Pages: 20
Words: 4926
Native Assignment Help provides assignment help to assist students in the research, writing and proofreading process.
The bridge is one of the most important structural components that has many uses in the daily life of transportation and the system of construction engineering. Mainly there are lots of systems that have many applications in the system of construction also construction is not that type of easy. To transport various types of vehicles from one side to another or to transport the system over any river it's necessary to construct the bridge in a manner and a system of fast traveling. There are lots of systems and there are plenty of different types of construction methods. There are lots of materials that need to be structurally sound in the manner of the system. This particular assignment needs to compare the system of the construction of the stipulated two bridges in the system of the constructional aspect and the design aspect of the matter. The discussion will be according to the comparison of the two bridges Fred Hartman Bridge and Millau viaduct.
Discussion
If the consideration of the difference of the two types of bridges that generally applied in the construction as per the requirement and as per the demand of the locality and the client, there could be plenty of options that can be provided in the difference. Many systems that can be applicable in a particular system of construction have the system in the process that many systems have possible of different types of materials and different types of the load resistance property (Zheng et al 2019). In the system of comparison, the discussion system has many possibilities and many problems can occur. There could be many differences created according to the usage and the construction materials of the bridge so according to the construction material angle. The two types of bridge could be analysed as the Cable Bridge and Cantilever bridge.
Disadvantages
The Bridge was constructed in Texas USA from 1986 to 1996 to join the Baytown and La Porte. The bridge is a constructional system of a cablestayed bridge and has a system of different types of the system of different types of spans but the allover span of the bridge is a different system of calculation and there is mainly the system of comparison of the structural details (Zhou et al 2020). Consists of a span of the 381 m in the main span there are lots of continuous systems of the symmetrically support system in the possibility Consists of the lots of the system in the possibility of the concrete pier and there are lots of anchor porters connected in the past of the 305 mm diameter in the system.
Figure 1: Fred Hartman Bridge
In this system, the system if the structural design has been considered then the system of the bridge deck is as large as the system of the possibility of the equal direction of the system of the possibility. Steel is required to be placed either diagonally and each direction placed horizontally in the system. Considering vertical stiffness which is one of the most important systems in this system that have the possibility in the space of restraining the load. Also, there is a structural roadway of the concrete which is 200mm thick in the present scenario of the bridge. Also, there are lots of systems that can be present in a particular way (Invernizzi et al 2019). The Cable anchorage way distance is 15.2m. If the summary of the particular system needs to be considered in the system that possibility can be systemized in the system. If summarized the total design system then it's been visible.
This is also a bridge of the system of cable restraining in the system of retaining the load, the same type of bridge that has many possibilities in the system of the conclusions. As per the general information of the system, the beginning of construction started around the time of 2001 and it has an end of the work around 2004, which takes only the stipulated 38 months to the completion of the particular job(Sheng et al 2021 ).
This job is a multiplespanbased cable bridge that has many types in the system of the application. Located in France, the system of the bridge is over the Tarn River in the city adjoining a 75meter motorway that is related to the information center of Milan. Considering the technical information of the particular bridge the total length is given as 2460m Total span length of the particular system span length of the particular deck is given as 204m for each. Each of the pier heights is about 94 to 244 meters according to the requirements of the heights that need to sustain the bridge in the particular system (Alocci and Valvo 2019). There are lots of systems in the design specification of the data and there are lots of the systems in there. According to the system of the design, there are lots of concrete systems near about 13000 m3 and there is a reinforcing system of the possibility of 1300 t in the foundation. There are many systems in the projections. The total concrete volume in the pyres is 53000m3. The stay cables that are needed in the system are 1500t in the connection of the system. There are lots of other systems that have the system possibility of the particular systematics. The total cost of the given project that needs to be implemented is 300 Million euros.
