Equity and Fixed-income Investment Case Study

Part 1

1) Identify and critically appraise how the rating agency makes connections between the overall debt level of the UK

Similar to other financial rating organizations, Fitch Ratings contributes significantly to the evaluation of credit risk for nations and businesses. Their approaches entail a thorough examination of possible hazards, institutional strength, and a variety of macroeconomic factors (Mikhaylov et al. 2019). Investors, legislators, and other stakeholders who depend on credit ratings to make decisions must comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of these evaluations.

Looking for top-notch assignment assistance? Get online assignment help from subject-specific writers who understand the intricacies of your course. Whether it's Nursing, Marketing, Java, or any other subject, our qualified professionals are here to ensure your assignments meet the highest standards.

Factors Considered by Fitch Rating Agency

• Overall Debt Level: A poor credit rating may result from high debt levels, particularly if they are maintained or increasing. The organization evaluates a nation's capacity to control and pay off its debt.
• External Debt: When analyzing a nation's external debt profile, Fitch looks at the foreign borrowings' arrangement, development, and denomination. A high reliance on foreign loans might lower than credit rating and make you more susceptible to shocks from the outside world.
• Inflation: Fitch evaluates the patterns of inflation because unstable and excessive inflation might jeopardize the economy's stability. This looks at how well the government can carry out monetary policy to keep inflation under control.
• Institutional Resistance: Strong and stable institutions are essential to the UK, and Fitch takes these factors into account when grading countries. Other factors it takes into account include political stability, institutional framework strength, and governance efficacy.
• Connection to Valuation Models: The dividend Discount Model is not relevant to sovereign credit ratings and is often used to value companies, not governments. Gordon Growth Model is better suited for stock valuation, much like DDM. Multi-stage Dividend Discount Model is mostly used to value businesses with variable dividend growth rates; less relevant for sovereign ratings (bloombergmedia.com, 2023). The Cash Flow Models more pertinent to business valuation, given sovereigns don't produce free cash flows in a comparable manner as corporations.
• Fitch's Approach: In its studies, Fitch Ratings usually offers a thorough analysis those points out both the company's advantages and disadvantages. Their methods may change over time in response to shifting financial markets and economic situations. They frequently combine quantitative and qualitative considerations.
• Other macroeconomic factors and the overall rating: Macroeconomic variables are crucial in determining a country's creditworthiness and have an impact on the credit ratings given by organizations like Fitch. A number of other macroeconomic parameters, in addition to the well-acknowledged elements like institutional resistance, inflation, and foreign debt, have a major impact on the evaluation of a nation's overall financial security and health (Afari, 2022).
• Trade balance and current account position: The trade surplus and current account situation are two important factors. Fitch evaluates a nation's capacity to maintain a positive trade balance. UK's creditworthiness may be impacted by protracted surpluses, which suggest insufficient local demand, or continuous deficits, which show an excessive reliance on imports.
• Foreign exchange reserves: A nation's foreign exchange reserves are an additional crucial factor to consider. The sufficiency of a country's reserves as a buffer against outside shocks is assessed by Fitch (Bisschop, 2018). While low reserves might make the nation more vulnerable, a strong reserve position gives the nation a cushion to weather difficult economic times.
• Unemployment rates: High unemployment rates that don't go down might have a negative impact on Fitch's credit rating since they raise questions about the economic and social well-being of the nation.

Figure 1: Net Debt

2) Critically appraise how the rating issued by the rating agency rephrases into the bond yields

This dynamic interplay affects bondholder returns and the cost of borrowing for firms and governments, which has important ramifications for issuers as well. This thorough analysis will explore the ways in which bond rates are influenced by credit ratings, the intricacies of this connection, and the wider ramifications for financial markets.

