Expert Assignment Help UK: Rokaro Probity Game for Academic Integrity Assignment Sample

Expert Assignment Help UK: Rokaro Probity Game for Academic Integrity

Are you looking for Expert Assignment Writers in the UK? Native Assignment Help boasts a team of highly qualified writers who are ready to assist you with your academic needs. With our commitment to excellence, you can rest assured that your assignments are in good hands.

Introduction - Promoting Academic Integrity Through an Educational Card Game

Slide 1:

• Game Instruction

For two or more players such as a student and the professor.. Rokaro Probity is one kind of card game. It is a specialty done for each and every student. This game will also help to improve the student's knowledge for academic misconduct and plagiarism.

• The game Object

The main goal of the game is to make the student’s understand the importance of academic integrity. It is truly important to make all the students understand the importance of academic integrity. The game will mainly have several questions and depending on the student answer all the students will start to understand the value of academic integrity. The major objective of the game is to avoid any kind of misconduct at the time of exam. It will also help many students to avoid plagiarism in school assignments. The primary issues of one student mainly occurs when plagiarism or copy paste issues occurs on their assignment. This game will help users to decrease the plague in their assignment. 

• Game functionality

 National tree of the game is basically one professor and also will have one student. The professor will have 10 ethic cards. This entire card will have 10 questions. And the opposite site will contain the answer of that particular question. The academic misconduct prevention is the actual need to implement the game. The game procedure is like the student mainly keeps the hand of three cars terribly basically letters a b and c card and the selection of the card will physically represent the answer of each questions at the time of the game. In this game the professor will be physically present and the students will also physically present the professor will pick the card randomly that 3 cards will be placed in one table and also the professor will choose the three random cards from 10 cards. After choosing those three cards the speaker of the professor will loudly read the questions which will help all the players to listen to the questions properly. Then after that the players or the student has to choose one card which mainly consists of the answer what actually the considered it will be and the student have to keep it hidden as the rule is whatever the question answers will choose the student the other students should not watch the answer of the particular question. After that the student has to choose another cut from those three but they cannot change the first cut of the pic and also depending on the other players answer they will decide the answer. When all the students will choose the answer then the student can only reveal the particular card to their professor in this scenario the professor will actually read the proper answer which is actually written on the backside of the teddy with card if the students of the player select the correct answer then the student will receive 10 points and in case the student answer the questions wrong then the student won't get any points. All the fundamentals are the part of round 1 second round all the students will collect all the cards in their hand. Will be asking one question from that particular Karan the students will choose the answer and all this process will end until all the answers and also the questions are and also get clarified to all the students’ full stop. The students with the highest score will count as a winner of the g

Importance of Academic integrity in one University

One of the most interesting aspects of registering inside a degree programmer at a UK institution is being a member of the academic community. This group brings along students, instructors, scientists, and other staff who really are committed to learning, educating, and research success. You'll find people talk about the significance of 'academic honesty' inside this academic world, but it's essential and important people understand what something implies. Good teaching is a collection of values which should be adhered to everything that you do. Everyone of your education and student work should indeed be driven by it and promoted by such ideals. Institutions in the United Kingdom take academic honesty highly seriously and it will provide students with information and support during your education. Many offer seminars, video classes, and one help, and some give prospective students academic honesty tests and they may obtain feedback on their present skills and understanding. Dissertations, reports, case analysis, and dissertation all are instances of scholarly work that can be difficult to complete. Students should express ideas and information in the proper language and vocabulary, and also demonstrate analytical reasoning. That means you should conduct studies and/or read a present job on a subject prior to developing the own thesis and results. Students should acknowledge whenever thoughts or facts originate from somebody while completing your assignment.

To prevent plagiarism, students should finish the work correctly. It'd be considered copying, for instance, if you were using another’s thoughts like if they had been the original before recognizing them. Copying is taken very seriously in college and is regarded as a scholastic offence. Learners are responsible for knowing and complying to the regulations. It's indeed important that users cite your sources at all occasions. Expositions, reports, case studies, and these are all examples of in-depth work that might be difficult to complete. Understudies should express their ideas and facts in proper language and jargon, as well as demonstrate scientific reasoning. That is to say, before advancing your own hypothesis and results, you should conduct research and study current work on the subject. While completing your duty, understudies should be aware of when notions or realities arise from others. Understudies should do the task correctly to avoid counterfeiting.

It would be considered duplicating, for example, if you used another's thoughts as if they were the first before recalling them. Replicating is taken very seriously in school and is considered a significant academic infraction. Students are responsible for understanding and agreeing to the rules. It's undeniably important that your clients refer to your sources at all times. Having intellectual integrity is important for a long time. To begin with, academic respectability indicates that people may put their faith in you. Individuals with whom you have a business relationship know that they can trust you to perform honestly and accomplish what you say you will do. Individuals trust you when they see that you are confident in making the greatest decision and that your actions are consistent with that belief. Furthermore, one of the most important characteristics of a successful pioneer is trust. By being direct, sensible, and dependable, for example, these people get a lot of notoriety. People who are successful in business recognize the benefits of acting with integrity. Our ability to trust one another determines our reality (at least in the business community). As a result, developing strong moral proclivities now, while you are still in school, will benefit you when you reach the workforce and confront moral challenges. Second, having intellectual integrity is crucial since it provides some motivation to your certification. Managers like to choose graduates who they believe have a high level of close-to-home morality. They would rather invest in developing the human resources of someone who would have a good impact on the business and whom they can trust to achieve the organization’s main aim. Finally, scholastic trustworthiness is crucial since it may provide you with inner peace by demonstrating that you value making the correct option and continuously Endeavour to behave consistently with those convictions. Acting honestly may relieve a lot of unnecessary stress in your life, making you happier, better, and more valuable. Students who commit intellectual integrity violations are barred from working at Bauer and from participating in some special academic initiatives. Workers who establish clear standards for tasks and evaluating understudy work, as well as understudies who prepare work that is simple, insightful, and certifiable, help to build trust. Schools that establish clear and dependable scholastic beliefs, execute their standards consistently and fairly, and assist legitimate and fair exploration build trust. Being dependable and allowing one to believe others are frequently linked at the hip when it comes to building trust.