If considering the design summary and short briefing of the system of this particular bridge then the data will get
In the above system of the minimal comparison of the bridge and the system of the possibility of the particular system of the short briefing of the bridge and there are lots of the systems in the possibility that there are many systems of the calculation of the design data in the system has many aspects in the system of the possibility in the system and there are many drawing and the annotation and the analytical calculation of the system of the construction that have many aspects of the system(Sheng et al 2021). If considering the types of the system of the bridge that has been allocated and discussed above with the system of the completion then this kind of bridge is said to be a Cable suspension bridge.
Every construction has the system of the concepts of the system of design implementation, the design data, and the design specification (Pu et al 2019). As per the completion system, there are lots of issues and problems with the system. To consider the design and the analysis everyone should have an idea of the system of the application in the system and there are lots of options that need to be answered during the design of the particular system of the application in the implementation of the design. Mainly these two cable bridges that have a briefing in the system of the application on the construction the available notice data and the system of the application of the construction materials as per the requirements needs to be inserted in the system of the application (Zhou et al 2018). Also, the application of the cost in the particular way of fitting needs to be implemented in the system.
Figure2: Design process thinking
In this system of construction, two types of cable bridge construction are constructed in their stipulated time span. There are lots of systems in the design briefing. As the summary of the construction is given earlier there are lots of systems that need to be implemented in the way of the system. In the system of the application, the bridge deck span length of both systems span over 300 meters. If we considered the application and the design application of the system. If the differentials are noted in the system of the comparison table then lots of the design briefing and the data will come out.
Property 
Fred Hartman Bridge 
Millau Viaduct 
Year of construction 
19861995 
16.10.200114.12.2004 
Location 
Bay town and La Porte Texas 
Millau, France, and Creissels 
Project type 
Cable stayed bridge with fan system 
Cable stayed bridge 
cost 
$ 91.3 million that have total application 
Euro 300000000 
Participants 
Texas city council of transport 
Republic of France the administration of the highway and the traffic control board. 
Total Length 
4185m 
2460m 
Main span 
381m 
342 
Length 
146.9381.0146.8 
204m342m204m 
Deck width 
47m 
32.050 
Wind load 
47m/s 

Live load 
17 tons 
100MN 
Pylon Height 
129.84 
88.92m(above deck) 343m(max above ground) 
Materials 
Reinforced and Steel structure and Pre stressed concrete in pier and the Deck 
Steel girder deck. Prefabrication in the system of their system of cast in situ method concrete at pier. Steel girder is made in the factory 
Deck Construction type 
Reinforced cement concrete with 20mm dia of steel bars 
Steel rebar girder 
Deck approach Viaduct 
Reinforced cement concrete with 16 mm dia steel bars 
Reinforced cement concrete 
Pire details 
18 mm dia with 15 mm crosswise across the span and the system. Minimum 2.2% of the reinforcement of the application 
Varying cross section of the piers Movement of the system by prefabrication in the system in the place. Almost 2100 stiffness panels in the system.75 welders needed in the preassembling of the system. 
Cable details 
15.2mm 25mm clear span 
1500 ton carbon steel fiber used 
Road construction details 
100 mm thick wearing layer 
300 mm tick wearing layer 
Girder distance 
400 
350 m 
Slab thickness 
200mm 

Torsional stiffness 
5.4m 
6.6 
Foundation bearing capacity 
Alluvial soil in the channel , bars of the system is 40 mm bearing capacity 200 t 
Moderate system of the soil bearing capacity is said to be 250 t 
Table: Comparison of the Design data
In the system of the design data there are various types of the system that have the possibility that there is a system of the structural differences in their system of the calculation of the system. The main difference between the structural ability in both of the bridges in the system is that the Fred Hartman Bridge is constructed as a reinforced cement concrete bridge in the system for the constructional materials purpose (Yang et al 2020). Also there are lots of the design implementation and the possibility of the different challenges that need to be considered in the particular project, one of the above is that is more important is the soil capacity that has many delays because of the alluvial soil. As Texas is a very populated city there are lots of systems that need to be inserted in the system as there is some design data that needs to be consulted as below.
