Understanding Power, Oppression, and Anti-Discriminatory Practices Assignment Sample

Power Inequality and Discriminatory Practice

Introduction: Power Inequality and Discriminatory Practice

Native Assignment Help provides assignment help to assist students in research, writing and proofreading process.

1. Power and Oppression 

Power is basically considered as having persuasion, control or authority over individuals and resources. Therefore, power probably throughout is a kind of capacity to coerce or overlook others, manage resources, and implementing authorities. As a result, power particularly deals with the mastery of individuals to seek emotional and respective cooperation of objectives and to expand their abilities (Wyatt et al. 2022). Hence, power is a kind of capacity to rebel against unwanted commands and coercion as per the demands of society or community. Simultaneously, Oppression is a kind of mixture of institutional and prejudiced forces which makes a method that contrasts against some classes and advantages other classes of people. On the other hand, it acts as a cruel or unjust practice of management or dominion significantly due to the imposition of responsibilities like the situation of being considered down. It might be described as a task of pushing down which is fundamentally concerned with an intention of massiveness or obstacle inside the mind or body of a human being.

Power and Oppression impact on individuals

Power's impact on people demonstrates the transformation regarding the course of an individual`s conduct. Hence, those who contain this kind of characteristics in concern to power stand more reasonably to initiate a negotiation, connecting different individuals, and accepting endeavour when it is specifically undefined if such manners are authorised. However, power directs individuals to judge less restrained by “social conventions” and more possible to break social standards (Kenefick, 2021). Similarly, oppression drives deep misery, but stretching to arrange if single oppression exists is more sinful than a different problematic state. It decreases lived occasions and separates neighbourhoods that must be working concurrently. Many individuals encounter abuse established on social interchange ability. 

Power and Oppression impact on communities

It fundamentally appears when a separate social class is working without any kind of justification which concerns subordinated concerning communities (Liao and Carbonell, 2022). On the other hand, power and oppression pessimistically impact communities and it demonstrates the condition of subordination which discloses that it is not necessarily intentional but rather than outcome throughout a complicated “network of social restrictions”, going from institutions and laws to unspoken stereotypes and biases in perspective of communities. 

Power and Oppression impacts on society

Power and oppression also impact society negatively and it discloses that oppression and power are of particular concern to several aspects of society which are heterosexist, sexism, albinism, ageism, classism, and “anti-Semitism (Gandhi, 2022). Society's institutions”. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the government to emphasise culture and, education, all contributing to different part social elements which support reinforcing social elements like power and oppression in concern to marginalized social gatherings amid promoting dominant colonial groups in society. Therefore, society must secure itself from those kinds of social radical elements which are responsible for breaking human bonds with each other. Government must apply strict rules and regulations in concern to weaken the power and oppression influence, particularly from society. Hence, it will help to lead to creating a positive environment for living in an effective and innovative environment of society.

2. Anti-discriminatory & anti-oppressive practices 

Anti-discriminatory implies discrimination or disparity against an individual. Anti-discriminatory refers to practices and behaviour that prevents an individual or members of society from enjoying certain rights and facilities that others enjoy. On the other hand, anti-oppressive practices refer to acts and behaviour that prevent oppression against an individual in society (Low et al. 2022). These practices save individuals and members of society from oppressive behaviour that is physically and psychologically harmful. 

 Impact on anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive on individual

Discrimination has always been a social evil in every society, every continent, and every country. Even though we have been living in the 21st century and most of the people living on earth are well educated, discrimination remains. But there also has been an anti-discrimination feeling in the hearts of people which has impacted them to a great extent. Due to anti-discrimination an individual becomes a more confident person than he or she was before. He becomes able to achieve his place in society without facing any kind of hurdle which is not possible in normal circumstances (Westwood, 2022). Anti-oppressive practices have a positive impact on an individual as it prevents acts and incidences of oppressiveness against an individual. For example, anti-oppressive prevents harmful consequences against an individual such as physical harm and psychological injury. Oppressive behaviour against an individual could harm an individual; similarly, anti-oppressive exerts a positive effect on individuals. Therefore, it is argued that anti-oppressive have a positive impact and influence on the well-being of an individual. 

