and assess its propriety. The upside of having a particular example is that it permits you to gather detail on unambiguous gatherings that have shared specific encounters or on a similar example since the discoveries mirror a particular gathering and are not owing to differences in qualities like socio-segment boundaries. This is particularly significant while thinking about abnormal individuals, circumstances, or information-gathering strategies.

4.4.3 Gaining Access to the participant

There are several methods for contacting these ‘publicly available’ prospective participants. One strategy is to post written advertising in newspapers, on the internet, or to publish and circulate pamphlets in public places. Another strategy is to reach participants on in cafes, universities, streets, and neighborhoods, as well as in chat rooms and on websites (Barrett and Twycross, 2018). The direct technique requires that pre-defined recruiting parameters be determined from a physical aspect or closely tied to an action, appearance, or place to be effective. In this research for the music streaming industry, the researcher accesses the participants through online platforms and a face-to-face interview.

Snowball recruiting is another normal recruitment strategy. Snowball inspecting alludes to two unmistakable cycles. Snowball examining is a methodology utilized in open populace examination to evaluate shared communications in a specific populace (Amin et al. 2020). Snowball testing, then again, starts with a gathering (‘seeds’) from the hard-to-arrive local area who consequently help the specialist contact different respondents. At the point when we discuss snowball testing in this book, it is alluding to the second significance of the expression, regardless of whether the populaces in our exploration were easy to reach.

A mediator is also another well-known recruiting approach in qualitative interview investigations. As we define the word, a mediator is someone who utilizes his or her informal or formal status and ties to enable communication between a scholar and possible interviewees. In this study friends, family and colleague of the researcher act as a mediator to contact the participants and with the researchers. This job is commonly referred to as a gatekeeper in numerous circumstances (Liang et al. 2019). Because the gatekeeper is rarely regarded as a member of the group under investigation, but instead as somebody who provides or restricts entrance to this community, it is believed that the term mediator is much more descriptive of how participants are recruited (Meyer and Willis 2019). Something mediators and gatekeepers share is that they are either highly crucial in research, in the idea that they could greatly affect it - or at minimum create it much more or less successful.

4.5 Data Management

Constructivism has believed the information to be fabricated when individuals are attempted to get a handle on their encounters. The subjective examination has focused on individuals’ lived encounters and is inherently abstract and defenseless to the two analysts’ and members’ inclinations. While subjectivity is viewed as a critical shortcoming by positivists, it addresses the fundamental worth of subjective exploration and the interpretive/constructivist ideal models. At the point when gotten along nicely, the subjective examination is inside predictable and exhaustive, and it assists us with addressing basic inquiries regarding individuals and their lives. Before arranging and carrying out subjective analysis, these fundamental epistemological underpinnings should be laid out. In this data management, there are some key points which are elaborate below to analyze the data respectively.

4.5.1 Primary data collection

In this method to collect the data on Phenomenological research for the music streaming service, the second method will be implemented qualitatively. The research will be produced by primary data and the data will be collected from the interview of various music personnel. In the research process, primary data will be used because during the interview the data will be accessed easily. The primary data is found in various surveys which will provide lots of information about the context. At present, it is a very famous method that is known by all because primary access can provide a lot of information for free and paid research and the resources of those data can easily be accessed (Niyazi, 2018). Primary data is also the most rapidly used data collection method that is observing partners, interviews, and the focus on the particular group discussion. The observation of the member of the group is the method of data collection through the member who is involved in this method and also the group who is involved in that group discussion, and also the person who is getting their interview in these matters. 

Interviews are the most important data collection for primary data collection. Interviews are conducted in various types it might be telephonic or face to face or online interviews. But in this research, the researcher conducted an online interview method which happened on the zoom platform and face to face (Kaur, 2018). The main work in the interviews is the understand what the interviewees answer and collect the data according to their answers. It is very general in qualitative research to mix up more than one data collection method in one particular study. The qualitative data collection method is disorganized and flexible. The researcher can generally build decisions on data collection involved in the fieldwork, the referencing questions living with what, when, whom, where, and how. This is the most simple version of the data collection method and it also gives an overview of the most effective three big qualitative approaches and also most naturally used data collection methods. For the references in this research, Google scholar will be used that will provide the proper references according to the data. This method simplifies the process of collecting the data and the research must rely on this site for an authentic citation while collecting the information. 