• Credit Ratings: Reputable rating companies like Moody's, Standard & Poor's (S&P), and Fitch Ratings offer credit ratings that offer an unbiased evaluation of the credit risk related to debt securities. These organizations evaluate issuers' financial standing, payment records, and general creditworthiness before assigning letter grades or numerical ratings (Gupta and Van Nieuwerburgh, 2021). Ratings generally indicate a higher chance of default and range from AAA for the greatest credit rating to D or C for the lowest.
• The Impact on Bond Yields: Credit rating functions as a stand-in for the projected default risk linked to a certain bond or issuer. Bonds with higher ratings are thought to be less hazardous, which lowers their expected maturity yields (Bessembinder et al. 2020). Bonds with lower ratings often fetch higher yields to draw in investors since they involve a larger default risk.
• Liquidity Dynamics: Bonds with high ratings often have higher market liquidity and draw in a wider range of investors. Bonds with lower ratings can have problems with liquidity, which would affect their rates. Because of greater demand, more liquidity for highly-rated bonds results in lower yields.
• Economic Conditions and External Factors: In times of economic uncertainty, lower-rated bond rates may increase as investors look for greater rewards to counteract perceived dangers. Bonds with higher ratings might have lower yields as they are viewed as safer investments in erratic times.
• Interest Rate Environment: All bond yields typically rise in an environment of rising interest rates, although lower-rated bonds can see more substantial changes.
• Critical Appraisal and Consideration: Investors rely heavily on credit ratings as signals to help them make judgments about expected returns and risk tolerance. Nevertheless, there are a number of difficulties and complexity with this relationship, such as the subjectivity of ratings by nature, their pro-cyclical character, and the significance of agency independence (Arjaliès and Bansal, 2018). For market players navigating the ever-changing world of fixed-income assets, ongoing examination and a perceptive approach to evaluating credit risks will continue to be essential.

Figure 2: Rating Agency Rephrases into the Bond Yields

Examination of recent bond yields of the UK with comparable ratings

Figure 3: Recent Bond Yield

The yields on one-, three-, and six-month terms range from 5.31% to 5.37%, which is a comparatively higher yield. Today's adjustments have been limited. As of right now, yields for the one-year duration are 4.92%, with minor adjustments. Yields steadily decline to 4.30% as the term is extended to 3 Years. With levels ranging from 4.13% to 4.20%, yields for the 4 to 7-year maturities continue to drop. There aren't many changes now either. Yields often show a negative trend as maturity increases. Longer-term bonds often have lower yields than short-term bonds; this is a frequent feature of the yield curve.

3) Critically assess who the investors in the country’s bonds are and what role the bonds play in their portfolios

In the historical setting of the United Kingdom, local and foreign investors participate in government bonds, sometimes referred to as gilts. A sizeable section of the shareholder base is made up of institutional investors including asset managers, insurance firms, and pension funds. In order to meet their long-term financial responsibilities, these corporations frequently look to government bonds for their stability and revenue (Tunggal, 2021). Individual investors also have an impact; these might be high-net-worth people or regular investors. Those looking for a safe refuge to preserve their wealth or generate income might be considered retail investors. UK bonds have a variety of roles in investors' portfolios. Gilts are a low-risk investment option for cautious investors as they provide a steady income stream and a buffer against market fluctuations.

Part 2

1) Critically analyze the difficulties in the valuation of private companies and the findings

Due to the lack of strict transparency regulations that publicly traded firms follow and the restricted availability of financial data, valuing private companies like ByteDance is a unique problem. In order to evaluate ByteDance's value for a possible 5% ownership stake purchase, an analyst must rigorously examine the intricacies associated with valuing private companies.

Lack of Transparency

• Challenge: Unlike public corporations, private companies are exempt from the requirement to report financial information. Due to its private ownership, ByteDance may not provide comprehensive economic data, which makes evaluating its actual financial condition difficult.
• Implication: The procedure for valuing a company is made more difficult by restricted access to cash flows, financial statements, and other essential data (Biloslavo et al. 2018). A flexible tool, the price to earning allows investors to assess market expectations, evaluate company valuations, and make well-informed investment choices.

