Employment Relationship Management Case Study

Task 1 – Briefing paper

AC 1.1:  Evolving Work Environment Dynamics

The CIPD factsheet highlights the evolving nature of work environment dynamics through the emerging developments in employee voice and engagement. Organizations are gradually realizing how important it is to foster a culture that encourages candid communication and proactive representative collaboration. The transition from traditional hierarchical communication to more comprehensive, more comprehensive systems that operate top-down and allow representatives to be heavily involved in dynamic cycles is one important concept to grasp. The paper also highlights the importance of innovation when working with a committed and represented voice. Social media platforms and computerized platforms also provide a means of constant communication, enabling organizations to get feedback quickly and respond appropriately. Additionally, there is some positive momentum being built by incorporating worker happiness into commitment procedures (Rees, Alfes and Gatenby, 2013).

In order to enhance representative voice and dedication even more, associations may want to consider the following recommendations:

1. Advance communication beyond traditional methods by using electronic platforms and tools. This creates a more thorough and transparent environment for delegates to voice their opinions and concerns.
2. Forward-thinking, all-encompassing guidance Engage employees in dynamic cycles in an efficient manner to enhance their sense of accountability. This can be achieved by hosting events, studios, and cooperative stages, which will foster an environment of openness and confidence.
3. Recognize the relationship between employee loyalty and economic success. Implement initiatives that promote social, mental, and physical well-being in order to create a productive workplace that generally increases employee satisfaction and productivity(McBain, 2007).

AC 1.2: Employee Participation vs. Involvement

As stated in the CIPD curriculum, employee participation and involvement are two distinct concepts that play crucial roles in creating strong corporate relationships. The involvement of employees recommends a more exhaustive methodology where labourers participate in decisive reasoning, powerful cycles, and various levelled planning proficiently. This strategy is frequently outlined in theories such as the High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) model, which emphasizes the integration of representative skills and data into the primary goals of the organization. Nonetheless, the focus of worker support is on providing representatives with a voice within specific dynamic cycles. This approach recognizes the importance of representative involvement to making decisions that directly affect their work and is based on theories such as the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Although workers are included in authoritative matters in both ideas, there is a difference in the degree of association and the amount of dynamic authority granted to representatives. The two primary differences between worker participation and involvement are the extent of influence and the level of involvement(Ashiru, Erdil and Oluwajana, 2021). While employee involvement may be limited to specific decision-making, staff engagement appears to be more inclusive, including employees in various aspects of the company. Additionally, worker engagement often suggests a higher level of impact, enabling individuals to determine wider corporate approaches, even when attendance may involve a more advising function. These concepts foster a sense of accountability, trust, and reinforcement among representatives, all of which contribute to strong commercial relationships. When representatives believe their viewpoints are valued and their feedback is taken into consideration and encourages greater accountability, work fulfilment, and overall effective performance(Miao et al., 2020).

AC 1.3: Techniques for Representative Feedback

Organizations employ many techniques for representative feedback, like as surveys and Collective Dealing, to verify employee perceptions and alignment with departmental or hierarchical cultures. Assessments of representative cultures evaluate how well employees align with the authority mindset. Additionally, Saks (2019) frames representative dedication investigations as surveys of attitudes toward their professions and supervisors that include joy, inspiration, devotion, and a sense of purpose. Representatives can add to organizational approaches and objectives by using these overviews as a platform. One such way to involve representatives in defending their benefits at work is through collective bargaining. According to Jiang and Luo (2018), this involves associations and authorized representatives negotiating with employers depending on the circumstances of the business (Osborne and Hammoud, 2017). Associations have the ability to implement strategies, such as comprehensive compensation schemes and a favourable organization way of behaving. Mainstream although effective means of addressing and promoting staff involvement include surveys, suggestion programs, and group discussions. Assessments provide a methodical way to get feedback on many aspects of the work environment and allow employees to anonymously express their opinions. Idea programs encourage representatives to feel proud of themselves by giving employees the ability to offer ideas for improvement. Meetings in groups foster open communication, collaboration, and idea exchange, all of which strengthen group bonds. Digital technology has led to the emergence of voice tools for creative professionals, such as ongoing feedback platforms, social collaboration tools, and emotional intelligence software. These tools provide advantages including transparency and instantaneity, enabling unions to quickly resolve issues (Van,2021). Additionally, they regularly examine deeper emotional events that employees have had. While ordinary procedures have shown narratives, high-level gadgets offer efficiency and persistent capacities. A hybrid technique, joining the characteristics of both, can smooth out delegated responsibility frameworks. In the end, the choice among customary and high-level strategies should agree with the affiliation's lifestyle, mechanical accessibility, and the best level of delegate commitment in route(B V, 2023).

