Introduction - Exploring Scientific Methods and Ethical Issues in Psychology
The description of the psychology of the human mind helps to explore various topics engaging by this study followed based on the actions of the research. The study of the human mind and actions has taken a fascinating turn since psychology was first introduced. Dragging in the mission for understanding, this field is subject to a dynamic logical system to unravel the intricacies of comprehension and feeling. Clinicians utilize a different collection of techniques, going from experimental investigations and indications to observational examinations, each custom-made to disclose one-of-a-kind features of human brain research.
Discussion
The discussion of the study allows to discover the process of methods applied in psychology and its importance on humans. The methods which are suggested by the experts are also described in this with the proper suggestion to how to be used to with this for this reason. The evaluation of the applications of the two approaches in the study of psychology will also be presented in this portion. The elaboration of the ethical implementation of the research based on psychology will also be portrayed in this study to make an understanding of it.
AC 11.1 Section One: Importance of Scientific Methodology in Psychology
The consistent strategy is an efficient and observational methodology used to examine individualities, figure out and test assumptions, and reach interpretations because of goal proof. Concerning human brain exploration, strategy is the foundation that fluctuates the discipline into a thorough and valid science (Hayes, 2023). The methodology of this exploration of the study consists of observation, formation of the hypothesis, trailing or the investigation, collection of data, analysis, and the concluding part of the investigation. The principle is based on the objective and the organized inspection of the observable incidents which point to the efficient results that can add to the enhancing knowledge of this area. The employment of the logical strategy in brain science is crucial for laying out the sincerity of examination discoveries. Acceptability suggests the exactness and honesty of the outcomes attained, guaranteeing that they reflect what they imply to estimate. Based on the design of the research the scientific method permits to implement the precise experiments with continual measurement which helps to measure the design of the experiment independently. The designs of the research allow the experts to operate and measure the variables that can be made possibly by applying this design of the method. The scientific methodology highlights the significance of the meticulous research, consisting of the strategies to collect the sample, and the recognition of the variables.
Figure 1: The relationship between the dependent and independent variables
In the research of psychology, the variables can be classified into various variables d the dependent variable (DV), independent variables, and unimportant or extraneous variables (Kenjabayevna, 2020). The monitoring of the extraneous variables is crucial to differentiate the impact of the IV or the independent variables based on the dependent variables more precisely. The mechanism can ensure the effects that are observed can be recognized by the operated variable, which increases the rationality of the research. The strategy of collecting sampling the crucial component that comprises the group of representatives from the bigger population for simplifying the outcomes of the research. The scientific technique guides analysts in taking on irregular investigative or other precise strategies to limit the tendency and augmentation of the outside acceptability of their examinations.
AC 11.2 Section Two: Discussion of the Methods Used by Psychologists
The discussion of experimental and non-experimental methods of psychology have been discussed in this section to understand briefly to gain more knowledge about their importance. The experimental method is based on the experiments that are laboratory-based. The key points of this experiment are elaborated to understand its efficacy.
Laboratory-based experimental method
Key points of the experimental method
This type of experiment can be controlled environmentally by conducting a study where the experts of psychology can handle the independent variables of the methodology and also control the less important or extraneous variables (Borsboom et al. 2021). The participants are casually allotted for the experiments and for the controlling groups which can enhance the internal strength of the study. The accuracy of the method can allow the measure of the variables of the study more precisely and assist the formation of the reason and the consequences of the relationship between the variables.
Strength of the method
The laboratory-based experiments allow the psychologist to create a fundamental relationship between the variables because of the control and the elevated level of the variables. The replicability is another strength point of the experimental methods. The setting of the control can facilitate the duplication of the experiments which can cause to reliability of the outcomes.
The weaknesses of the laboratory-based experiments consist of the artificiality and the characteristics of the requirements. Artificiality is the concept where the opponents can argue with the setting of the laboratory which is not based on the real-world examinations that result in the limiting the findings based on the criteria of generalizability. The characteristics of the requirements of the participants may vary which can impact the response to the expectations.
Non-experimental study based on the case study
The non-experimental study also serves the chief or the key points, the strengths and the weaknesses of the study which are based on the relevant case studies.
