Understanding Academic Plagiarism's Impact on Workplace Professionalism Assignment Sample

Understanding Academic Plagiarism's Impact on Workplace Professionalism Assignment

Introduction: Understanding Academic Plagiarism's Impact on Workplace Professionalism

Native Assignment Help provides assignment help to assist students in the research, writing and proofreading process.

Academic plagiarism is the publication of original research final outcomes or new ideas and many more in look review journals. Academic plagiarism is copying from anyone’s writing and pretending the researcher shows that they wrote that if they change some of the words this is also known as plagiarism. This is incredibly cheating and anyone is appropriating anyone else’s work or job and creating the impression that it is their own and accepting praise for that. There are so many people who work hard to create a good reputation and trust and it can be severely destroyed by plagiarism. This has often led to a person losing their jobs also and there could be legal repercussions also if anyone decides to sue them and it can lead to financial penalties. Someone may lose their responsibilities and the government lost several ministers in this way. They have degrees to rescind if this is discovered after study and they suffer off their hard work and crack others also.

Discussion

Academic plagiarism has the prospective to disable professional future as impacted as this could be suffering an academic sole. This is such a major crime because this is hurting, unethical, and probably illegal also. This may lead to a few important outcomes that may be the main causes of lasting destruction to the plagiarist. This affects the researcher in the long run because they are dishonest, which makes it easier for them to be dishonest in the future. They may suffer apart educationally and most classes are a real study of the work they do, thus slowing down their personal and professional development. This affects the career of a researcher and they suffer from an opportunity cost and start their career much later than others of their age, and are therefore further behind in terms of advancement and salary increases (Awasthi, 2019). If plagiarism is discovered after the fact, one can be fired from a job later in their career, and the opportunities and prospects for future employment are reduced due to a tarnished reputation. Plagiarism is often caused by accidental copying and poor referencing but is probably not considered a valid reason. If the researcher needs more support for their academic writing and it has resulted in plagiarism, one option would be to admit it and ask to take extra lessons. This will prevent the same situation from happening again. 

Usually, it depends on the industry, the skill and reputation of the plagiarist, and the extent of the violation. A modest young researcher caught with any significant act of plagiarism will be fired and not re-hired. This person may have a path in industrial research or perhaps only in a teaching environment, a future in a research-oriented academic position seems unlikely. A principal researcher whose tenure is also suspended means that the reason was serious misconduct, such as dozens of plagiarism or plagiarism in proposals to major contributors. This may give many agencies pause before hiring, but some may still want talent. They can hire a person with several conditions to make sure it does not go worse again. Plagiarism is a serious research offense and getting fired for this is not just about getting caught, it is somehow significant and usually brings bad publicity to the plagiarist (Beske et al. 2019). The discharges show that the agency is not entirely neglecting oversight. Plagiarism and dismissal are black marks that will never go away, although with time, talent, and good behavior it is possible to restore someone’s reputation. It does not matter if someone volunteers the work knowing a researcher will claim it as their own, although there are some categorical exceptions to “honestly plagiarizing industries” like ghostwriting. They are plagiarizing whenever they claim to have done something they did not. It is basically dishonest to make people believe they created something they did not and accept payment for it. It also cheats them on the opportunity to get a fair evaluation and reward based on their own merits.        

Theory to business context 

A management theory helps the industry to communicate, engage and develop, and the theory is recognized in the business context, leadership, management, and industrial behavior but given two theories such as labor process theory and post-modernism analysis. Traditional business is very difficult with so many stakeholders and another involved management team, so much information, raw material, and cash, the business theory is the main science that is objected to the understanding systems, and that means the parts of the business system and the interconnection within the very individual parts (Cheers et al. 2021). The market business system allows individuals to exchange goods and services voluntarily, based on prices, without knowing each other. In market prices, for example, when buying a used car, people make decisions based on their cost-benefit calculations. When someone defines a business environment as their system, they can create various understandable parts and these are very essential and which play a good role. The business context is totally based on the insights parts and interactions and anyone can predict good behavior of the financial market and behave in a few parts of the business system.     