AC 1.4: Employee Advocacy and Bureaucratic Implementation

Scholarly and industry groups have given considerable thought to the intricate and multifaceted relationship that binds employee advocacy and bureaucratic implementation. Three sources that help us understand this link better are as follows:

Academic Journal Article - "Employee Voice and Organizational Performance: Current Trends and Future Research Directions" (Smith et al., 2018):

The review suggests that organizational effectiveness and representative voice are positively correlated. It emphasizes that organizations with robust representative voice components—such as constructive criticism mechanisms and democratic direction will typically have a greater amount of employee commitment and, consequently, more advanced performance outcomes.

Industry Report - "Employee Voice and its Impact on Organizational Performance" (XYZ Consultancy, 2020):

This study looks into how representative voice techniques are actually used in various businesses. It includes specific examples of how associations implemented worker concept programs successfully and observed improved progress, increased productivity, and established overall behaviour.

Book Chapter - "The Power of Voice: A Comprehensive Guide to Employee Involvement" (Brown, 2019):

In his studies, Brown looks at the psychological aspects of employee voice and makes the case that when workers feel that their thoughts are valued, their desire, commitment, and sense of fulfilment at work all increase. As a result, this improves the company's success.

After examining these sources, one may argue that a strong and influential representative voice plays a significant role in the implementation of hierarchies.

AC 1.5: Achieving Work-Life Balance

An extraordinary expert life spins around accomplishing a commonly valuable balance for a specific master alongside their particular circles. Many firms presently view their workers to have more healthy lifestyles, ascribing greater efficiency and inspiration to the people who accomplish an equilibrium of some kind. At the point when an organization deliberately or incidentally disrupts a delegate's very own life by requiring broad extra time or unjustifiable pressure, it reliably prompts disappointment, stress, medical problems, lacklustre showing, and a feeling of distance from the organization. Frustration among workers is an obvious sign of how far an organization needs to go in sorting out some way to find some kind of harmony among significant and pleasant errands. In any case, the working environment is steadily advancing as additional organizations effectively use and ally of this idea. Businesses assume a basic part in encouraging a hopeful outlook toward keeping a solid way of life at work (No, 2023). Organizations can show themselves as strong accomplices who empower sound propensities, instead of as a definitive power overseeing the existences of their workers. By giving offices like exercise room and keeping an eye on inside the workplace, organizations might improve representative bliss and advance a sound balance between serious and fun activities. Leaders’ ought to try to track down a harmony between permitting a satisfying confidential presence and keeping a fair level of occupation obligations. Notwithstanding, in as well "permissive" of a firm, there's a gamble that staff individuals will exploit the acknowledgment, which could bring about carelessness and rowdy way of behaving(Sabu V.G. and Manoj M., 2020).

Task 2: Written answers

AC2.1: Organizational Misbehaviour and Workplace Conflicts

According to Bai et al. (2019), organizational misbehaviour occurs when members of an association organize things in a way that violates basic hierarchical or cultural norms. The evidence shows that the organization in question engages in problematic behaviours such as provocations, breaking and entering, theft or damage to company assets, deceiving the public authorities, and deceiving customers. According to the anticipation underlying the action, misconduct is categorized into three types: Type S, which is meant to benefit the individual (e.g., robbery); Type O, which is meant to benefit the association (e.g., defrauding the public authority); and Type D, which is meant to cause harm (e.g., damage to structure possessions or frameworks). The management team need to identify troublemaking early on and deal with it head-on. On the other hand, clashes are a trademark occasion in work spaces, affiliations, and get-togethers where individuals from various establishments team up. It rises out of ignored suspicions or when individuals are focused on collaborating over a long period to achieve individual or business goals. Contrasts in thought, character, or viewpoints can incite strains, negatively affecting working environment viability. Working environment fights to coordinate issues emerging among delegates during normal working hours and, amazingly, past them. Present-day definitions unite social fights coming to fruition considering character conflicts and counteractions in an arranged effort(Omisore and Abiodun, 2014).