Key points of the non-experimental method
The case studies include the comprehensive investigation of every participant, based on the incidents and the group. This can collect the details of the study more informatively. The experts can collect qualitative data based on a thorough understanding of the topic.
Strengths of this method
The relevant case studies help to focus on the phenomenon, particularly for the condition where the operation of the experimental study can be unethical (Bahodirovich, & Romilovich, 2021). The complete perspective of the method permits the inspection of the multiple variables.
Weaknesses of the method
The results from the case studies cannot be easily available to the wide population because of the inimitable nature of the cases of every participant. The explanation of the data for the case studies can be descriptive as it depends on the perspective of the psychologists and their judgments.
AC 21.1 Section Three: Evaluation of the application of two approaches in psychology
The aggressive behavior observed in the case of Luke’s behavior can be illuminated via the biological approach including various factors like the structure of the human brain, genetics, and the inequalities in the neurotransmitter (Poucher et al. 2020). The inequalities of the neurotransmitters consisting of dopamine and serotonin which are responsible for the violent nature and mood of human beings. The abnormalities of the brain specifically in the region of emotional monitoring and impulse regulation are the contributing factors to this.
Biological approach
The strength of this biological approach
The foundations of biological behavior emphasize the role of pharmacology, neuroscience, and genetics. Genetic studies have shown that genetic differences influence an individual's tendency toward aggression. Neuroscience has discovered abnormal brain structures and the inequalities of the neurotransmitters which is associated with aggression. Pharmacological research demonstrates that drugs that affect neurotransmitters can control aggressive actions (Harari et al. 2020). This experimental evidence is dependable on the biological field and provides a powerful basis for accepting the complex interplay between the factors of the biological approach and aggressive behavior.
Figure 2: The biological approach
Weaknesses of the biological approach
The reductionism of the biological approach can simplify the complex performance by controlling it to inherit neurochemical factors alone, perhaps contradicting the complexity of human behavior. Furthermore, a focus on biology may obscure the important encouragement of experiences and relative contexts on behavior, leading to incomplete knowledge that does not offer the context in which actions are detected in all results.
Behavioral approach
The aggressive nature of Luke can be recognized by the behavioral approach from the perspective of the behavioral nature. This can be developed through the opinion, strengthening, and imitation of the nature of human beings. The theory of social learning for behavior recommends that every personality can acquire their understanding by observing others and exhibiting their behaviors (Steiger et al. 2021). The strengths and weaknesses of this approach are also described to enhance the knowledge of the reactions in Luke.
The strength of the behavioral approach
The focus of behaviorism is based on visible behaviors which can make the study easier to measure the changes in the personalities. The interventions of a behavioral nature, including the alteration of the behavior may be functional for addressing and changing of the particular behaviors.
Weaknesses of the behavioral approach
This approach has limited importance in cognition which helps to disregard the processes of cognitive development and the mental condition which can also be influenced by the behavior (Brittain et al. 2020). Human behavior can be stressed by external factors that can help to avoid the processes of the cognitive development of the individual.
A great arrangement of Luke's ethics will come from a collaborative approach that takes into account behavioral physics and psychological processes. This may observe the relationship between environmental and genetic traits, the role of cognitive processes in the decision-making process, and the behavioral effects of social learning.
AC 31.1 Section Four: Discussion of the ethical implications of research
The result of the Pygmalion effect study concentrated by Rosenthal and Jacobson brings important moral thoughts up in the mental examination, especially in the domain of assumptions and the expected effect on human issues (Morris et al. 2020). This investigation, while giving important knowledge, helps to feature moral uncertainties that resound with more extensive conversations on the responsible direction of examination.
Informed agreement
One moral concern is connected with informed approval while the educators were not educated about the real essence of the investigation. They were given deceiving data about specific replacements’ scholarly potential. While this fraudulence was critical to the exploratory plan, it conveyed issues about the right of members to be completely educated about the review's motivation. Informed assent is an essential moral standard in research, stressing members, all in all, accurate to be aware and realize the idea of the review and any potential dangers disguised.