Subjectivity in Financial Reporting

• Challenge: Financial reporting techniques may be more flexible for private businesses. The accuracy of valuation algorithms can be affected by subjectivity and volatility in the presentation of financial facts.
• Implication: Given the possibility of differences in accounting procedures that might skew the company's actual financial status, analysts should proceed with caution when depending just on reported financial data.

Private Equity

• Difficulty: Compared to publicly listed equities, private equity investments are less liquid. Since there isn't a publicly available market to set prices for private firm shares, it can be difficult to estimate their exact market worth.
• Implication: Understanding the illiquidity discount, which accounts for the difficulty of selling private shares relative to their public equivalents, is necessary to value ByteDance's equity stake.

Dependence on Comparable Transactions

• Challenge: Comparative deals within the sector are frequently the basis for valuation. Finding deals that are actually similar may be difficult, though, because different companies have different sizes, different development prospects, and different business structures (Nagy et al. 2018).
• Consequence: Reporting transactions more than one may need revisions by analysts, adding subjectivity and perhaps inaccurate information into the procedure for calculating valuations.

Limited Historical Performance

• Challenge: Privately owned companies frequently have short histories of operation, especially start-ups. Additionally, it becomes more risky to forecast future growth rates and cash flows when there is little previous evidence (Hay and Cordery, 2018).
• Implication: Since valuation models frequently rely on assumptions, changes in important factors may cause the analysis to become more sensitive, hence raising the risk level.

Unique Risk Profiles

• Challenge: Risks that are exclusive to private firms could be difficult to compare to those of their public equivalents. Concentrated risks may arise from a lack of a diverse stakeholder base.
• Consequence: Analysts need to perform a thorough risk analysis, taking into account aspects including the competitive environment, ByteDance-specific regulatory issues, and managerial caliber (Vicol et al. 2018).

Applying Findings to ByteDance

• Data Scrutiny: ByteDance is a privately held corporation; analysts need to carefully examine the financial data that is accessible. When available, relying on inspected reports and evaluating the consistency and dependability of data is essential.
• Adjusting for Subjectivity: Analysts may modify published numbers to reflect a more cautious assessment of ByteDance's financial success since they are aware of the subjectivity that may exist in the financial information provided by the business.
• Customizing Comparable Transactions: Investigators may need to take into account ByteDance's distinct company strategy, geographic reach, and development trajectory when choosing and customizing similar transactions. To take into consideration the variations between the ByteDance and the chosen comparables, adjustments must be performed.

2) Evaluate the political risks of this investment in light of the recent clampdown

There are considerable political risks associated with investing in Chinese IT businesses, such as ByteDance, especially in light of the current regulatory crackdown enforced by Chinese authorities. The Chinese government continues to exert more control over the IT industry, claiming worries about conformity to regulations, data security, and competitive problems. Investors in ByteDance need to carefully assess the difficulties and risks brought on by this regulatory landscape.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Compliance

• Challenge: To guarantee compliance with several rules, including safeguarding information and user privacy, and competitive measures, Chinese authorities have increased regulatory control on internet enterprises?
• Consequence: ByteDance, a significant participant in the IT sector, may be subject to heightened scrutiny and regulatory scrutiny for failing to follow these changing guidelines. If it doesn't comply, it can face fines or have its activities restricted.

Data Security Concerns

• Challenge: The Chinese government has taken steps to protect sensitive data since it is especially concerned about data security.
• Consequence: ByteDance could have to deal with strict laws to solve data security issues because their products frequently include large-scale data harvesting. Infrastructure and technological expenditures may be necessary to ensure compliance (Zaccone, and Pedrini, 2020).

Antitrust Measures

• Challenge: Companies with dominating market positions are the focus of Chinese authorities' aggressive antitrust enforcement efforts in the tech industry.
• Implication: ByteDance may be the target of antitrust probes due to its significant market position in sectors like as social media, as well as content production platforms. Penalties, requests for restructuring, or restrictions on commercial practices are examples of possible outcomes.