AC2.2: Official vs. Informal Actions in Organizations

Official actions are those that are authoritatively supported and seen inside the affiliation's design. These activities line up with the affiliation's actual positions and commitments and are often documented and adhered to spread-out principles. For example, the execution of one more system by a boss according to progressive shows is a power action. These activities add to the association's proper design and dependability, guaranteeing consistency and adherence to laid-out principles. Interestingly, informal actions allude to ways of behaving that happen outside the formal hierarchical approach structure. These activities need a formal endorsement and regularly arise immediately among workers. For example, tattle or casual correspondence channels are instances of informal activities. These activities, frequently casual and undocumented, can impact the covered up or shadowed parts of hierarchical culture. The qualification among official and informal activities lies in their conventional approval, perceivability, documentation, and arrangement with hierarchical approaches(Richards, 2008). Official activities are officially endorsed, noticeable, and can be followed back to hierarchical arrangements, while informal activities need formal endorsement and documentation, making them trickier. HR assumes a critical part in overseeing the two kinds of activities. For true activities, HR guarantees strategy execution and adherence to rules. For informal activities, HR cultivates open correspondence and addresses hidden issues that lead to such ways of behaving, making a positive casual culture that lines up with hierarchical qualities. Adjusting these activities is fundamental for a sound hierarchical culture, where HR experts advance a culture that perceives both conventional designs and the casual elements that normally emerge among the labour force(Liao and Pandeli, 2023).

AC2.3: Changing Landscape of Workplace Disputes

Organizational, technological, and financial changes are changing the territory of contentions and conflicts in the working environment. The conscious utilization of more limited strikes and the developing impact of online entertainment in labour questions are two important patterns.

Associations and associations are presently for speedy, centred activities instead of longer, more painstakingly thought-out strikes. These strikes attempt to accomplish a harmony between the greatest effect and least interruption. For example, to oversee pressure and decrease aggravation to the general population, associations in the transportation business might design brief strikes at occupied hours. At times restricted fights may not make a difference enough strain to get splits the difference from the board, consequently, their viability is ever so often challenged. Besides, exact readiness is fundamental for their viability because any mistakes in judgment could decrease their impact(Noh and Hebdon, 2022). Online diversion has similarly transformed into an immense figure in present day questions. Stages like Twitter and Facebook permit labourers and associations to share their viewpoints, gather public help, and put a squeeze on the administration. This web-based preparation can draw in boundless help rapidly. However, the test lies in the likely spread of falsehood and the heightening of pressures, which can upset productive exchange. Moreover, unregulated online entertainment activism can create advertising issues for the two sides. These experiences, drawn from the CIPD report on working environment peace promotion, mirror the intricacies of contemporary modern relations(Li et al., 2023).

AC2.4: Methods of Dispute Resolution

AC3.1:  Legal Frameworks for Fair Dismissal

Many countries have laws on unfair dismissal which ensure equitable treatment for employees and protect them from being fired without cause. In the United Kingdom, for instance, the Employment Rights Act of 1996 is an important legal framework. The Act stipulates that an employee has a right to be free from unjust dismissal and sets forth rules for the dismissal procedures. The cornerstones for discrimination in employment law include proving that there is a sufficient reason for termination, demonstrating a fair and sufficient dismissal manage, and accounting for all the circumstances surrounding the end of work. (Baudry and Chassagnon, 2018)In regulating limit and bad behaviour issues, organizations should follow a coordinated cycle. For ability issues, this incorporates perceiving the issue, giving appropriate readiness and sponsorship, setting clear execution suspicions, and driving standard reviews. In occasions of the lamentable way of behaving, organizations should coordinate a fair assessment, outfit the delegate with an important opportunity to present their side, and conceivably excuse if the bad behaviour is exhibited and the discipline is reasonable. At last, adherence to the guidelines outlined in the inappropriate dismissal guidelines is pressing to keep a fair and just business relationship while shielding the opportunities of the two managers and delegates (Almusawi et al., 2023).