Dishonesty and the damage
The concentration of the additionally elaborates on a component of complication, as educators were given deceptive data about specific understudies' scholarly potential. Dishonesty can be morally sensible assuming it is considered important for the review's goals and on the off chance that means are taken to limit hurt.
Application of the other research
Concerning the research in the field of psychology the experiments of Milgram have also come to this subject of importance (Kaposi, 2022). The Study of Stanley Milgram based on obedience can include the themes by administrating it. This can be done by what the experts believe to be the progressively severe shock of the electrical connection. The person was an actor by profession, and the harm to psychological health can be observed by these examples of the generated conversions regarding the ethical treatment for the individual personalities.
Conclusion
The study has covered the methodology attained to experiment in the field of psychology. The consequence of an efficient and exact methodology in intelligence science couldn't possibly be more important, as it assures the validity of discoveries as well as advances the progression of information in this unique discipline. This study has successfully met the all requirements it has to be accomplished through the discussion of various approaches.
Confused about complex assignment guidelines?
Turn to expert Assignment Help that simplifies the most challenging instructions. From understanding the topic to submitting a well-researched final draft, qualified writers work closely with you to create content that meets your professor’s expectations. Stay confident in your submissions and get the clarity you need to succeed.
References
Journals
Bahodirovich, O. J., & Romilovich, B. R. (2021). Project for training professional skills for future teachers of technological education. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 139-150. [Retrieved from: http://mentaljournal-jspu.uz/index.php/mesmj/article/download/88/86][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756-766. [Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691620969647][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Brittain, S., Ibbett, H., de Lange, E., Dorward, L., Hoyte, S., Marino, A., ... & Lewis, J. (2020). Ethical considerations when conservation research involves people. Conservation Biology, 34(4), 925-933. [Retrieved from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3a925f04-1c41-447d-a194-e2995dbc9812/download_file?file_format=&safe_file=Ethical%2Bconsiderations%2Bwhen%2Bconservation%2Bresearch%2Binvolves%2Bpeople.pdf&type_of_work=Journal+article][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Harari, M. B., Parola, H. R., Hartwell, C. J., & Riegelman, A. (2020). Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103377. [Retrieved from: https://osf.io/ap8wm/download][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Hayes, G. (2023). Introduction to psychology [Retrieved from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1192&context=qb_oers][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Kaposi, D. (2022). The second wave of critical engagement with Stanley Milgram's ‘obedience to authority’experiments: What did we learn?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(6), e12667. [Retrieved from: https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/spc3.12667][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Kenjabayevna, D. G. (2020). DESCRIPTION OF SOCIAL ATTITUDES IN THE NOVEL “SHIRLEY” BY CHARLOTTE BRONTE. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 48-55. [Retrieved from: https://mentaljournal-jspu.uz/index.php/mesmj/article/download/8/7][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Morris, E. R., Lindley, L., & Galupo, M. P. (2020). “Better issues to focus on”: Transgender Microaggressions as Ethical Violations in Therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(6), 883-915. [Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ezra-Morris/publication/324654247_Better_issues_to_focus_on_Transgender_Microaggressions_as_Ethical_Violations_in_Therapy/links/5ee27a0da6fdcc73be731d5c/Better-issues-to-focus-on-Transgender-Microaggressions-as-Ethical-Violations-in-Therapy.pdf][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Poucher, Z. A., Tamminen, K. A., Caron, J. G., & Sweet, S. N. (2020). Thinking through and designing qualitative research studies: A focused mapping review of 30 years of qualitative research in sport psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 163-186. [Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1750984X.2019.1656276][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
Steiger, M., Bharucha, T. J., Venkatagiri, S., Riedl, M. J., & Lease, M. (2021, May). The psychological well-being of content moderators: the emotional labor of commercial moderation and avenues for improving support. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-14). [Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sukrit-Venkatagiri-3/publication/351417825_The_Psychological_Well-Being_of_Content_Moderators_The_Emotional_Labor_of_Commercial_Moderation_and_Avenues_for_Improving_Support/links/643cd781e881690c4bdd0ae2/The-Psychological-Well-Being-of-Content-Moderators-The-Emotional-Labor-of-Commercial-Moderation-and-Avenues-for-Improving-Support.pdf][Retrieved on: 12.01.2024]
