Executive Summary
The multidisciplinary team includes a group of various types of healthcare workers belonging to different streams and working together to treat a patient. The study highlighted that within the working of South Rotherton, a good MDT must be followed. This is crucial because it includes healthcare professionals working together and providing better services to the patient and care-seeker. The methodology of the current study highlighted that 86 different characteristics of the effective MDT are present, and with the help of observational measurement, it was found that only 18 of these characteristics are used by South Rotherton. Further, it was identified that the rating system included a four-point rating system, which started with very poor to very good for rating the different types of characteristics that are present. At last, the findings included the discussion relating to the challenges faced in managing MDT. The most common challenges highlighted were lack of proper communication, confusion in the roles decided and others. Also, it was recommended to South Rotherton that they must try to improve their communication system so that MDT can manage the work better. Further, South Rotherton states that they must have a clear management structure with proper division of accountability and responsibility of every member of MDT.
Reference materials and samples are provided to clarify the assessment structure and intended learning outcomes. Through our Assignment Help UK, guidance is offered while maintaining originality and ethical academic practice. The SH5053 Summative Assessment Sample illustrates the expected academic standard, critical analysis, and application of theoretical concepts aligned with module requirements. These materials are shared strictly for academic learning, guidance, and reference purposes, while supporting originality and ethical academic practice.
Results And Findings
With the help of the above analysis of the literature and the findings, it is clear that compliance with the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) is very crucial for providing better treatment to the patients coming in South Rotherton’s Integrated Care System. This is crucial because when the teamwork within the healthcare setting then good services are provided to service users (Mihailov et al, 2024). With the finding, it was analysed that in the survey, 86 characteristics of the effective MDT were listed, and with the help of the independent observational research, it was analysed that 18 from the all 86 traits were noticeable in the staff of South Rotherton. This simply means that the effective MDT was not utilised by South Rotherton, and ultimately, it affects the working capability of the setting. Moreover, the finding also evaluated that within the setting, there are certain challenges which impact effective teamwork, and because of this, MDT is not appropriately working. These barriers include issues like difficulty communicating clearly, differences within professional roles and many other different types of issues.
According to the views of Staudt (2022), when there is a lack of clear communication, the team is not able to work efficiently. For example, two people are working on the same patient, and they do not have communication among them, then there are chances that there is duplication of task and it can also affect the treatment provided to the patient. Hence, the major reason for the decreased role of MDT is the lack of communication. It is because for effective teamwork the most common and useful things is the communication. When the communication within the team is not good, then they will not be able to manage the work. As a result, the coordination among the team members will not be good, and this will further result in inefficient patient outcomes.
The finding also evaluated that another challenge includes the absence of the common incentives as within the team some of the common incentives are not provided. This is a major negative cause because when some motivation will not be provided to the employees, then they will not be working well within the setting. Maharaj et al, (2021) contended that when appropriate, the incentives and other motivators are not provided, the working capability of the whole MDT will be affected. Hence, it is mandatory for the healthcare setting to provide better incentives and other non-financial motivators as well. In case the appropriate type of motivators is provided, then it will guide the employee to attain all the objectives effectively.
Moreover, the findings reflected that there is also confusion relating to the different roles which are performed within the team. This also creates a challenge while managing the MDT as when there is confusion relating to the task that needs to be performed by the team members, then it can create issues and as a result of this the working of South Rotherton will be impacted. The reason for this is that there is no clear communication present within the team, and ultimately, it can create issues relating to the roles assigned (Hibberson, Lawton and Whitehead, 2021). Thus, it is the responsibility of all the team members they work with interprofessional collaboration and coordination. This is crucial because when coordination is not present, the whole team will not be able to work effectively. On the other side, Popat et al, (2021) stated that this situation needs to be managed well, as for better MDT work, collaborative practice must be followed. With compliance with good coordinated working, the MDT can be improved within South Rotherton.
Moreover, Willis et al, (2022) also stated that the successful working of MDT will result in providing better and comprehensive care, and this will be assisting South Rotherton in providing better services to the patient. Also, another benefit of improving MDT will be that it will foster positive patient outcomes and will be able to recover well. On the other side, He et al, (2021) argued that when MDT is not maintained, then the most common issues faced will include difficulty in managing coordination and ultimately, the objectives will not be attained.
References
Books and Journals
- He, H., Yang, L., Peng, Y., Liu, L., Liu, L., Xue, Q. and Gao, S., 2021. The value of multidisciplinary team (MDT) management in the diagnosis and treatment of primary intrathoracic synovial sarcomas: a single-center experience. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13(2), p.600.
- Hibberson, M., Lawton, J. and Whitehead, D., 2021. Multidisciplinary simulation training for perioperative teams: An integrative review. Journal of Perioperative Nursing, 34(2), pp.3-13.
- Maharaj, A.D., Evans, S.M., Zalcberg, J.R., Ioannou, L.J., Graco, M., Croagh, D., Pilgrim, C.H., Dodson, T., Goldstein, D., Philip, J. and Kench, J.G., 2021. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. BMJ quality & safety, 30(10), pp.792-803.
- Mihailov, O.M., Mihailov, R., Ciprian, D.I.N.U. and Ciubara, A.B., 2024. The Importance of Involving a Multidisciplinary Team in the Management of a Patient Diagnosed with TB, Associating Erythema Nodosum. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 15(1), pp.193-207.
- Popat, S., Navani, N., Kerr, K.M., Smit, E.F., Batchelor, T.J., Van Schil, P., Senan, S. and McDonald, F., 2021. Navigating diagnostic and treatment decisions in non‐small cell lung cancer: expert commentary on the multidisciplinary team approach. The oncologist, 26(2), pp.e306-e315.
- Staudt, M.D., 2022. The multidisciplinary team in pain management. Neurosurgery Clinics, 33(3), pp.241-249.
- Willis, P., Lloyd, L., Hammond, J., Milne, A., Nelson-Becker, H., Perry, E., Ray, M., Richards, S. and Tanner, D., 2022. Casting light on the distinctive contribution of social work in multidisciplinary teams for older people. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(1), pp.480-497.