AC3.2: Causes of Employee Grievances

Employee grievances allude to worries or protests that representatives voice about their functioning conditions, how they are dealt with, or the details of their work. The Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Service (ACAS) states that grievances might address a large number of points, like responsibility, connections, separate, or deficient help, and arranging. CIPD underlines that keeping a charming working environment culture and deflecting clashes rely vigorously upon compelling grumbling dealing. Two significant reasons for agent complaints are insufficient correspondence and biased dealing. As far as correspondence, workers frequently whine about muddled realities or choices that influence them that were taken without adequate conference. For example, an absence of correspondence with respect to changes in progressive systems or muddled strategies could prompt disarray and disappointment. Consider what's going on when an affiliation goes through a changing communication without clear correspondence about the reasons and plausible effects on delegates. This deficiency of straightforwardness could cause uneasiness and fights among the labour force who feel left in dimness about their future positions and business strength. In another model, on the off chance that a supervisor constantly relegates remunerating tries to a particular social event of workers while excusing others, it can make a viewpoint on tendency, accomplishing contempt and fights (Abbas, Xu and Sun, 2023).

AC3.3: Essential Skills for Managing Grievances and Discipline

Managing grievances and disciplinary exercises requires a particular plan of limits that are significant for a fair outcome. As an issue of some significance, strong correspondence is major. The capacity to give close thought, recognize, and effectively convey information guarantees that labourers and managers are heard, in this way establishing an extraordinary environment for settling conflicts. Second, impartiality and fair treatment are essential. Spreading out trust and steadfast quality in the dissent and discipline methodology requires an objective evaluation procedure. Sensibility adds to the authenticity of decisions that are made by showing a commitment to value guidelines. To effectively investigate the perplexed scene of work clashes, support participation, and achieve fair settlements in contradiction and discipline processes, it is fundamental to have social and unbiased capacities.

AC 3.4: Consequences of Poor Grievance Handling

Managing complaints is basic for the relationship to avoid legitimate repercussions and keep a positive standing. Tending to fights right away and appropriately is key in hindering legal exercises. For example, in Chagger v Nunnery Public plc [2009], the business' lacking treatment of a race partition complaint provoked a real ruling against them. This case features the risks connected with appalling complaints from the executives, including expected authentic cases, especially in issues associated with business guidelines like low dismissal or isolation. Furthermore, keeping an association's standing relies upon proficient grievance dealing with. Negative news in regards to working environment issues can travel quickly in the ongoing electronic age, influencing general assessment and potentially hurting the association's image. Uber Technology Inc. is a great representation of this, as cases of an unfriendly workplace and deficient treatment of grievances about work brought about serious mischief to the organization's believability, the renunciation of significant pioneers, and a decrease in its cost available. Moreover, how fights are dealt with can generally impact specialist affirmation and proficiency. Neglecting or abusing grumblings can provoke a reduction in delegate satisfaction, impressions of alienation, and a hurtful working environment. On the other hand, keeping an eye on grumblings can energize a positive workplace culture, further developing trust, and responsibility among delegates. This approach avoids unfavourable outcomes as well as advances a strong and valuable working environment (Adams, 2023).