Government Intervention in Business Operations

Challenge: The government has shown that it is prepared to actively interfere in IT businesses' operations in order to bring them into line with the interests and aims of the country.
Government involvement might have an impact on ByteDance's economic strategy, content control policies, and expansion ambitions. The company's strategic choices for the long term are made with uncertainty when this degree of involvement is used.

Geopolitical Anticipations

• Challenge: Chinese IT enterprises may be impacted by geopolitical conflicts, especially those that arise between China and other nations. Tensions in diplomacy and trade conflicts might impact the regulatory landscape.
• Implication: Geopolitical variables may have an impact on ByteDance's worldwide activities, particularly its participation in foreign markets. The capacity to conduct business in some areas may be impacted by changes in political relationships (Luthra and Mangla, 2018).

Reputation and User Trust

• Challenge: The reputation of digital businesses may be impacted by increased scrutiny from regulators and unfavourable press.
• Implication: ByteDance may struggle to retain user confidence and appeal to a global audience, similar to previous Chinese IT behemoths. User engagement and acquisitions may be impacted by a damaged reputation.

Evolving Regulatory Landscape

• Challenge: It is difficult for businesses to anticipate and adjust to changes in China's constantly changing regulatory landscape.
• Implication: In order to successfully negotiate the constantly shifting regulatory environment, ByteDance needs to be flexible and agile. This flexibility becomes essential to maintaining business operations and expansion.

Government Influence on Content

• Challenge: The Chinese government has put in place procedures to limit the flow of information and has considerable influence over internet material.
• Implication: ByteDance, the owner of websites similar to TikTok, would encounter pressure to abide by laws governing content control. It is a difficult job to strike a balance between these demands and the requirements of a worldwide user base.

Mitigation Strategies

ByteDance might contemplate broadening its operational scope and service offerings to mitigate reliance on one product or market. By proactively investing in strong compliance systems, the business can guarantee conformity to changing legislation and establish a reputation for being a conscientious corporate citizen. ByteDance might possibly reduce regulatory risks by understanding and addressing issues through open and honest cooperation with regulatory bodies.

Part 3

1) Colvin Ltd’s WACC

Calculation of WACC
E is the market value of equity	86,40,00,000
V is the total market value of equity and debt	1,44,00,00,000
Re is the required return on equity	0.10
D is the market value of debt	57,60,00,000
Rd is the required return on debt	0.08
Tc is the corporate tax rate	0.25
WACC	0.084

Table 1: Calculation of WACC

The rate of return that investment investors anticipate is known as the required return on equity (Belo et al. 2019). Usually, the CAPM estimates it. A financial statistic called Price-to-Book Value contrasts the market price per share of a business with its book value per share. Moreover, it is 10% in this instance, or 0.10. Essential Debt Return Debt holders anticipate earning this rate of return. It is the expense of debt for the business. It is 8% in this instance, or 0.08. The amount of revenue generated by a business that it must pay in taxes is known as its corporate tax rate. That's 25% in this instance, or 0.25.

2) The company’s latest FCFF

FCFF (Free Cash Flow to the Firm)
Net Income	12,67,20,000
Non-cash Charges	7,20,00,000
Investment in Fixed Capital	8,04,00,000
Investment in Working Capital	2,28,00,000
Net Borrowing	2,88,00,000
FCFF	12,43,20,000

Table 2: Calculation of FCFF

For valuation models like the discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, FCFF is an essential statistic. A company's intrinsic worth may be calculated by discounting its projected cash flows in the future to their present value (Dewi et al. 2019). In this instance, a positive FCFF suggests that the business has made more money than it needed for operations and investments, opening the door to potential debt payback, dividend payments, or more growth investments.

3) Present Value of Firm and Equity

PV of the Firm and Equity
FCFF	12,43,20,000
Stable Growth rate of FCFF	0.03
WACC	8.40%
Market Value of Debt	576000000
Present Value of Firm	2371288889
Present Value of Equity (PV Firm − Market Value of Debt)	1795288889

Table 3: Calculation of PV of Firm and Equity

Taking into account the cost of capital and future free cash flows, this is the projected current worth of the entire company. That comes to about $23.71 billion in this instance. This figure must be maintained for determining the company's total value. This is an estimate of the equity part of the company's current valuation. It is calculated by deducting the average market value of the debt from the company's current worth. That comes to almost $17.95 billion in this instance. This figure is essential for determining the value of the company's equity held by its shareholders.