This exploratory gathering furnishes a valuable chance to assemble entrust with the member, talk about moral worries, and finish up assent archives. Returning to the review subject at this underlying experience with the participant is additionally advantageous. This permits the individual to think about the occasion (YE??LYURT and Mustafa, 2019). By moving toward it as such, the scientist might get a more definite portrayal during the meeting without posing an excessive number of inquiries. The conventional counter-contention is that the interviewee will start to self-decipher the experience, and the record will lose its crude, unconstrained, and pre-intelligent personality. A preliminary gathering with an emphasis on individuals is accessible before the primary gathering. Ordinarily, such meetings occur about seven days before the researcher's gathering (Mabogo, 2019). This exploratory gathering furnishes a chance to assemble entrust with the member, examine moral worries, and finish up assent records. Returning to the review subject at this underlying experience with the participant is likewise valuable. This permits the individual to think about the occasion. By moving toward it thusly, the specialist might get a more definite portrayal during the meeting without posing an excessive number of inquiries. The conventional counter-contention is that the interviewee will start to self-decipher the experience, and the record will lose its crude, unconstrained, and pre-intelligent personality.

4.5.2 Data Analysis

The research is based on data analysis for phenomenology research of the design of musical Streaming research. The data is analyzed between sampling data collection and data analysis to accumulate data finding research. The observations and focus are prepared for the interview and group discussion. Well, instruction and transcripts are phenomenological theories, and content data analysis reflected in the interview is focused on group discussion experiences. In conversation analysis with verbal action of the musical streamlines in details are using formal transactions to facilitate analysis of the data research is an analysis to reflected details a using of the totality of the interview (Cerqueira, et al. 2021). The process of qualitative data to collect insights in the search for a deeper understanding of the analysis in this project. Analytical phenomenology is a different analytical approach that has different integration methods. In general, organizations is analysis begins to better used in one approach in describing the larger amount of data needed for collection are analysis.

The most important aspect of the group discussion is carefully rereading the transcripts in phenomenal data analysis taken given more data collection for audiotaped interviews. The methods are essences or core structures that were developed by some new experiences. These discussed in the research paper may be used as exploring some features and theories is thematic analysis. Phenomenological research is approached by understanding the universal essences of phenomenological research as possible through integrated analytical methods. Mostly emotions are unexpected analyses are inductive coding processes the coding sheet has collected preliminary and analysis order events and information are grouped into categories. Throughout the study of reflected some questions are did not see in the learning analysis recollected finding data participated together common managed by formulations finding some research set feet as fields reflect pattern a might analysis the moment of the research is analysis pattern and behaviors simultaneously. Qualitative research is designed all involves applied as content analysis produced a low to research involve descriptive phenomenon interpretation has content is analysis are patter among of themes (Morrell-Scott, 2018). The deductive analysis is data is operating theoretical frameworks are content is analysis use several as open finding and categories illustration are matrices with many patterns of the organizational comparing as one pattern. In phenomenological is analysis aim of descriptions and interpreted a meeting experiences common themes featuring that captured by other experts is analysis. The details all about are generated in a process that emerged from the data in a social musical streamlining paring elements and data from another source identified as commonalities. Decision-making about the assignment is identified some categories are qualities data analysis top providence as per research in making information with identified some steps are paring elements are finding generated a theory some processed in a social and phenomenological study. The all about is research on comparison categories in the final analysis with concept and pattern with websites supported. It is focused on research in some interviews related to hiring some participants for the research process. Then the truthers are assisted qualities of data analysis. 

4.5.3 Data measurement and scaling

There are two important types of data measurement scales first one is the Comparative scale, and the second one is the Non-Comparative scale. There are five types of Non-comparative data measurement scales. The scales are as follows; continuous rating scale, itemized rating scale, staple scale, semantic differential scale, and Liker scale. To measure the primary data the qualitative method has been implemented. To measure the scaling of the phenomenology for music streaming the non-comparative scale is effective to measure the payment of the artist. It is very important to pay the artist as they deserve to get the payment. In the ratio of the continuous rating scale, the musicians have to be implemented the phenomenology to make the structure of the team very b to operate (Cassol, et al. 2018). In the ratio of Itemized scale, the management has to take the order of events to provide the performance and make the artist famous by giving them the chance to sing. In the ratio of the Likert Scale, the artists have to perform for their fan following. It is necessary to provide the money which the artist deserves based on their performances and the craze of the artist. The consequences of unmistakable examination are now open. What a specialist should do is gather open information utilizing research devices like tests, polls, meetings, and even perception. The main role of enlightening exploration is to describe existing peculiarities methodically (Jackson, 2018). The details all about are generated in a process that emerged from the data in a social musical streamlining paring elements and data from another source identified as commonalities. Decision-making about the assignment is identified some categories are qualities data analysis top providence as per research in making information with identified some steps are paring elements are finding generated a theory some processed in a social and phenomenological study. The all about is research on comparison categories in the final analysis with concept and pattern with websites supported. It is focused on research in some interviews related to hiring some participants for the research process. In this research, the researcher has collected the primary data of the artists after taking the interview. In this qualitative research, the expression of existing peculiarities recognizes spellbinding examination from exploring the research, which inspects the existing peculiarities as well as peculiarities following a period of treatment to take the consequences of unmistakable and examine them properly in the needs of the researcher. In this research, the phenomenology has depended on the strategic musicians who have provided the desirable performances but did not get the appropriate payment they need. All the data has been collected from the face-to-face interview which is very effective to gather important data from it about the phenomenology of the music streaming service (Umanailo, 2019). A review, for instance, is frequently meant to concentrate on the perspectives of a wide populace on a specific occasion or subject. Information gathering is largely refined by the conveyance of surveys, while information handling requires evaluation. Relationship investigation incorporates quantitative information examination since it is planned to decide the coefficient connection record between two predominant factors. To gather the member's encounters, insights, thoughts, and sentiments, it shouldn't provide a lot of guidance, and try not to impact the reactions to match the perspective of the musicians.

