Introduction - Unilever's Sustainable Purchasing: A Case Study
This paper delves into the fundamental evaluation of Unilever's purchasing system, highlighting its important impact on the achievement of corporate goals and the recognition of a workable, environmentally friendly strategy. A well-designed procurement process is crucial because it may intricately interact with an organization's overall goals, cost-effectiveness objectives, and environmental responsibilities. A critical component of the exploration of a time when cost-effective strategies are essential for long-term success by organisations worldwide is the examination of Unilever's procuring system. This analysis aims to deconstruct the fundamental intricacies of Unilever's purchasing strategy, illuminating how it often prompts practical demands and aligns with the company's duty to ecological manageability. By inspecting Unilever's obtainment practices, this report attempts to offer nuanced pieces of information into the confounded congruity between corporate methodology, useful viability, and a green arrangement inside the various levelled framework, hence adding to a more significant perception of Unilever's sweeping business approach.
Company background
Unilever, a global purchaser merchandise organization, remains a paragon of supportability and accountable company policies. Laid out in 1930 through a consolidation of British soap maker Lever Brothers and Dutch margarine maker Margarine Unie, Unilever has developed into one of the world's biggest and most powerful FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods) organizations. With a varied item portfolio including food and drinks, cleaning specialists, beauty items, and individual consideration items, Unilever's presence traverses 190 nations. Prestigious for brands like Dove, Knorr, and Ben and Jerry's, Unilever puts areas of strength for on manageability through drives like the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (Plc, 2023). This aggressive arrangement centers around diminishing natural effects, upgrading social prosperity, and driving manageable development. Given Unilever's obligation to maintainability, a careful investigation of its obtainment technique becomes basic to comprehend how it lines up with the organization's more extensive targets and green plan (Plc, 2023).
Supply chain analysis
Unilever's logistics strategy is considered to be a sophisticated worldwide network that is inextricably tied to the company's devotion to environmentalism. Through the use of the Triple-A Supply Chain Framework, this research will explore the nuances of Unilever's distribution system and clarifies how the firm strikes a balance between position, responsiveness, and flexibility in its supply system. Furthermore, the analysis of Unilever's Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) tactics highlights the critical role cooperative alliances play in accomplishing environmentally conscious buying goals (Balasubramanian, 2014).
Triple-A Supply Chain Framework: Balancing Agility, Adaptability, and Alignment
The Triple-A Supply Chain Framework, designed by Hau L. Lee, is an essential methodology that underscores three key parts: Agility, Adaptability, and Alignment. This system fills in as an aide for associations looking to improve their supply chain management practices to address the difficulties of a dynamic and consistently changing business climate.
Agility: Agility with regards to the Triple-A Structure alludes to a store network's capacity to answer quickly to fast changes on the lookout, client requests, or interruptions. An agile inventory network is described by speedy navigation, adaptable assembling processes, and effective dissemination channels. Agility inside Unilever's supply network is seen in its ability to quickly answer market movements and dynamic shopper requests (Ahmed and Rashidi, 2021). The organization has put vigorously in cutting-edge innovations and data analytics, working with ongoing perceivability into its stock organization. This empowers Unilever to settle on speedy and informed choices, changing creation volumes, modifying item designs, and upgrading dispersion channels quickly. In the fast-moving client product business, where inclinations can change quickly, Unilever's agile supply chain guarantees it stays responsive and versatile to capricious changes, keeping an upper hand on the global business sector (Ahmed, 2021).
Adaptability within Unilever's Supply Chain: Unilever's obligation to maintain its adaptability. The organization embraces circular financial system standards and a green agenda, showing a proactive position in light of developing natural principles and purchaser assumptions. The adaptability within Unilever reaches out past tending to prompt difficulties, including a drawn-out vision that incorporates manageability into each feature of its inventory network. By ceaselessly advancing its practices, Unilever guarantees that its production network stays versatile notwithstanding disturbances and lined up with the organization's obligation to natural and social obligation (Kontopanou and Tsoulfas, 2022).