Impact on anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive community

Anti-discriminatory practices have a positive impact on the community as it assists to reduce incidences of disparity in the community. Anti-discriminatory positively affects the community by eradicating discrimination from the community and it also provides equal rights to individuals and members of society. Moreover, it is argued that the anti-discriminatory impact on the community is good as it minimises disparity in the community increasing equity. Therefore, anti-discriminatory have a positive effect on a community to live in society. In a community, people live together as a whole and they are related and connected in one way or another. Anti-oppressive movement gives a feeling of equality in individuals and helps in forming a community which does not discriminate between individuals as a result every individual in the community comes together to help each other. It is a of difficult situations without looking down upon them in treating them as equals (Williams, 2022). In this way, the community becomes a wholesome place where people can live peacefully and in harmony with everyone.

Impact on anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive society

Not only individual but anti-discriminatory also has a great impact on society when anti-discrimination comes the act since society is built by no one but an accumulation of individuals. With the help of anti-discriminatory impact, society starts to see everyone as equal without discriminating against them concerning gender, cast, nationality, or complexion. People in society start to act and think as one which leads to a better environment in every sphere of society (Tedam and Cane, 2022). Oppressive behaviour could harm society as it facilitates disparity, discrimination and hatred society. On the contrary, anti-oppressive behaviour has a positive impact on society as it promotes equity and respects society. Therefore, it is argued that anti-oppressive has a positive effect on society.

3. Thompson`s PCS model

Thompson’s PCS model is particular concern with discrimination and oppression for individual, communities and respectively for society. As a result, this model impressively works on major three factors which are the structural level, cultural level and psychological level. Therefore, it can say that psychological factors concern individual’s parameter while the cultural level deal with communities and the structural level collaborate with society. In addition, the main function of this model is to describe the connection among individuals, communities, and society to create an environment for living (Seviiri et al. 2022). Hence it shows if one of them will not work properly then it creates disable the execution of a healthy society. Besides that, the support of this model leads an environment to perform well in comparison to the form of societies. 

The main objective of this PCS model is to evaluate the importance of radical components in an atmosphere where an individual stay. Simultaneously, it helps to demonstrate the origination of power, oppression, and discrimination in every aspect of life. It shows that it does not concern whether it is staying in place or working environment those radical components have existed in every section of society (Brosbe et al. 2022). Therefore, it unveils that it also shed light on communities and their individual also affected society. However, society needs to tackle this kind of issue which is given below.

Impact of Thompson`s PCS model for individuals

Thompson's PCS Model remembers the importance of distinction and variety whilst proceeding outside a person's attitude. Therefore, living vigour from a "masculine perspective" and neglecting to comprehend another may conduct to a opinionated perspective and understanding of "internalised gender oppression”. Therefore, it is very important for individuals to work on the radical things to mitigate these challenges in the business (Karunamuni et al. 2022). It can say that there exist different forms for the objectives of announcing "anti-discriminatory practice" which is particularly engaged with varieties of purposes such as involving weights of maintenance, executing codes and policies of technique in the business. 

Hence, it can say that staff appointment and canvassing processes concede with the impact of the "Equality Act" so that every deservedly staff get as per its talented job role (Barnes et al. 2022). In addition, it also creates staff growth and apprenticeship intending to mentor several perspectives. Like staff meetings is fundamentally challenging or it can say discrimination for business. Hence, this kind of approach lowers the quality of assurance while engaging in business.