4.6 Descriptive data analysis strategy

The clear examination is portrayed as a Descriptive approach used to describe existing events accurately. The expression "existing peculiarities" recognizes spellbinding examination from exploring research, which inspects existing peculiarities as well as peculiarities following a period of treatment. The consequences of unmistakable examination are now open. What a specialist should do is gather open information utilizing research devices like tests, polls, meetings, and even perception (Atmowardoyo, 2018). The main role of enlightening exploration is to describe existing peculiarities methodically. Descriptive research includes a few examinations drawn near, for example, overviews, relationship studies, subjective investigations, and content examination. These subtypes contrast not regarding information accessibility, but rather as far as information gathering and additionally examination processes. A review, for instance, is frequently meant to concentrate on the perspectives of a wide populace on a specific occasion or subject. Information gathering is largely refined by the conveyance of surveys, while information handling requires evaluation (Ashraf, 2019). Relationship investigation incorporates quantitative information examination since it is planned to decide the coefficient connection record between two predominant factors. The study is focused on participants of aggression and the relationship thoroughly using study data a musical streamlining strategies frameworks for phenomenological data analysis are showed strategies in the understanding of the significance in the music startling are the product is position implication of focusing market can make valuables by big data and startling changes are practices and preferences data analysis and social network are functions of music networking in doing thematic is analysis in phenomenology. The most field is market research was data analysis to interpreting application fields making sociology and market research in the development of products and services in the customers are requirements also help the business (Sundler, et al. 2019). Overall the phenomenology was researched to be difficult but can be a guide and wed based and data communication in music consumption and social networks are functioning networks. Stigmatic research is the variable association clouds effected holds traits and assignment dated research stills holds an effected to quality and still has been conducted the dated research an population of achieving in this proposal interpretation it is a participant is highly was presented to achieve is understanding purposes (Sundler, et al. 2019). Phenomenology focused on experiences that transformed appearances the research in descriptive phenomenology is directly current experiences are stimulations of their experiences. While precipitation is a part of the experiences art with surroundings also provided direction for this under-researched phenomenon. The present research was the relationship between the most common focused invasive standardized methods used to quickly assess. The data collection is analysis for description and markets industries were digital music streams of the new digital technology. Phenomenological approaches are the greatest streaming services in also market studies are conducted in qualities rises and developments and even this contribution. The results of its procedure are analysis interpretive phenomenological is truly moved beyond interpretations are services (Mihalache, 2019). Data analysis with understanding the identifying some statements in turn overall, convert into the phenomenological description in streamline as data analysis.

4.7 Phenomenological research interview

The interview has evolved into the primary method of data collecting in qualitative research. A qualitative technique, which means that his perspective on questioning is not necessarily consistent with interviews as it pertains to a certain approach, like the phenomenological research method. To reach the same robust standard as a natural scientific study, phenomenological research must be theoretically stated in such a way that data gathering and data interpretation are both understood as components of a common, integrated approach with an identical underlying scientific concept (Hutabarat and Simanjuntak, 2019). The questions in the phenomenological interview have to match the description requirements. In reality, in a formal meaning, the interviewer opens the interview by asking the respondent for a narrative of a circumstance wherein the interviewee has encountered the occurrence. The request for a setting is critical because the finding of the significance of phenomena (after the data processing) must be associated with a particular setting wherein the phenomenon was observed.

Some particular aspects must be established in an attempt to understand how data gathering and data processing are connected in descriptive phenomenological research (Thompson, 2018). The main challenge is most phenomenological researchers are concerned with other people's subjectivity, so it appears obvious that they would wish to gain characterization of these subjectivities. Gathering other people's observations is also an approach to uncovering a humanistic scientific interpretation of a given phenomenon.