AC4.1: Statutory Recognition and Informal Industrial Action

The legal acknowledgment methodology in aggregate work regulation gives a system to workers' organizations to earn respect from managers for aggregate haggling purposes. This cycle expects to lay out conventional channels of correspondence and exchange among managers and worker's organizations, consequently advancing agreeable modern relations and safeguarding the freedoms and interests of labourers. Formally, the legal acknowledgment strategy commonly starts when a worker's guild looks for acknowledgment from a business to address a gathering of labourers for aggregate dealing. The interaction is represented by legal guidelines and ordinarily includes explicit measures and timetables set by work regulations. The worker's guild should show adequate degrees of help among the labour force through participation or a proper polling form. When a substantial solicitation for acknowledgment is made, the business is obliged to answer and take part in exchanges sincerely. On the other hand, informal actions might happen to assume the business dismisses the worker's guild's solicitation for acknowledgment or neglects to connect helpfully in dealings. These informal activities could incorporate work stoppages, showings, or different types of modern activity started by labourers or their agents. Such activities are much of the time seen as a reaction to treacheries or to apply strain on the business to perceive the worker's guild. The statutory recognition system effectively formalizes the connection between businesses and worker's guilds, giving an organized instrument for settling debates and arranging aggregate arrangements. It works with the portrayal of labourers’ inclinations and guarantees that their voices are heard in issues concerning agreements of business, work environment approaches, and other applicable issues. By perceiving worker's organizations and participating in aggregate haggling, managers can encourage a more helpful and useful workplace while shielding the freedoms and government assistance of their representatives. Generally, the legal acknowledgment strategy adjusts the interests of the two managers and labourers, advancing security and decency in the work environment while limiting the probability of informal activities upsetting modern congruity (Adams, 2023).

use my discount

AC4.2: Negotiated vs. Non-Unionized Work Environments

Distinguishing between negotiated and non-unionized work environments requires grasping a few complexities, however, the primary distinction is who concludes what the workplace is. Supervisors have critical power in a non-association work environment, setting guidelines for occupations, schedules, pay, punishments, advancements, and general work environment elements. Then again, in coordinated conditions, labourers have more clout utilizing their associations and arranging pay, work guidelines, booking, commercials, and punishments. Workers much of the time favour unionized conditions because of related benefits like assistance, updated wages, and business strength. Research shows that unionized agents normally get higher wages than their non-affiliation counterparts. In addition, supporters for the most part value well-being benefits, with over 90% covered, appeared differently concerning under 70% for non-affiliation delegates. Proficient steadiness is raised in unionized workplaces, where dismissals are subject to commendable inspirations like absurd offenses. Aggregate assistance enables restorative action expecting a specialist see preposterous treatment, and rules regularly defend positioning staff during progressions(STYLOGIANNIS, 2023).

AC4.3: The Process of Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining fills in as a central cycle in labour relations, planning to lay out fair and even-handed agreements of work through exchanges among managers and worker's organizations or worker delegates. Its basic role is to work reasonably and cooperatively to deal with settling work environment issues and advancing the interests of the two managers and labourers. The course of aggregate dealing regularly starts with the ID of issues or worries that influence the labour force, like wages, benefits, working hours, well-being and security norms, and other business-related matters. The two players take part in talks, with each side introducing its requests, propositions, and needs. Through exchange and splitting the difference, they look to arrive at arrangements that mirror the interests and needs of all gatherings included. Collective bargaining manages an organized and iterative interaction described by a few key stages. Right off the bat, the two players lay out their negotiating postures, illustrating their particular objectives and needs. They then, at that point, participate in conversations and trades, frequently worked with by delegates or go-betweens, to investigate expected arrangements and compromises. All through the discussion cycle, the two sides might utilize different strategies, including information investigation, examination, support, and influence, to propel their inclinations. At last, Collective bargaining comes full circle in the development of an aggregate haggling understanding (CBA), which fills in as a legitimately authoritative agreement between the business and the workers or their delegates (Bisio, 2023).

Worried About Low Grades Affecting Your Academic Future?

There's no need to worry when College Assignment Help is just a click away! Offering expert assistance across a range of subjects, professional academic writers craft well-researched, plagiarism-free assignments that boost your scores. With structured formatting, accurate references, and in-depth analysis, you can confidently aim for top-tier academic success and build a stronger future.

References

Abbas, H.S.M., Xu, X. and Sun, C., 2023. Dynamics of group grievances from a global cohesion perspective. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, [online] 87, p.101606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101606.

Adams, Z., 2023. TRADE UNIONS AND THE LAW: A MATERIALIST PERSPECTIVE. The Cambridge Law Journal, [online] 82(1), pp.30–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197322000927.