The Millau Viaduct has almost the same system and the category of the construction, just the difference of the implemented materials and the system of the application that have many perspectives of the design data that have many assumptions in the system of the application in the construction. This is also a Multi span cable stay bridge with a semi fan system attached in the process. Located in the Millau and the joining of Creissels the bridge is constructed to be a part of the motorway 75 in the system of the application.
Figure3: Cost Control Process
The bridge is said to be in the light weight system of the slenderness of the beam as the system is viable to 36 tons against 120 tons. Also there is data that had been found as the 43 tons of the steel is already fabricated in the system of the fabrication, at the lower and the auxiliary pillars that had been installed in the system. If considered the critical data that had been found that
Conclusion
As the data has been received in the system there are lots of the system. Basically in the possibility in the system of the construction things needs to be system. There are many things that have to be taken into consideration according to system information. In the critical analysis of the system there are lots of the system in the bridges that are compared in the analysis in the system. If we consider the cost of the different bridge then the system is considered the cost of the construction of the Fred Hartman Bridge is 92 million dollar whereas the cost of the cost of Millau Viaduct is 314 million dollar. For the design of the particular system of the bridge, there are lots of systems that need to be commenced like what will be the span of the bridge? What is the design of the deck, what will be the particular design application of the load, and what is the system of load definition of the system, also what is necessary and the location of the bridge that needs to be constructed in the place.
References
Journals
Alocci, C. and Valvo, P.S., 2019. Feasibility study of a hybrid FRPsteel cablestayed pedestrian swing bridge. Engineering Structures, 189, pp.359372.
Graybeal, B., Brühwiler, E., Kim, B.S., Toutlemonde, F., Voo, Y.L. and Zaghi, A., 2020. International perspective on UHPC in bridge engineering. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 25(11), p.04020094.
Han, Q., Wen, J., Du, X. and Huang, C., 2019. Seismic response of single pylon cablestayed bridge under scour effect. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(6), p.05019007.
Invernizzi, S., Montagnoli, F. and Carpinteri, A., 2019. Fatigue assessment of the collapsed XXth Century cablestayed Polcevera Bridge in Genoa. Procedia Structural Integrity, 18, pp.237244.
Javanmardi, A., Ghaedi, K., Huang, F., Hanif, M.U. and Tabrizikahou, A., 2021. Application of structural control systems for the cables of cablestayed bridges: stateoftheart and stateofthepractice. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, pp.131.
Li, S., Dezfuli, F.H., Wang, J.Q. and Alam, M.S., 2018. Displacementbased seismic design of steel, FRP, and SMA cable restrainers for isolated simply supported bridges. J. Bridge Eng, 23(6), p.04018032.
Nzarpour, V. and Gholizadeh, S., 2023. DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF CABLESTAYED BRIDGES USING MOMENTUM SEARCH ALGORITHM. Iran University of Science & Technology, 13(1),
Pu, Q., Liu, J., Gou, H., Bao, Y. and Xie, H., 2019. Finite element analysis of longspan railcumroad cablestayed bridge subjected to ship collision. Advances in structural engineering, 22(11), pp.25302542.
Pu, Q., Liu, J., Gou, H., Bao, Y. and Xie, H., 2019. Finite element analysis of longspan railcumroad cablestayed bridge subjected to ship collision. Advances in structural engineering, 22(11), pp.25302542.
Sacks, R., Kedar, A., Borrmann, A., Ma, L., Brilakis, I., Hüthwohl, P., Daum, S., Kattel, U., Yosef, R., Liebich, T. and Barutcu, B.E., 2018. SeeBridge as next generation bridge inspection: overview, information delivery manual and model view definition. Automation in Construction, 90, pp.134145.
Sheng, X., Zheng, W., Zhu, Z., Yan, A. and Qin, Y., 2021. Ganjiang Bridge: A highspeed railway longspan cablestayed bridge laying ballastless tracks. Structural Engineering International, 31(1), pp.4044.