Alignment within Unilever's Supply Chain: Alignment is a foundation of Unilever's production network system, guaranteeing that each component amicably incorporates the organization's more extensive objectives. Unilever's obligation to the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan fills in as a directing power, adjusting production network choices to natural and social obligation benchmarks. The obtainment, creation, conveyance, and coordinated factors procedures inside Unilever's inventory network are planned not exclusively to meet prompt functional necessities but additionally to contribute fundamentally to the organization's all-encompassing obligation to maintainability. This arrangement not only fortifies Unilever's image as a mindful corporate element yet also guarantees an all-encompassing way to deal with accomplishing shared esteem (Gligor et al., 2020).
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Strategies at Unilever
Early Supplier Design Involvement at Unilever:Unilever decisively consolidates Early Supplier Design Involvement (ESDI) as a critical component of its SRM system. This approach involves connecting with providers in the beginning phases of item advancement, considering cooperative contributions from both parties. Unilever perceives that including providers from the initiation of item configuration encourages advancement, further develops item quality, and improves generally speaking effectiveness. By effectively looking for the aptitude and bits of knowledge of providers during the planning stage, Unilever means to upgrade item plans, decrease time-to-advertise, and guarantee that items fulfill or surpass quality guidelines. This cooperative methodology fortifies connections as well as adds to Unilever's obligation to maintainability by coordinating eco-accommodating practices and materials right off the bat in the design cycle (Yang, 2022).
Supplier Development Initiatives at Unilever: Unilever puts a very powerful focus on Supplier Development as a tactical support of its SRM tactics. This includes working intimately with vendors to improve their abilities, effectiveness, and adherence to Unilever's manageability principles. Through preparing programs, information-sharing meetings, and limit-building drives, Unilever effectively puts resources into the advancement of its providers. This cooperative methodology fortifies the general inventory network as well as guarantees that providers line up with Unilever's qualities and maintainability objectives. By helping providers in working on their cycles and capacities, Unilever makes a more vigorous and versatile stock organization. This technique lines up with the Triple-A Supply Chain Framework, especially the Adaptability part, as it guarantees that providers can develop close to Unilever because of changing business sector elements and manageability prerequisites (Nhu Laursen and Houman Andersen, 2023).
So, from the overall discussion it can be said that, Unilever's SRM efforts are firmly rooted in its dedication to environmentalism. For example, ethical standards are incorporated into the product manufacturing procedure right away in the supplier's design participation phase, guaranteeing that environmental and social variables are taken into account throughout the lifespan of the item. Similar to this, Unilever works with vendors to improve their approach to sustainability through supplier development initiatives, which are in line with the company's larger ethical and social objectives.
Analysis of procurement and purchasing concepts/theories
Social Exchange Theory in Unilever's Procurement Strategy:
Unilever's procurement strategy is profoundly impacted by the standards of the Social Exchange Theory, which sets that social collaborations include a corresponding trade of advantages, cultivating long-haul connections when the two players see esteem. With regards to Unilever's vendor connections, this hypothesis appears in the organization's obligation to joint effort, trust-constructing, and shared esteem creation. Unilever effectively draws in its providers straightforwardly and fairly, stressing open correspondence and common comprehension (Obloj and Zemsky, 2012). By supporting connections given correspondence, Unilever urges providers to go past value-based commitment, cultivating responsibility and faithfulness. This approach improves functional productivity as well as lines up with Unilever's more extensive obligation to manageability. From the perspective of the Social Exchange Theory, Unilever's obtainment procedure turns into a dynamic and commonly gainful cooperation, where both the organization and its providers add to one another's prosperity, making an establishment for long-haul, esteem-driven associations (Meulensteen, Vermeulen and Meerman, 2016).
Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) in Unilever's Procurement Strategy:
Unilever's procurement strategy mirrors the standards of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE), a system created by Oliver Williamson. TCE proposes that associations pick administration structures in light of limiting exchange costs related to market exchanges. For Unilever's situation, the organization decisively structures its acquisition connections to limit the expenses connected with looking for, arranging, and authorizing contracts(Wouters, 2006).
Unilever's inclination for long-haul associations and cooperative concurrences with key providers embodies TCE standards. By encouraging solid associations with believed vendors, Unilever looks to diminish vulnerability, data lopsidedness, and the requirement for broad legally binding arrangements. This essential methodology limits exchange costs that would be caused without trust and coordinated effort. The accentuation on social contracting and building organizations lines up with the flexibility part of the Triple-A Supply Chain Framework, guaranteeing a versatile and effective store network for Unilever while limiting value-based intricacies and expenses(Gibbons and Roberts, 2013).