4.7.1 In-depth interview

A qualitative research process that included an individual interview conducted intensively with small participants for exploring the perspectives of the participants on the particular program, idea, or situation is referred to as the in-depth interview. Such as the researcher may ask the interviewee about their experience in the music industry and its payment structure to explore the research objectives. When a detailed interview about any topic is needed such as the idea, or issue depth about a specific topic, then the in-depth interview is very useful (Boonyam, T., 2021). It helps to find the depth of knowledge about the topic and offers a more complete sight related to the topic. In the in-depth interview, the determination of the place of interview and the situation of the interview is important, because if the potential participants are not comfortable or included talking openly, then the interview has to distinguish the individual information. 

A face-to-face interview is a singular meeting or a visit between the interviewee and the questioner. Meetings can zero in on past or present occasions, as well as private troubles. Most subjective examinations start with open meetings to get a wide 'image' of what is happening. As you intend to gather the member's encounters, insights, thoughts, and sentiments, it shouldn't provide a lot of guidance, and try not to impact the reactions to match 'your' perspective. You ought to ask the members to unreservedly communicate their thoughts (Barrett-Rodger et al 2022). The resulting principal and subordinate inquiries get more thought as the meeting advances. An up close and personal or individual meeting could last 30 to an hour and a half. Most of the meetings are semi-organized (Blin, É. 2021). To fabricate a meeting manual for a guarantee that a bunch of subjects is covered by every member, a system for building a semi-organized interview guide might be utilized: (1) recognize the essentials for utilizing a semi structured interview and evaluate whether a semi structured interview is the proper information assortment technique; (2) recover and apply earlier information to acquire a thorough and sufficient comprehension of the peculiarity under study; and (3) form a primer meeting guide by operational zing earlier information. (4) Pilot-test the fundamental meeting manual to guarantee that the material is covered and significant and to show the requirement for question reformulation; (5) finishes the meeting manual to catch rich information with a reasonable and sensible aide.

In an interview, the first few minutes are very important and at the same time decisive because they give room to the participants to share their experiences. In the first few minutes, the participant can get the feeling of ease sharing their thoughts and feelings (Boden et al 2019). In the semi-structured interview, the interviewer started the interview with open questions that are related to the topic of the research and this helps the participants to share their feeling freely. The key aim of the questions is to encourage the participants to share their own experiences in this matter such as the payment issue in the music industry, including their emotions, and feelings and it is often focusing on particular events or specific experiences. As the interviewer wants to get as much information as detailed as possible, the interviewer can also ask follow-up questions and encourage to tell more details by utilizing prompts and probes or keeping silent for a short period (Jansson, A., 2021). The interviewer can ask the and why question first and then the how question. The interviewer required to be prepared to handle problems that he or she might be the encounter, like success gain, dealing with the various informal and formal gatekeepers, privacy to record data and negotiation for space, participants' reluctance to share their experiences, socially desirable answer, deciding the appropriate role such as emotional attachment and exiting from the fieldwork at the initial time.

The in-depth interview provides much more specific and detailed information about the topic than any other data collection method such as a survey or secondary data collection. It provides a more relaxed environment where the participants can open up about their feelings and can share their thought (Lumumba-Kasongo, E., 2019). The process of conducting the in-depth interview is not different from other research processes such as it also consists of the plan and instrument development, data collection, data analysis, and findings.

  • Plan - in this period the researcher was involved in the identification of participants of the interview mostly from the music industry, identification of the information that the researcher needed, listing of the participants for the interview, and ensuring the research would follow the national and international ethical standards of research (Kamara II, K., 2018).
  • Instrument development - This stage consists of developing the protocol of the interview, developing the guidelines for the interview, and listing all the questions that will be asked to the participants primarily, and if necessary the guide has to be translated into the local language.
  • Data collection - In this stage, the interviewer set up the interview and collects data that he or needs for his or her research process.
  • Data analysis - The collated data from the interview is reviewed and analyzed in this stage.
  • Findings - Writing a report about the findings of the interview and soliciting feedback from the interviewee.

4.7.2 Justification for using in-depth interviews in my research

It is basic to pick what to underline in each offered perspective. The focal point of perceptions is crucial since it can never see everything, and every situation must be noticed once. The accentuation of every perception “Who do you notice?” “What do you notice?” “Where does the perception occur?” “When does it occur?” “How can it work out?” and “For what reason does it occur as it works out?” Observations are not static; rather, they progress through three phases: expressive, focused, and chosen (Mühlbach, and Arora, 2020). Elucidating suggests noticing all that occurs in the circumstance in light of expansive requests. Centered perception is noticing explicit conditions for a while; for certain parts turn out to be more obvious.