Impact of Thompson`s PCS model for communities 

The execution of the given PCS models specifically high the impact of this model in concern to cultural surroundings will support in comprehending perspectives personal opinions, cultural models, and structural organisations can conduct to the purpose of oppression while people live in the same society. Similarly, oppression drives deep misery, but stretching to arrange if single oppression exists is more sinful than a different problematic state. It decreases lived occasions and separates neighbourhoods that must be working concurrently. Therefore, responsible organisations come ahead to mitigate these challenges by execution of proper education for everyone. 

As a result, culture will form optimistic material every one concerns each other. It is only possible due to the implementation of the PCS model to mitigate community radicals. Therefore, PCS model have a positive effect on a community to live in society. In a community, people live together as a whole and they are related and connected in one way or another (Jensen et al. 2022). PCS model knows that the execution movement gives a feeling of equality in individuals and helps in forming a community which does not discriminate between individuals as a result every individual in the community comes together to help each other. 

Impact of Thompson`s PCS model for society 

The utilisation of this model help society to work at the artistic level, which is a particular concern to social criteria of someone are made via unanimity and agreement along with the opinions and sentiments of others to be the positive part of the society. Hence, this model specifically References shared beliefs concerning what is imagined by many in a society is not acceptable and the same parameter becomes the custom of society whether it is bad or good it does not matter. Therefore, it respectively creates a kind of consensus factor with different components of society. As a result, it is observed that the "cultural level" clarifies why stereotype types of people exist (Yusuf et al. 20220. Hence, it demonstrates if this kind of person does not exist in society, then society will not encourage them due to the influence of etiquette norms. 

On the other hand, it highlights fundamentally and indicated the objective of relying on "social expectations", and unique opinions which are reinforced by society. PCS model know positive human behaviour could harm society as it facilitates disparity, discrimination, and hatred society. On the contrary, negative human behaviour has a severe impact on society as it promotes inequity and disrespects among each in the society (Bataillon et al 2022). However, this kind of activity must be stopped and show the value of "cultural level" recognition in the society. Therefore, society must focus on personal sentiments and significance which helps to create a phenomenal kind of social conventions that are disseminated and strengthened by influence groups which are future leaders.

4. Political ideologies 

It discloses that a person must go through this kind of subject which helps individuals, communities and society to work corporately to make this world pleasant. It comes to the social analysis of, "a political ideology" it helps to create a trustworthy framework to see the individual aspect. community aspect and social perspective to mitigate the influence of ethical ideals (Finlayson et al. 2022). So origination of new society will happen which relies on doctrines, principles, tales or marks of a "social movement", organisation, course or enormous cluster that exemplifies how civilisation. As a result, it particularly works for the betterment of society which contains communises and, in that community, individual stay with this kind of social imprecise which must work and suggests some cultural and political blueprint for specifically social order in an environment.

Political ideologies on individuals

Personal principles are a kind of individual's perspective regarding life which must be ongoing. An individual forces himself on the objective of influencing human habitation (Swenson and Berquist, 2022). This study demonstrates that an individual has the responsibility to examine manifestation regarding personal ideology but not to force their perspective on other. There an individual not to do deep misery, but stretching to arrange if single oppression exists is more sinful than a different problematic state. It decreases lived occasions and separates neighbourhoods that must be working concurrently. Many individuals encounter abuse established on social interchange ability by political ideologies on individuals

Political ideologies on communities 

Fundamentally communities rely on several kind of political ideology for instance Anarchism, Communism, Conservatism, Environmentalism, Fascism, Feminism, and essence politics. As a result, it is argued that the discriminatory impact on the community is good as it minimises disparity in the community increasing equity. Therefore, creation of discriminatory have taken place which is not good effect on a community to live in society. In a community, people live together as a whole and they are related and connected in one way or another. movement gives a feeling of equality in individuals and helps in forming a community which does not discriminate between individuals as a result every individual in the community due to the involvement of political ideologies on communities 

Political ideologies on society 

Ideology is particularly a group of assembling which is related to the ideas in concern to society, usually facilitated to explain a specific style of a political movement. Principles enclose an illustrative procedure by which society provides grounds for the validities and issues of "the social life" (Abrassart and Wolter, 2022). As a result, they get assurance for enabling people and companies to concern themselves in the elevation of society. Simultaneously, ideology is a kind of mixture of institutional and prejudiced forces which makes a method that contrasts against some classes and advantages other classes of people. On the other hand, it acts as a cruel or unjust practice of management or dominion significantly due to the imposition of responsibilities like the situation of being considered down. It might be described as a task of pushing down which is fundamentally concerned with an intention of massiveness or obstacle inside the mind or body of a human being.