Resource Dependence Theory:
According to the Resource Dependency Theory, the capacity of a company to survive and thrive depends on its ability to manage its reliance on outside resources. According to Pfeffer and Salancik's thesis, in order for an organisation to get vital resources like raw materials, information, and funding, it is necessary for them to proactively negotiate the world outside of them. By diversification the sources of their resources and building strategic connections with suppliers, consumers, and other participants, organisations aim to reduce reliance and susceptibility (Govindan, Shaw and Majumdar, 2021). Presently, about Unilever's procurement strategy, Resource Dependence Theory is apparent in the organization's endeavours to differentiate its provider base. Unilever perceives that over-dependence on a solitary provider or a restricted arrangement of assets can open the organization to dangers, for example, store network interruptions. By developing associations with a different exhibit of providers internationally, Unilever mitigates reliance on unambiguous assets and lessens weakness to outer shocks. This system lines up with the flexibility part of the Triple-A Production network Structure, guaranteeing that Unilever's obtainment rehearses improve the strength and manageability of its store network despite dynamic outside conditions(Pournader, Kach and Talluri, 2020).
Just-In-Time (JIT) Procurement:
Just-In-Time (JIT) procurement is a lean administration approach that underlines the convenient procurement and conveyance of merchandise to meet creation necessities without keeping up with extreme stock. Beginning with the Toyota Production System, JIT expects to limit squandering, diminish conveying expenses, and improve productivity. It depends on exact coordination among providers and makers to convey parts and materials unequivocally when required in the creation cycle, wiping out the requirement for enormous inventories. In Unilever's procurement strategy, JIT standards are vital for accomplishing functional effectiveness and manageability (Taghipour, Hoang and Cao, 2019). Unilever puts serious areas of strength in limiting waste and improving asset use, lining up with JIT's centre standards. By taking on JIT Procurement practices, Unilever can lessen abundance stock, lower holding expenses, and improve responsiveness to changing business sector requests. This approach not only lines up with the nimbleness part of the Triple-A Supply Chain Framework but also upholds Unilever's obligation to manageability by limiting ecological effect through decreased squander. Through JIT Procurement Unilever guarantees that its production network stays adaptable, versatile, and lined up with the organization's more extensive objectives of proficiency and maintainability in a quickly developing business scene(Germain and Dröge, 1997).
Unilever's procurement technique is a diverse methodology that coordinates different acquirement and buying ideas and hypotheses. The use of social Exchange Theory highlights the significance of cooperative and commonly gainful associations with vendors Furthermore, structures like Resource Dependence Theory, JIT procurement, and strategic sourcing aggregately add to the adequacy and supportability of Unilever's obtainment methodology. This extensive methodology lines up with the standards of the Triple-A Production Network System, stressing nimbleness, versatility, and arrangement for long-haul achievement and flexibility in a consistently developing business scene.
Relation to corporate-level strategy and other functional/operational-level strategies
Unilever's exception of In the Just-In-Time (JIT) procurement adjusts flawlessly with its corporate-level procedure and shows an all-encompassing difference across different utilitarian and functional levels. Utilizing the Wheelwright Model, which underlines arrangement among business and activities methodology, gives experiences into how JIT Procurement adds to Unilever's hierarchical goals and points of interaction with other useful techniques.
Corporate-Level Strategy:Unilever's overall corporate-level procedure spins around reasonable and dependable strategic policies. The organization has conceded to the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan, which incorporates natural and social supportability objectives. JIT Procurement assumes an essential part in supporting this system by limiting waste, lessening the overabundance of stock, and upgrading asset use. By smoothing out obtainment cycles and encouraging joint effort with providers, Unilever upgrades its general production network proficiency, adjusting JIT standards to its corporate obligation to manageability (Braun, 2015).
Business-Level Strategy - Wheelwright Model: The Wheelwright Model stresses the linkage among business and task techniques, and JIT Procurement fits with ease within Unilever's business-level system. Unilever works in the quick-shopper merchandise industry, where market elements and customer inclinations develop quickly. JIT Procurement permits Unilever to keep up with adaptability and responsiveness to changing business sector requests, guaranteeing that the organization's item contributions line up with customer assumptions. This reconciliation upholds Unilever's business-level technique of offering innovative and economical items in a cutthroat market (Seifzadeh and Rowe, 2019).