Selective observation refers to observing only very particular concerns. For instance, on the off chance that the specialist wishes to notice the installment framework for low-paid craftsmen going from the music business to general craftsmen, the scientist might start with expansive perceptions to acquire a far-reaching comprehension of the system. This could involve concentrating on the performer in various situations (Webster, J., 2020). Assuming the analyst confirms that the commitment of makers warrants extraordinary thought, it might then focus on the jobs of individual makers and associations, as well as their interconnections. At long last, the researcher might decide to zero in exclusively on situations in which artists and industry experts share data. The researcher should accept notes on these perceptions and add their perspectives on the circumstances (Rantakallio, I.M., 2019). It shouldn't jot down words, full expressions, or areas of conditions, as well as reflections on paper or some other electronic medium (PATWICHAICHOAT, M.G., 2019). To contain broad subtleties, the field notes should be concocted and recorded instantly following the perceptions.

Interviews between both the respondent(s) and the interviewer are focused on inquiry questions. Individual meetings, at times known as up close and personal meetings, ought to be isolated from center gathering discussions. Inquiries questions focusing on the point under research are set out in a poll plan for interviews led or a scrutinizing pathway for center gathering conversations. The inquiries are posed with a specific request. The interview of individuals is not entirely set in stone by the respondents and how the meetings continue. During the meeting, the questioner will go volatile through the arrangement of inquiries as the point advances. It ought to be a discussion, not a back, and forth discussion (Barata, and Coelho, 2021). The request for a center gathering conversation is intended to encourage connection among the individuals, who should modify the succession in light of how their subject advances. Working utilizing a meeting guide or addressing course permits you to get data from all members on determined subjects. The questioners are in control as in the direct the meeting, while the members are accountable for their reactions.

Nonetheless, the person should be adequately liberal to see that specific applicable issues for members might have been ignored in your meeting guide or addressing course and should be incorporated (Mulde et al 2021). To build the meeting guide or addressing course further during the information gathering process and change it relying upon the investigation. The meeting guide and addressing course might include open and general inquiries, tests, and prompts, as well as subordinate or explicit inquiries, tests, and prompts. ”Might you at any point educate me really concerning this?” or “Then, at that point, what occurred?” are instances of test requests. Prompts are expressions or signs that encourage members to convey their accounts further. Eye-to-eye connection, inclining forward and open non-verbal communication is instances of animating prompts. The in-depth interview yields far more particular and extensive information on the issue than any other kind of data gathering, such as a survey or secondary data collecting. It creates a more comfortable environment in which people may express themselves and share their ideas. The method of conducting an in-depth interview is similar to other research procedures in that it includes the formulation of a strategy and instruments, data collecting, data analysis, and conclusions (Kim, H.J., 2020). It aids in determining the degree of knowledge about the issue and provides a more comprehensive view of the topic. The decision of the venue of the interview and the condition of the interview is vital in the in-depth interview, since if the possible participants are not comfortable or included talking openly, then the interview must separate the individual information.

4.7.3 Challenges in-depth interviews with Music Artists

In-depth interviews have different advances as stated above and along with these advantages, there are different challenges to face by the researcher during the in-depth interview. These are -