  

Figure 1: Theory to business context

The labour process theory

This theory is the purposeful activity objected to the production of using some values and the labor process loosely term of the work industry. The labor theory usually assumes, among other things, that value is fixed and can be objectively measured in relation to work. If that were true, all business would cease. If some items have known objective values, they would never be exchanged. In the first case, the owner of a more valuable object would not exchange it for a more valuable one. Otherwise, no owner would bother to do the deal because they would get nothing for their efforts. However, the slide rules are now “collectibles and have regained” their value and more (Tinanoff et al. 2019). During these changes, the work that was in the manufacture of the slider that was used in the business, which was now in some box, did not change, but its value and both in use and in exchange, even the use of slide rules have changed. If value were truly fixed, as labor theory requires, firms would have continued to produce them, wasting scarce resources that have alternative uses and causing pollution associated with the production process. The labor theory of value comes entirely from classical economics and was the standard theory until Karl exposed its radical implications, after which apologists for capitalism rushed to assemble all the theories to counter it. The important analysis of the labor process theory basically ignores the reality that there is also another way to develop some values besides combining labor with raw materials and value is generated through the put off of some consumption.  

Postmodernism analysis  

A post-modernism analysis has defined a set of styles or attitudes of evaluation that generate the analytical response to the improvement and identification of the logic of organizational relations that control social organization, while they exist in economics, literature, politics, and much more science. Postmodernism is a movement that demolishes all modern structures of thought and reason. It critically examines the relationship between language and reality. Postmodernism continues to dismantle all objective knowledge and asserts that there is no big picture or grand synthesis, only partial knowledge depending on context and perspective. Postmodernism offers new ways of understanding social reality, especially concerning the production of subjects, through power relations and the power-knowledge relation, which is summarized from the institutional means aimed at the production of subjects. The most prominent figures of post-modernism were Derrida and Foucault and they believed that the new age brought destruction like never before. Postmodernism was an attempt to achieve peace without using the tools that modernity has given to the researcher (Reinhardt et al. 2019). This theory is the only concern for the society that turned out to be and it also has alternative structures that can provide an agency through the present power and this is where the modern system has brought some destruction as not done before. Postmodernism is a movement that includes postmodernism. Just as postmodernism questions the structuralism assumption that structures are self-sustaining, postmodernism questions the modernist assumption that there is one way to do philosophy. This is done by specifically denying the existence of an objective world and that there are objective standards to be followed. 

Case Studies & Relevant Literature 

Plagiarism checkers are never told that they have no capability of doing that; they find the context that is the same as another and flag it for evaluation. The ethical practice requires publicly attributing the source of content to someone else, because original authors deserve credit for creating content and because learning builds on existing learning. Credit is an important part of the academic world, the researchers receive funding, positions, opportunities, and awards based on their academic work. Plagiarism takes much more than just words, especially plagiarism of ideas involves a breach of trust. It may be aware of ideas or content before publication, perhaps during the grant or manuscript peer review process, and when they use that content, this can be particularly damaging because it may implicate the actual author (Olivia-Dumitrina et al. 2019). These ideas are more difficult to detect and prove than the swiping of words or images, because the independence of ideas is common and plausible, and putting a stolen idea into their own words can wash it away. There are different levels of content plagiarism and the worst thing is to take an entire manuscript, grant proposal, or academic idea and put their name on it without a source; this is wholesale theft. A step-down, but still unacceptable, combines many disparate sources into a “patchwork”. Then they copy only parts, and finally, they use the content with a quote, but without a clear copied text. Some academics argue that the latter is a form of plagiarism, but in any case, it is not an acceptable way to write in the academic world.   