Functional and Operational-Level Strategies: At the functional level, JIT Procurement connects with other key functional methodologies inside Unilever. For example, the organization's emphasis on Total Quality Management (TQM) lines up with JIT standards by underscoring the significance of productive cycles, decreased faults, and consistent improvement. Furthermore, JIT procurement upholds Unilever's expense administration technique by limiting holding costs and working on general expense proficiency in the store network (Smith and Reece, 1998).
Furthermore, the incorporation of Just-In-Time (JIT) procurement process plays a crucial role in cultivating robust supplier relationships, which is consistent with Unilever's Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) approach. Because JIT procurement is cooperative, it fosters candid debate, reciprocal confidence, and comprehension with vendors, which helps to create a chain of custody that is flexible and robust.
Analysis of sustainability objectives and their relation to business level strategy
Sustainability is at the very front of Unilever's corporate procedure, embodied by its obligation to the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan. This examination dives into the maintainability needs of Unilever and inspects what its procurement methodology lines up with and means for the accomplishment of its green plan. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) model is utilized to give an extensive comprehension of the ecological effect of Unilever's obtaining system across the item life cycle. Unilever's manageability foremost concerns spin around further developing well-being and prosperity, decreasing natural effects, and upgrading livelihoods. The organization is focused on decoupling its development from ecological damage, making progress toward a positive social effect (Alkhodary, 2023). Through drives like the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan, Unilever focuses on dependable obtaining, squander decrease, and development to accomplish its maintainability goals. The organization intends to make a plan of action that encourages long-haul ecological and social manageability while addressing the necessities of the present without compromising people in the future. Likewise taking into account the Sourcing Strategy Impact on Green Agenda, Unilever's sourcing system fundamentally influences its green plan by focusing on mindful and economical practices across the inventory network (Bafas et al., 2023). From choosing ecologically cognizant providers to streamlining fabricating processes, Unilever guarantees diminished natural impressions. The obtaining methodology, lined up with the organization's obligation to a round economy, reaches out to circulation, bundling, and end-of-life contemplations. Through persistent improvement and development directed by maintainability standards, Unilever endeavours to limit its in general natural effect, encouraging a vigorous association between its obtaining methodology and the headway of its green plan (Teles and Sousa, 2014).
This piece of the review can be better assessed by utilizing the life cycle assessment model. The life cycle assessment model(LCA) is a broad instrument surveying the regular impact of a thing or organization through its entire life cycle. From unrefined substance extraction to creation, transport, and end-of-life, LCA assesses factors like resource use, spreads, and waste age. Applied by Unilever, it engages an extensive evaluation of practicality works, guiding key decisions to restrict environmental impressions. The LCA model backs Unilever's commitment to be aware of acquiring, capable of collecting, and round economy guidelines, ensuring a thorough understanding of the regular implications of its undertakings for taught, viable practices. Unrefined substance obtaining is a fundamental piece of Unilever's practicality framework, agreeing with its commitment to careful key strategies. The association puts centre strength on picking suppliers that stick to environmentally upright and moral rules (Gandrita et al., 2023). Through careful assessment and associations, Unilever guarantees that unrefined substance extraction processes are practical, limiting negative environmental effects. This incorporates evaluating elements like deforestation, water use, and biodiversity protection. By focusing on vendors with affirmations and maintainable practices, Unilever means to diminish its carbon impression and biological impression related to natural substance extraction. This sourcing system tends to ecological worries as well as adds to Unilever's general green plan. Moreover, Unilever participates in drives to help nearby networks, advancing social obligation inside its inventory network. Through nonstop improvement and development in natural substance obtaining, Unilever shows its obligation to make a strong, capable, and maintainable store network. This approach upholds the organization's more extensive targets of accomplishing a positive social effect, lessening natural mischief, and propelling its supportability needs to be illustrated in drives like the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan.