  • The sample size of the in-depth interview is very small, in this research it is about 10 to 15 participants (Mihalache, 2019). As the sample size is very small then the scientific process of the sample selection such as random sampling or other different processes is not maintained. Hence these create concerns about the generalizability or external validity of the research. 
  • Interview replies may be skewed because the researcher wants to "show" that a program works. Opinions from participants and programmed participants may potentially be prejudiced owing to their involvement in the program or a variety of other factors. To minimize biases, every attempt has to be taken to develop a data gathering endeavor, establish tools, and conduct an interview.
  • Because of the time needed to organize interviews, record them, and analyze the findings, interview questions may be a time-consuming evaluation task. Add time in the data gathering operation for translation and evaluation of this extensive data.
  •  To evoke the most exact and rich material from the questioner, an interviewee should assist them with feeling calm and look participated in what they need to say. They should likewise use fruitful meeting procedures, for example, limiting yes/no and provocative inquiries, utilizing appropriate non-verbal communication, and keeping their thoughts in charge.
  • While directing inside and out interviews, speculations concerning the outcomes are habitually difficult to make since few examples are utilized and arbitrary testing systems are not utilized (Kang, E.B., 2021). Top-to-bottom meetings, then again, give fundamental data for programs, particularly when joined with different methods of information gathering. It ought to be referenced that the standard rule for interview test size is that when similar stories, topics, concerns, and subjects rise out of the questionnaires, a satisfactory example size has been achieved.
  • Privacy is a different issue, in addition to a part of the mystery. Meets some of the time jumps into regions that were not expected toward the beginning. Moreover, there is a gamble of voyeurism and the propensity to focus on the most thrilling parts of an examination and to inspect hair-raising occasions (Sundler et al. 2019). There is a particular issue with ‘dyadic’ requests, for example, while using meetings to investigate hardships among guardians and those they care for, or while utilizing meetings to explore family cooperations. At the point when the questioner investigates into locales that somewhere around one respondent might want to leave well enough alone, protection is endangered. Secrecy is risked as the meetings reveal beforehand obscure data about the couple (Gervais, A., 2019). The most predominant danger found is in report composing and, specifically, the utilization of citations. People may not be distinguished to the more extensive public, yet they might be recognizable to different members of the examination.
  • Informed assent is researched. The worries about security and mystery are referred to as justification for their pertinence in interview research. While it is ideal for the member to know about the classification and protection rules before choosing to partake in the meeting, the security issue suggests that this isn’t guaranteed completely. Subsequently, a few interviewers advocate a cycle assent or consistent model, in which the specialist builds up understanding all through the review cycle. In a meeting, this needs judgment: “Is it OK if we discuss it somewhat more?” This assent worldview has been tended to in various circumstances and isn't without imperfections. For instance, there is a gamble that volunteers will be tempted into the examination because of fragmented data and afterward feel committed to proceed. In somewhere around one event, the assent cycle model is utilized (Morrell-Scott, 2018). A few investigations feature the troubles of getting educated consent when respondents have a place with a burdened populace.

Many meetings manage delicate subjects, which can make them genuinely charged (Lanzoni, L., 2020). They could imperil both interviewers and interviewees. Numerous scientists weigh potential harm versus potential helpful advantages that they have either noticed or completely analyzed. Other exploration, notwithstanding, cast uncertainty on this helpful benefit. Since dementia can influence a singular's capacity to simply decide, the capacity of people with dementia to offer informed agree is basic to their support in research. In any case, it is basic to recall that a dementia determination doesn't naturally suggest that somebody can't offer informed assent; rather, it is best practice to consider individuals with dementia skilled to give consent until in any case evaluated by an expert.

4.8 Conclusion

"Phenomenological research for the music streaming service: are artists getting paid what they deserve?" topic of the research where researchers observed participants and analyze personal experience of participants with proper data analysis method. The research is based on primary research, which consists mostly of in-depth interviews and a review of secondary research publications on this issue. To collect data for this study, the researcher conducts face-to-face interviews as well as a distinct online interview approach. Qualitative research is executed to get significant study outcomes in a range of scientific fields. Qualitative research, like positivist examination, is based on interpretative and constructivist perspectives, to understand a review subject rather than anticipating outcomes. Interpretivism seeks to safeguard knowledge through comprehending people's specific viewpoints and the meaning associated with those opinions. Furthermore, subjective research seeks to understand the members' internal viewpoints from real members. As a result, it is emic and idiographic. The review topics do not dictate the information assortment. Inductive information analysis is used to understand the meanings that people assign to their experiences.

Phenomenology is a methodology developed by Martin Heidegger to investigate real human experiences and how objects are seen and seem to awareness. There have been intense debates over the optimal methods for doing phenomenological research. Regardless, there are two essential types to consider: clear and hermeneutic. These adhere to Husserl's and Heidegger's broad philosophical approaches, respectively. The ideas from the hermeneutic or interpretative methodology, which is founded on the principles that diminution is impossible and hence eliminates suspending individual convictions for the comprehension of events, are a striking contrast to the prior.

A recruiting plan is a formal plan that describes the recruitment approach, scale, and strategy. A qualitative sample plan defines the number of inspections, interviews, focus group interviews or instances that must be performed to ensure that the findings give rich data. The participants of this research selected on the basis of theoretical background of phenomenological research interview. Qualitative techniques may rely on interviews with a small group of people who have certain features. These elements are decided by the researchers' pre-defined qualifying criteria, which may include traditional categories like gender, nationality, sexuality, or age, as well as more specific characteristics and experiences related to people’s professional or personal lives. There are various ways to reach out to these "publicly available" prospective participants but in this research only people from music industry has been selected because they can share their personal experience and this will help to get better outcomes of the research. The researcher uses his different social media platforms to invite participants for data collection. Another technique is to reach out to people in cafés, campuses, streets, and neighborhoods, as well as through chat rooms and websites. When people try to make sense of their experiences, constructivism believes the knowledge is manufactured. The subjective evaluation has focused on individuals' lived experiences and is essentially abstract and vulnerable to the preferences of both analysts and members. Primary data gathering methods include monitoring partners, conducting interviews, and focusing on a specific group conversation. The way of data collection through the member who is engaged in this method, as well as the group who is participating in that group discussion, and also the person who is obtaining their interview on these topics, is the observation of the member of the group. The in-depth interview yields far more particular and extensive information on the issue than any other kind of data gathering, such as a survey or secondary data collecting. It creates a more comfortable environment in which people may express themselves and share their ideas. In the research data has been collected through in-depth interview where researcher interviews\d participants face-to-face and online mode. As the sample size of the in-depth interview is small there is a chance of biasness in the results, to overcome this issue the researcher also conduct an online interview to reach greater number of participants.