Academic work requires the creation of trust. We would only be able to base fresh demands in the assessment of others and move on with confidence if we had trust. With confidence, move on. We can do more because we have faith in each other. collaborating, sharing data, and allowing new ideas to flow. Without fear of our work being seized, we may think freely. Our occupations were hampered, or our notoriety was diminished. In the foundation of moral networks, reasonable treatment is a critical component. Consistency, straightforwardness, and obvious, reasonable assumptions are all important components of reasonableness. Reasonableness also includes predictable and limited responses to untrustworthiness and respectability lapses. Reasonable, accurate, and fair-minded assessment plays an important role in instructional cycles, and reasonableness in reviewing and evaluating is crucial for the establishment of trust among employees and understudies. Employees and organizations have the right to expect fair treatment from both understudies and one another.

 Understudies are accountable to one another and to the community when they complete their own job honestly, recognize acquired work correctly, respect and preserve scholastic integrity techniques, and maintain the institution's high standing. Employees are reasonable for understudies and foundations when they communicate expectations clearly, respond to unethical behavior consistently, uphold scholastic trustworthiness standards without fail, and demonstrate others how to do it on a consistent basis. When overseers provide clear, worthwhile, and just approaches that aid establish and preserve trust networks, and treat understudies, the workforce, the graduating class, and foundations with respect, they are reasonable for their networks.

 Academic people groups succeed when there is respect for local people and the various and sometimes disparate suppositions that they convey. The most unique and beneficial learning environments are those that foster dynamic commitment, such as comprehensive testing, lively discussion, and ardent disagreements over ideas balanced by respect for those who express them. Even those who disagree on reality share respect and love for information and the methods by which it is acquired in scholarly settings of dependability. Understudies show respect when they value and take advantage of opportunities to learn new things by doing a good job in their own education, contributing to conversations as well as listening to others' points of view, and performing well. Being insensitive, insulting, or bothersome to others sabotages respectable environments. Personnel show respect by actually listening to their understudies' ideas, remembering them as persons, helping them develop their ideas, providing thorough and fair feedback on their work, and respecting their points of view and aims.

• Skills used for the purpose of producing the game

Academic

Research

Writing

Paraphrasing

Organizing

Designing

PowerPoint

Slide 2:

Question 1: On the option is it proper to borrow the assignment via online and submit as like own work?

1. A) Yes
2. B) No
3. C) Inform the teacher at first.

Ans. No

Question 2: Is it really necessary to make interference with the resources used in the assignment?

1. A) Yes
2. B) No
3. C) Books only

Ans. No

Question 3: what can actually be considered as misconduct?

1. A) Coping and pasting
2. B) One or more than one working in one assignment together.
3. C) Coping the work of others.

Ans B.

Question 4: Which one can someone copy in the assignment without using referencing?

1. A) Newspaper article
2. B) Magazine’s page
3. C) None

Ans A

Question 5 At the time of paraphrasing it is really necessary to know the name of the students?

1. A) Yes
2. B) No

Ans. B

Slide 3:

Question 1 Which one is bribing?

1. A) Using mobile at the time of exam.
2. B) None
3. C) Give money to teacher for passing in the exam

Ans. C

Question 2: unauthorized mobile use at the time of exam mainly consists of??

1. A) Cheating
2. B) Plagiarism
3. C) Sabotage

Ans A

Question 3 One picture is taken from one website. Is it really necessary to provide the actual resources?

1. A) Yes
2. B) No

Ans A

Question 4 Can the student use a paraphrasing tool?

1. A) Yes
2. B) No

Ans B

Question 5 What is the maximum amount of plagi one assignment can have?

1. A) 10%
2. B) 20%
3. C) 5%

Ans A.

References

Dawson, P., 2020. Defending assessment security in a digital world: preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.

Stoesz, B.M. and Los, R., 2019. Evaluation of a tutorial designed to promote academic integrity. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 2(1), pp.3-26.

MacLeod, P.D. and Eaton, S.E., 2020. The paradox of faculty attitudes toward student violations of academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), pp.347-362.

Ahmed, K., 2020. Academic integrity: Challenges and strategies for Asia and the Middle East. Accountability in research, 27(5), pp.256-270.

Sefcik, L., Striepe, M. and Yorke, J., 2019. Mapping the landscape of academic integrity education programs: what approaches are effective?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Burger, A., 2018. Reframing anti-plagiarism efforts in the academic library. Georgia Library Quarterly, 55(1), p.11.

Wong, E.Y., Kwong, T. and Pegrum, M., 2018. Learning on mobile augmented reality trails of integrity and ethics. Research and practice in technology-enhanced learning, 13(1), pp.1-20.

Stoesz, B.M. and Yudintseva, A., 2018. Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: a synthesis paper. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), pp.1-22.

Eaton, S.E. and Edino, R.I., 2018. Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: A review of the research literature and call to action. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), pp.1-21.

Simola, S., 2017. Managing for academic integrity in higher education: Insights from behavioral ethics. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(1), p.43.

Griffiths, M.D. and Pontes, H.M., 2019. The future of gaming disorder research and player protection: what role should the video gaming industry and researchers play?. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, pp.1-7.

Denisova-Schmidt, E., 2017. The challenges of academic integrity in higher education: Current trends and prospects.