Unilever's way of dealing with manufacturing processes is essential in understanding its manageability objectives. The organization puts areas of strength on upgrading fabricating tasks to lessen ecological effects and improve general proficiency. Unilever puts resources into state-of-the-art innovations that further develop energy effectiveness, limit squandering, and lessen water utilization. By taking on lean and maintainable assembling rehearses, Unilever lessens functional expenses as well as exhibits a promise to dependable asset use. Endeavours to limit squandering in assembling add to Unilever's round economy drives. The organization centres around eco-accommodating creation strategies and investigates elective materials to decrease its biological impression. Also, Unilever incorporates supportability contemplations into item configuration, guaranteeing that assembling processes line up with the organization's green plan all along. Consistent improvement is a hallmark of Unilever's assembling procedure. The organization embraces development to improve supportability, whether through taking on sustainable power sources, executing cleaner creation strategies, or advancing store network coordinated operations. By tending to natural worries at the assembling stage, Unilever progresses its obligation to a more supportable and environmentally responsible plan of action, building up the mix of green standards into its functional system (Hristov, Chirico and Ranalli, 2021). Unilever's obligation to maintainability stretches out to its appropriation and bundling methodologies, pivotal parts in limiting its ecological effect. In circulation, Unilever centres around improving transportation organizations to decrease fossil fuel byproducts. Effective course arranging and transportation modes are chosen to diminish the natural impression related to item dispersion. In bundling, Unilever stresses lightweight and eco-accommodating materials to lessen material utilization and waste. The organization effectively looks for options in contrast to traditional bundling, consolidating reused materials and investigating creative, supportable bundling arrangements. This approach lines up with Unilever's objective of accomplishing a round economy by lessening the ecological effect of bundling all through its life cycle. In addition, Unilever plans to make its plastic bundling recyclable, reusable, or compostable by 2025. This responsibility highlights the organization's devotion to capable waste administration and a decrease in plastic contamination. The combination of manageable practices in dispersion and bundling lines up with Unilever's green plan as well as improves functional productivity and strength all through the store network, adding to the general supportability goals of the organization. Through these drives, Unilever shows a comprehensive way to deal with maintainable strategic policies, tending to ecological worries at each phase of its items' life cycle (Seifzadeh and Rowe, 2019).
Conclusion
Thus, it can be concluded from the above study that Unilever's supportability drives, profoundly implanted in its obtaining, assembling, dispersion, and bundling methodologies, represent an all-encompassing obligation to mindful strategic policies and ecological stewardship. The organization's manageability needs, as illustrated in the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan, highlight a devotion to further developing wellbeing, lessening natural effects, and upgrading occupations.
Recommendation
Although Unilever has achieved great progress in incorporating sustainability throughout its business practices, there is always room for improvement. In the beginning, in order to guarantee a thorough strategy, the business ought to maintain broadening the scope of its environmentally friendly sourcing projects and going transcend conventional commodities. Making investments in technology which allows comprehensive distribution chain monitoring and fortifying vendor cooperation may support environmentally friendly sourcing initiatives. Also, Unilever ought to strengthen its innovative work attempts to investigate inventive, eco-accommodating bundling options. This could include putting resources into biodegradable materials, limiting single-use plastics, and further propelling round economy standards. Also, the organization could heighten purchaser instruction and commitment projects to advance capable item removal.
Worried about poor grades due to unclear concepts?
Take control of your academic progress with high-quality Assignment Help that not only completes your tasks but also enhances your understanding. With detailed explanations and step-by-step solutions, these services are ideal for grasping even the toughest subjects while submitting impressive work on time
References
Ahmed, W. and Rashidi, M.Z., 2021. Developing supply chain risk management capabilities by aligning strategies: integrating Triple-A model. Measuring Business Excellence, [online] 26(3), pp.326–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-08-2020-0123.
Ahmed, W., 2021. Understanding alignment between lean and agile strategies using Triple-A model. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, [online] 71(5), pp.1810–1828. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-04-2020-0176.
Alkhodary, D., 2023. Integrating Sustainability into Strategic Management: a Path Towards Long-Term Business Success. International Journal of Professional Business Review, [online] 8(4), p.e01627. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1627.
Bafas, S.A., Alexandropoulou, A.P., Fousteris, A.E., Didaskalou, E.A. and Georgakellos, D.A., 2023. Sustainable Development and Business Strategies: An Exploratory Study of Greek Businesses. Businesses, [online] 3(3), pp.441–459. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3030027.