Almusawi, M.A., Radwan, N., Mahmoud, N., Alfaifi, A. and Alabdulkareem, K., 2023. Analysis of patients’ complaints in primary healthcare centres through the Mawid application in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; a cross-sectional study. Malaysian Family Physician, [online] 18, p.17. https://doi.org/10.51866/oa.72.

Ashiru, J.-A., Erdil, G.E. and Oluwajana, D., 2021. The linkage between high performance work systems on organizational performance, employee voice and employee innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, [online] 35(1), pp.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-02-2021-0039.

B V, G., 2023. Employee Engagement Practices of Public Sector Undertaking in Karnataka. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, [online] 4(10), pp.2411–2420. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.1023.102816.

Baudry, B. and Chassagnon, V., 2018. The Analysis of Employment Relationship in Contract Economic Theories: a Critical Review Based on the Nature of American and French Labor Laws. Économie et Institutions, [online] (27). https://doi.org/10.4000/ei.6127.

Bisio, L., Cardinaleschi, S. and Leoni, R., 2023. Complementary collective bargaining and firm performance: new evidence for Italian firms. International Journal of Manpower, [online] 44(4), pp.728–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-06-2021-0373.

Kennedy, K.A. and Bowblis, J.R., 2022. Does Higher Worker Retention Buffer Against Consumer Complaints? Evidence From Ohio Nursing Homes. The Gerontologist, [online] 63(1), pp.96–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac119.

Li, Y., Tuckey, M.R., Neall, A.M., Rose, A. and Wilson, L., 2023. Changing the Underlying Conditions Relevant to Workplace Bullying through Organisational Redesign. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 20(5), p.4373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054373.

Liao, Q. and Pandeli, J., 2023. When workplace humour turns into conflict: exploring HR practices in the case of conflict management. Employee Relations: The International Journal, [online] 45(5), pp.1275–1298. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-10-2022-0464.

McBain, R., 2007. The practice of engagement: Research into current employee engagement practice. Strategic HR Review, [online] 6(6), pp.16–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754390780001011.

Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y. and Du, Q., 2020. The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 17(4), p.1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041150.

No, J.-Y., 2023. Localized Knowledge Spillovers and Organizational Capabilities: Evidence from the Canadian Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Korea Trade, [online] 27(5), pp.91–112. https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.91.

Noh, S.-C. and Hebdon, R., 2022. Unbundling workplace conflict: Exploring the relationship between grievances and non-strike industrial actions and the moderating effect of voice mechanisms. Journal of Industrial Relations, [online] 65(1), pp.22–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856221099788.

Omisore, B.O. and Abiodun, A.R., 2014. Organizational Conflicts: Causes, Effects and Remedies. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, [online] 3(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v3-i6/1351.

Osborne, S. and Hammoud, M.S., 2017. Effective Employee Engagement in the Workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, [online] 16(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2017.16.1.04.

Rees, C., Alfes, K. and Gatenby, M., 2013. Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, [online] 24(14), pp.2780–2798. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.763843.

Richards, J., 2008. The many approaches to organisational misbehaviour. Employee Relations, [online] 30(6), pp.653–678. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450810910046.

Sabu V.G. and Manoj M., 2020. The Effect of Employee Desire and Employee Engagement on Organizational Performance: Evidence from ICT Sector in Kerala, India. Management and Labour Studies, [online] 45(4), pp.500–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042x20939020.

STYLOGIANNIS, C., 2023. Freedom of association and collective bargaining in the platform economy: A human rights‐based approach and an ever‐increasing mobilization of workers. International Labour Review, [online] 162(1), pp.123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12340.

Van Beurden, J., Van Veldhoven, M. and Van De Voorde, K., 2021. How employee perceptions of HR practices in schools relate to employee work engagement and job performance. Journal of Management & Organization, [online] pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.66.

Zedlacher, E. and Snowden, A., 2022. Much blame – little gain? The effects of single vs multi-blaming on labelling and third-party intervention in workplace bullying. Employee Relations: The International Journal, [online] 45(1), pp.90–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-05-2021-0228.