References

Journals

Ahmed, S. and Asraf, R.M., 2018. The workshop as a qualitative research approach: lessons learnt from a “critical thinking through writing” workshop. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication2018, pp.1504-1510. 

Amin, M.E.K., Nørgaard, L.S., Cavaco, A.M., Witry, M.J., Hillman, L., Cernasev, A. and Desselle, S.P., 2020. Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy16(10), pp.1472-1482.

Archibald, M.M., Ambagtsheer, R.C., Casey, M.G. and Lawless, M., 2019. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International journal of qualitative methods18, p.1609406919874596.

Ashraf, I., Hur, S., Shafiq, M. and Park, Y., 2019. Catastrophic factors involved in road accidents: Underlying causes and descriptive analysis. PLoS one14(10), p.e0223473.

Atmowardoyo, H., 2018. Research methods in TEFL studies: Descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research9(1), pp.197-204.

Barrett, D. and Twycross, A., 2018. Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing21(3), pp.63-64.

Basias, N. and Pollalis, Y., 2018. Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research7, pp.91-105.

Bouncken, R.B., Qiu, Y., Sinkovics, N. and Kürsten, W., 2021. Qualitative research: extending the range with flexible pattern matching. Review of Managerial Science15(2), pp.251-273.

Cassol, H., Pétré, B., Degrange, S., Martial, C., Charland-Verville, V., Lallier, F., Bragard, I., Guillaume, M. and Laureys, S., 2018. Qualitative thematic analysis of the phenomenology of near-death experiences. PloS one13(2), p.e0193001.

Cerqueira, S., Arsenio, E. and Henriques, R., 2021. On how to incorporate public sources of situational context in descriptive and predictive models of traffic data. European Transport Research Review13(1), pp.1-22.

Churchill, S.D., 2018. Explorations in teaching the phenomenological method: Challenging psychology students to “grasp at meaning” in human science research. Qualitative Psychology5(2), p.207.

Errasti?Ibarrondo, B., Jordán, J.A., Díez?Del?Corral, M.P. and Arantzamendi, M., 2018. Conducting phenomenological research: Rationalizing the methods and rigour of the phenomenology of practice. Journal of advanced nursing74(7), pp.1723-1734.

Feyaerts, J., Henriksen, M.G., Vanheule, S., Myin-Germeys, I. and Sass, L.A., 2021. Delusions beyond beliefs: a critical overview of diagnostic, aetiological, and therapeutic schizophrenia research from a clinical-phenomenological perspective. The Lancet Psychiatry8(3), pp.237-249.

Franz, D., Marsh, H.E., Chen, J.I. and Teo, A.R., 2019. Using Facebook for qualitative research: a brief primer. Journal of medical Internet research21(8), p.e13544.

Frechette, J., Bitzas, V., Aubry, M., Kilpatrick, K. and Lavoie-Tremblay, M., 2020. Capturing lived experience: Methodological considerations for interpretive phenomenological inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods19, p.1609406920907254.

Gill, P. and Baillie, J., 2018. Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: an update for the digital age. British dental journal225(7), pp.668-672.

Hamilton, J.B., 2020. Rigor in qualitative methods: An evaluation of strategies among underrepresented rural communities. Qualitative Health Research30(2), pp.196-204.

Hutabarat, A. and Simanjuntak, D.C., 2019. A Phenomenological Study: Speaking Anxiety Overwhelms English Learners. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture4(1), pp.44-59.

Imanzadeh, A. and Hamrahzdeh, M., 2018. Identification of facilitators and deterrents of the quality of life in elderly women and men: a phenomenological research. Iranian Journal of Ageing12(4), pp.430-445.

Indriani, F. and Atiaturrahmaniah, A., 2019. Evaluation of the implementation of integrative thematic learning: A qualitative research approach phenomenology. JurnalPenelitiandanEvaluasiPendidikan23(2), pp.184-196.

Jackson, C., Vaughan, D.R. and Brown, L., 2018. Discovering lived experiences through descriptive phenomenology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management30(11), pp.3309-3325.