5. Ledwith`s Radical Agenda

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda is kind of community action established on codes of "social justice" and "environmental sustainability". Its operation, although constantly a sensible reaction to near points, concerns famous schooling, knowing to ask the "everyday taken-for-granted" rejections that are threaded via everyday energies. On the other hand, altered outlooks on life appear to be a better critical cognition, and this provides elevation to the belief, independence, and discernment to operate collectively jointly to enhance the grade of vitality for everyone. As a result, practitioners, this screams for an examination of energy, the epoch of thesis in motion, and "the organisation" of collaborative measures from residents to international classes to construct inclusive neighbourhoods in a better inclusive globe. Social brigades are more prominent than ever, "both within and between" homelands, as "neoliberal globalisation" grows its sweep, glaring a complimentary market focus established on a payoff imperative "across the world" (Bazhanov, 2022). At the identical time, society's consequence’s obligation to sociable transition is existing delighted underneath a "smokescreen" of managerialism, for transformative visions evolved and exercise evolves entrenched in the guideline as enhanced usefulness delivery. 

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda onindividuals

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda that a particular concern to social criteria of someone are made via unanimity and agreement along with the opinions and sentiments of others to be the positive part of the society. Hence, this model specifically references shared beliefs concerning what is imagined by many in a society is not acceptable and the same parameter becomes the custom of society whether it is bad or good it does not matter. Hence, this model specifically references shared beliefs positively in the society to get good result in the working places,

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda on Communities 

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda simultaneously carry a positive impact on the community as it assists to reduce incidences of disparity in the community (Nasution, 2022). Works on Anti-discriminatory positively affects the community by eradicating discrimination from the community and it also provides equal rights to individuals and members of society. Moreover, it is argued that the anti-discriminatory impact on the community is good as it minimises disparity in the community increasing equity. Therefore, discriminatory not have a positive effect on a community to live in society. 

Ledwith`s Radical Agenda on society 

It is observed that Ledwith`s Radical Agenda on society also has a great impact on an environment when anti-discrimination comes the act since society is built by only an accumulation of individuals. With the help of impact, society starts to see everyone as equal without discriminating against them concerning gender, cast, nationality, or complexion (Poirier et al. 2022). People in society start to act and think as one which leads to a better environment in every sphere of society. Hence, power is a kind of capacity to rebel against unwanted commands and coercion as per the demands of society or community. Simultaneously, Oppression is a kind of mixture of institutional and prejudiced forces which makes a method that contrasts against some classes and advantages other classes of people.

Reference list

Abrassart, A. and Wolter, S.C., 2022. Rejecting education as the basis of the social prestige of occupations: the role of polarized political ideologies and parties in Switzerland. Acta Politica, pp.1-35.

Barnes, A.C., Rodríguez-Zapata, F., Juárez-Núñez, K.A., Gates, D.J., Janzen, G.M., Kur, A., Wang, L., Jensen, S.E., Estévez-Palmas, J.M., Crow, T.M. and Kavi, H.S., 2022. An adaptive teosinte mexicana introgression modulates phosphatidylcholine levels and is associated with maize flowering time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(27), p.e2100036119.

Bataillon, T., Gauthier, P., Villesen, P., Santoni, S., Thompson, J.D. and Ehlers, B.K., 2022. From genotype to phenotype: Genetic redundancy and the maintenance of an adaptive polymorphism in the context of high gene flow. Evolution letters, 6(2), pp.189-202.