Sheng, X., Zheng, W., Zhu, Z., Yan, A. and Qin, Y., 2021. Ganjiang Bridge: A highspeed railway longspan cablestayed bridge laying ballastless tracks. Structural Engineering International, 31(1), pp.4044.
Wang, X., Wang, L., Wang, H., Ning, Y., Huang, K. and Wang, W., 2022. Performance evaluation of a longspan cablestayed bridge using nondestructive field loading tests. Applied Sciences, 12(5), p.2367.
Yang, Y., Wang, X. and Wu, Z., 2020, June. Life cycle cost analysis of FRP cables for longspan cable supported bridges. In Structures (Vol. 25, pp. 2434). Elsevier.
Yang, Y., Wang, X. and Wu, Z., 2020, June. Life cycle cost analysis of FRP cables for longspan cable supported bridges. In Structures (Vol. 25, pp. 2434). Elsevier.
Zhang, J., Zhang, M., Jiang, X., Yuan, R., Yu, J., Zhou, Y. and Qin, S., 2022, March. Causes and control to lateral displacement of the main girder in the superlongspan cablestayed bridge with transverse asymmetry dead load. In Structures (Vol. 37, pp. 168184). Elsevier.
Zheng, Z. and Ding, N., 2019, May. Design and implementation of ccrobotii: a palmbased cable climbing robot for cablestayed bridge inspection. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 97479753). IEEE.
Zheng, Z., Yuan, X., Huang, H., Yu, X. and Ding, N., 2018, July. Mechanical design of a cable climbing robot for inspection on a cablestayed bridge. In 2018 13th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (WCICA) (pp. 16801684). IEEE.
Zhou, M., Lu, W., Song, J. and Lee, G.C., 2018. Application of ultrahigh performance concrete in bridge engineering. Construction and Building Materials, 186, pp.12561267.
Zhou, Z., Alcalá, J. and Yepes, V., 2020. Bridge carbon emissions and driving factors based on a lifecycle assessment case study: Cablestayed bridge over Hun He river in Liaoning, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), p.5953.
Go Through the Best and FREE Samples Written by Our Academic Experts!
Native Assignment Help. (2024). Retrieved from:
https://www.nativeassignmenthelp.co.uk/advancedstructuraldesignandbridgeengineering20662
Native Assignment Help, (2024),
https://www.nativeassignmenthelp.co.uk/advancedstructuraldesignandbridgeengineering20662
Native Assignment Help (2024) [Online]. Retrieved from:
https://www.nativeassignmenthelp.co.uk/advancedstructuraldesignandbridgeengineering20662
Native Assignment Help. (Native Assignment Help, 2024)
https://www.nativeassignmenthelp.co.uk/advancedstructuraldesignandbridgeengineering20662
Is a Nursing Student a Registered Nurse in...View or download sample
Unit Qf 708 Strategic Marketing Assignment {{TEXT2}} INTRODUCTION Strategic...View or download sample
Health Policy and Social Trends Assignment 1. Introduction Of Health...View or download sample
MicroRNA's Role in Endometriosis: A Systematic Literature Review Explore the...View or download sample
M&S's Strategic Analysis, Leadership Style & CSR...View or download sample
Introduction Of Business law Assignment sample {{TEXT2}} The lecture by lord...View or download sample
Get your doubts & queries resolved anytime, anywhere.
Receive your order within the given deadline.
Get original assignments written from scratch.
Highlyqualified writers with unmatched writing skills.
Hi! We're here to answer your questions! Send us message, and we'll reply via WhatsApp
Please enter a messagePleae enter your phone number and we'll contact you shortly via Whatsapp
We will contact with you as soon as possible on whatsapp.
Ph.D. Writers For Best Assistance
Plagiarism Free
No AI Generated Content
offer valid for limited time only*