Balasubramanian, S., 2014. A structural analysis of green supply chain management enablers in the UAE construction sector. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, [online] 19(2), p.131. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlsm.2014.064655.
Braun, A., 2015. How the operational level managers influence the corporate level strategies and their collective successful implementation. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance ISSN 2394-3351, [online] 2(10), p.9. https://doi.org/10.19085/journal.sijbpg021002.
Gandrita, D.M., Gandrita, A., Rosado, D.P. and Carmo, M. do, 2023. Environmental Sustainability for Strategic Planning Effectiveness and Organizational Improvement. Sustainability, [online] 15(8), p.6774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086774.
Germain, R. and Dröge, C., 1997. Effect of just-in-time purchasing relationships on organizational design, purchasing department configuration, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, [online] 26(2), pp.115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(96)00113-7.
Gibbons, R.S. and Roberts, J., 2013. The Handbook of Organizational Economics. [online] Princeton University Press. Available at: <http://books.google.ie/books?id=oefuRkdcNSsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=1400845351&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api>.
Gligor, D., Feizabadi, J., Russo, I., Maloni, M.J. and Goldsby, T.J., 2020. The triple-a supply chain and strategic resources: developing competitive advantage. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, [online] 50(2), pp.159–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2019-0258.
Govindan, K., Shaw, M. and Majumdar, A., 2021. Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 279, p.123075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123075.
Hristov, I., Chirico, A. and Ranalli, F., 2021. Corporate strategies oriented towards sustainable governance: advantages, managerial practices and main challenges. Journal of Management and Governance, [online] 26(1), pp.75–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-021-09581-x.
Kontopanou, M. and Tsoulfas, G., 2022. Analyzing new ways to adapt the Triple-A Supply Chain model and its extensions in agri-food supply chains. Logforum, [online] 18(3), pp.285–295. https://doi.org/10.17270/j.log.2022.735.
Meulensteen, T.M., Vermeulen, W.J.V. and Meerman, S., 2016. Creating shared value in the buyer-supplier relationship through the implementation of sustainability requirements. Global Business and Economics Review, [online] 18(6), p.656. https://doi.org/10.1504/gber.2016.079410.
Nhu Laursen, L. and Houman Andersen, P., 2023. Resource and supplier interaction in network innovation governance: The case of innovating at Unilever. Journal of Business Research, [online] 156, p.113465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113465.
Obloj, T. and Zemsky, P.B., 2012. Value Creation and Value Capture with Agency: The Micro-Foundations of Buyer-Supplier Relationships. SSRN Electronic Journal. [online] https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159033.
Plc, U., 2023. At a glance. [online] Unilever. Available at: <https://www.unilever.com/our-company/at-a-glance/>.
Plc, U., 2023. Our company. [online] Unilever. Available at: <https://www.unilever.com/our-company/>.
Pournader, M., Kach, A. and Talluri, S. (Sri), 2020. A Review of the Existing and Emerging Topics in the Supply Chain Risk Management Literature. Decision Sciences, [online] 51(4), pp.867–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12470.
Seifzadeh, P. and Rowe, W.G., 2019. The role of corporate controls and business-level strategy in business unit performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, [online] 12(3), pp.364–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-10-2018-0114.
Smith, T.M. and Reece, J.S., 1998. The relationship of strategy, fit, productivity, and business performance in a services setting. Journal of Operations Management, [online] 17(2), pp.145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00037-0.
Taghipour, A., Hoang, P. and Cao, X., 2019. Just in Time/Lean Purchasing Approach: An Investigation for Research and Applications. Journal of Advanced Management Science, [online] pp.43–48. https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.8.2.43-48.
Teles, M. de F. and Sousa, J.F. de, 2014. Environmental Management and Business Strategy: Structuring the Decision-Making Support in a Public Transport Company. Transportation Research Procedia, [online] 3, pp.155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.101.
Wouters, M., 2006. Implementation costs and redistribution mechanisms in the economic evaluation of supply chain management initiatives. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, [online] 11(6), pp.510–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540610703909.
Yang, X., 2022. Vertical Coopetition: Effect of Supplier Relationship Management Strategies on Supplier Involvement in New Product Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [online] pp.1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3192181.