Bazhanov, V.A., 2022. Political Ideologies through the Lens of Modern Neuroscience. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 59(1), pp.117-135.

Brosbe, M.S., Thompson, C.C., Flanders, X.C., Day, A., Ward, C. and Slifer, K.J., 2022. Pain Catastrophizing and Functional Disability in Youth with Chronic Pain: An Examination of Indirect Effects. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, pp.1-11.

Finlayson, A., 2022. YouTube and political ideologies: Technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies, 70(1), pp.62-80.

Gandhi, M., 2022. Power from Oppression. Imperfect Heroes: Teaching in Challenging Times to Motivate Student Achievement, p.103.

Karunamuni, R.A., Huynh-Le, M.P., Fan, C.C., Thompson, W., Lui, A., Martinez, M.E., Rose, B.S., Mahal, B., Eeles, R.A., Kote-Jarai, Z. and Muir, K., 2022. Performance of African-ancestry-specific polygenic hazard score varies according to local ancestry in 8q24. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 25(2), pp.229-237.

Kenefick, A.,2021. Toward Making Meat Matter: Entanglements of industrial animal-agriculture, modern design, power, and oppression. Spiritual Sustainability: Pagan Sounds and the Impacts of Devotion on Sustainabl e Practices by Isaiah Green 86 Wet Ontologies by Dr. Laura Denning & Dr. Deepta Sateesh 96, p.118.

Liao, S.Y. and Carbonell, V., 2022. Materialized oppression in medical tools and technologies. The American Journal of Bioethics, pp.1-15.

Low, J., Wyke, B. and Barley-McMullen, S., 2022. 4 Anti-oppressive practice. A Student's Guide to Placements in Health and Social Care Settings: From Theory to Practice, p.16.

Nasution, N., 2022. Proposing Indonesia History Teaching that Transcends Political Ideologies. Indonesian Historical Studies, 6(1), pp.34-44.

Poirier, B.F., Hedges, J., Soares, G. and Jamieson, L.M., 2022. Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: An Act of Resistance against Australia’s Neoliberal Ideologies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), p.10058.

Seviiri, M., Scolyer, R.A., Bishop, D.T., Newton-Bishop, J.A., Iles, M.M., Lo, S.N., Stretch, J.R., Saw, R.P., Nieweg, O.E., Shannon, K.F. and Spillane, A.J., 2022. Higher polygenic risk for melanoma is associated with improved survival in a high ultraviolet radiation setting. Journal of translational medicine, 20(1), pp.1-13.

Swenson, E. and Berquist, S., 2022. Highland-Coastal Relations and Transformations in Dualistic Political Ideologies in Middle Horizon Jequetepeque. Nawpa Pacha, 42(1), pp.97-134.

Tedam, P. and Cane, T., 2022. “We started talking about race and racism after George Floyd”: insights from research into practitioner preparedness for anti-racist social work practice in England. Critical and Radical Social Work, 10(2), pp.260-279.

Westwood, S., 2022. Can religious social workers practice affirmatively with LGBTQ service recipients? An exploration within the regulatory context. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, pp.1-21.

Williams, K., 2022. Outlanders: Hidden Narratives from Social Workers of Colour (from Black and Other Global Majority Communities)(Compiled and edited by) Wayne Reid and Siobhan Maclean (eds.), Staffordshire, UK: Kirwin Maclean Associates. 352 pp., Price: 11.00 (GBP). ISBN: 9781912130566.

Wyatt, T.R., Johnson, M. and Zaidi, Z., 2022. Intersectionality: a means for centering power and oppression in research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, pp.1-13.

Yusuf, I.O., Qiao, T., Parsi, S., Tilvawala, R., Thompson, P.R. and Xu, Z., 2022. Protein citrullination marks myelin protein aggregation and disease progression in mouse ALS models. Acta neuropathologica communications, 10(1), pp.1-22.