Link of Theory

The main web page created by the academics will allow users to post hyperlinks to copied information as well as the original context. In essence, the secondary issue with duplication is copyright, which affects texts and drawings but not ideas because only the presentation of ideas may be safeguarded by copyright, even though innovations based on ideas can be patentable. That indicates that work copyright protected has been used in excess of what is permitted under fair use laws and with the owner's consent (Meuschke et al. 2018). Plagiarism does not, however, always go hand in hand. Even publicly accessible content with copyright can be copied, but if someone copies a Shakespearean sonnet and signs their name, they are committing plagiarism. On the other hand, piracy violates copyright, but piracy does not carry the copyright and therefore is not plagiarism. This can be a problem because it can infringe copyright and lead to unnecessary publication, but it lacks the aspect that makes plagiarism so objectionable.

  

Figure 2: Link of theory

Conclusion

Academic plagiarism is not a legal issue nor an ethical issue but copyright, trademark, and patent laws are legal matters. If a researcher outlaws to do something, it is illegal to do it, if it is something they should not do, it is ethical if that is what the researcher has not done. Because plagiarism is essentially misrepresenting that, and often even involves receiving payment or credit or undeserved credit for work or ideas that were not theirs, it is considered wrong in most contexts, although it is not usually illegal. However, in many places, copyright law is civil, not criminal, so the victim must apply for it themselves. So it is illegal in the sense that they have broken the law, not necessarily that they will be arrested and jailed instead, the victim can sue the person in copyright court for damages. This can be harmful to the researcher’s reputation and the company's reputation that they have and if they get caught copying from anyone else’s job so the manager or boss may suspend their pay and the recent job is not only these things that could be threatened if they plagiarized their job.   

References

Journals

Awasthi, S., 2019. Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2).

Beske, F., Haustein, E. and Lorson, P.C., 2019. Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.

Cheers, H., Lin, Y. and Smith, S.P., 2021. Academic source code plagiarism detection by measuring program behavioral similarity. IEEE Access, 9, pp.50391-50412.

Gericke, N., Boeve?de Pauw, J., Berglund, T. and Olsson, D., 2019. The Sustainability Consciousness Questionnaire: The theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27(1), pp.35-49.

Meuschke, N., 2021. Analyzing non-textual content elements to detect academic plagiarism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05764.

Meuschke, N., Stange, V., Schubotz, M. and Gipp, B., 2018, June. HyPlag: a hybrid approach to academic plagiarism detection. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 1321-1324).

Olivia-Dumitrina, N., Casanovas, M. and Capdevila, Y., 2019. Academic writing and the internet: Cyber-plagiarism amongst university students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(2), pp.112-125.

Reinhardt, R., Christodoulou, I., Gassó-Domingo, S. and García, B.A., 2019. Towards sustainable business models for electric vehicle battery second use: A critical review. Journal of Environmental Management, 245, pp.432-446.

Tinanoff, N., Baez, R.J., Diaz Guillory, C., Donly, K.J., Feldens, C.A., McGrath, C., Phantumvanit, P., Pitts, N.B., Seow, W.K., Sharkov, N. and Songpaisan, Y., 2019. Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 29(3), pp.238-248.

Tseng, M.L., Ha, H.M., Lim, M.K., Wu, K.J. and Iranmanesh, M., 2022. Sustainable supply chain management in stakeholders: supporting from sustainable supply and process management in the healthcare industry in Vietnam. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(4-5), pp.364-383.

van der Jagt, A.P., Smith, M., Ambrose-Oji, B., Konijnendijk, C.C., Giannico, V., Haase, D., Lafortezza, R., Nastran, M., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š. and Cveji?, R., 2019. Co-creating urban green infrastructure connecting people and nature: A guiding framework and approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, pp.757-767.

Visser, S., Keesstra, S., Maas, G., De Cleen, M. and Molenaar, C., 2019. Soil as a basis to create enabling conditions for transitions towards sustainable land management as a key to achieve the SDGs by 2030. Sustainability, 11(23), p.6792.