Jimenez, M.E., Hudson, S.V., Lima, D. and Crabtree, B.F., 2019. Engaging a community leader to enhance preparation for in-depth interviews with community members. Qualitative health research29(2), pp.270-278.

Johnson, J.L., Adkins, D. and Chauvin, S., 2020. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American journal of pharmaceutical education84(1).

Kaur, H. and Phutela, A., 2018, January. Commentary upon descriptive data analytics. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) (pp. 678-683). IEEE.

 Khadem, H., Shahidi, S., Zarani, F. and Panaghi, L., 2022. Mood changes in bipolar disorder: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of the space-time experience.

Liang, R., Dornan, T. and Nestel, D., 2019. Why do women leave surgical training? A qualitative and feminist study. The Lancet393(10171), pp.541-549.

Mabogo, M.G., 2019. A phenomenological study on experiences of people living with HIV and AIDS: towards the development of a user-led interview model in the Vhembe District, Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation).

Mabogo, M.G., 2019. A phenomenological study on experiences of people living with HIV and AIDS: towards the development of a user-led interview model in the Vhembe District, Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation).

McNarry, G., Allen-Collinson, J. and Evans, A.B., 2019. Reflexivity and bracketing in sociological phenomenological research: Researching the competitive swimming lifeworld. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(1), pp.138-151.

Meyer, K. and Willis, R., 2019. Looking back to move forward: The value of reflexive journaling for novice researchers. Journal of gerontological social work62(5), pp.578-585.

Mihalache, G., 2019. Heuristic inquiry: Differentiated from descriptive phenomenology and aligned with transpersonal research methods. The Humanistic Psychologist47(2), p.136.

Miller, R.M., Chan, C.D. and Farmer, L.B., 2018. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative approach. Counselor Education and Supervision57(4), pp.240-254.

Mirick, R.G. and Wladkowski, S.P., 2019. Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. The Qualitative Report24(12), pp.3061-3072.

Morrell-Scott, N.E., 2018. Using diaries to collect data in phenomenological research. Nurse researcher25(4), pp.26-29.

Morrell-Scott, N.E., 2018. Using diaries to collect data in phenomenological research. Nurse researcher25(4), pp.26-29.

Nicholls, C.D., 2019. Innovating the craft of phenomenological research methods through mindfulness. Methodological innovations12(2), p.2059799119840977.

Niyazi, K.A.Y.A., 2018. Main challenges in front of the teachers to teach geography more effectively: A phenomenological research. Review of International Geographical Education Online8(2), pp.371-393.

Niyazi, K.A.Y.A., 2018. Main challenges in front of the teachers to teach geography more effectively: A phenomenological research. Review of International Geographical Education Online8(2), pp.371-393.

Puddephatt, J.A., Keenan, G.S., Fielden, A., Reaves, D.L., Halford, J.C. and Hardman, C.A., 2020. ‘Eating to survive’: A qualitative analysis of factors influencing food choice and eating behaviour in a food-insecure population. Appetite147, p.104547.

Rutakumwa, R., Mugisha, J.O., Bernays, S., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Mbonye, M. and Seeley, J., 2020. Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis. Qualitative Research20(5), pp.565-581.

Schnittker, R., Marshall, S., Horberry, T. and Young, K.L., 2018. Human factors enablers and barriers for successful airway management–an in?depth interview study. Anaesthesia73(8), pp.980-989.

Suddick, K.M., Cross, V., Vuoskoski, P., Stew, G. and Galvin, K.T., 2021. Holding space and transitional space: stroke survivors’ lived experience of being on an acute stroke unit. A hermeneutic phenomenological study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences35(1), pp.104-114.

Sundler, A.J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C. and Palmér, L., 2019. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing open6(3), pp.733-739.

Sundler, A.J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C. and Palmér, L., 2019. Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing open6(3), pp.733-739.

Surmiak, A., 2018, September. Confidentiality in qualitative research involving vulnerable participants: Researchers’ perspectives. In Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 393-418). FreieUniversität Berlin.

Thompson, R., 2018. A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of Emotional and Cultural Intelligence of International Students in the United States of America. Journal of International Students8(2), pp.1220-1255.

Umanailo, M.C.B., 2019. Overview phenomenological research.

Umanailo, M.C.B., 2019. Overview phenomenological research.

YE??LYURT, M. and Mustafa, E.R.O.L., 2019. Student Opinions on Efficacy-Based Learning Approach in Science and Technology Teaching: A Phenomenological Study. Temel E?itim1(1),

Recently Download Samples by Customers
Our Exceptional Advantages
Complete your order here
54000+ Project Delivered
Get best price for your work

Ph.D. Writers For Best Assistance

Plagiarism Free

No AI Generated Content

offer valid for limited time only*