4) Calculation of the Company’s latest FCFE

FCFE (Free Cash Flow to Equity)
Net Income	12,67,20,000
Net Borrowing	2,88,00,000
Investment in Fixed Capital	8,04,00,000
FCFE	4,63,20,000

Table 4: Calculation of FCFE

$4,632,000,000,000 is Colvin Ltd.'s computed Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE). This is the amount of money that the firm has available to pay out to its equity investors, which includes its shareholders, as well as for any other uses like dividends, share buybacks, or business reinvestment. An investor's tool of choice is the price-to-sales ratio, particularly in industries or sectors where firms may not have steady profits.

5) Present Value of the Equity Using FCFE

Calculation of Present Value of Equity Using FCFE
FCFE	4,63,20,000
Stable Growth rate of FCFF	0.04
Required Return On Equity	0.10
Present Value of Equity Using FCFE	802880000

Table 5: Calculation of Present Value of Equity

As it indicates the inherent worth of the company's stock, this indicator is critical to analysts and investors. After deducting the necessary return on equity and the anticipated growth rate, it represents the prospective value that equity investors may anticipate obtaining from future cash flows. This figure is frequently used in valuation procedures to evaluate how desirable it is to invest in the company's shares.

Reference list

Afari, K.B., 2022. The role on fixed income in pension scheme investment in Ghana: A possible adoption for the United States economy. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 13(14), pp.27-39.

Arjaliès, D.L. and Bansal, P., 2018. Beyond numbers: How investment managers accommodate societal issues in financial decisions. Organization Studies, 39(5-6), pp.691-719.

Belo, F., Lin, X. and Yang, F., 2019. External equity financing shocks, financial flows, and asset prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(9), pp.3500-3543.

Bessembinder, H., Spatt, C. and Venkataraman, K., 2020. A survey of the microstructure of fixed-income markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(1), pp.1-45.

Biloslavo, R., Bagnoli, C. and Edgar, D., 2018. An eco-critical perspective on business models: The value triangle as an approach to closing the sustainability gap. Journal of cleaner production, 174, pp.746-762.

bloombergmedia.com, 2023, Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.bloombergmedia.com/press/economic-forum-powered-by-bloomberg-to-return-in-may-2024/ [Accessed on: 25th November, 2023]

Dewi, I.A.M.C., Sari, M.M.R., Budiasih, I.G.A.N. and Suprasto, H.B., 2019. Free cash flow effect towards firm value. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 6(3), pp.108-116.

Duijm, P. and Steins Bisschop, S., 2018. Short-termism of long-term investors? The investment behaviour of Dutch insurance companies and pension funds. Applied Economics, 50(31), pp.3376-3387.

Gupta, A. and Van Nieuwerburgh, S., 2021. Valuing private equity investments strip by strip. The Journal of Finance, 76(6), pp.3255-3307.

Hay, D. and Cordery, C., 2018. The value of public sector audit: Literature and history. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40(1), pp.1-15.

Luthra, S. and Mangla, S.K., 2018. Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, pp.168-179.

markets.ft.com, 2023. Market Bonds. Available at: https://markets.ft.com/data/bonds [Accessed on: 25th November, 2023]

Mikhaylov, A., Sokolinskaya, N. and Lopatin, E., 2019. Asset allocation in equity, fixed-income and cryptocurrency on the base of individual risk sentiment. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 16(2), p.171.

Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D. and Popp, J., 2018. The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain—the case of Hungary. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3491.

Tunggal, N.Z., 2021. Impact Of Covid-19 Pandemic on Fixed Income Unit Trust Fund and Equity Unit Trust Fund Performances: A Comparative Analysis in Malaysia. Labuan Bulletin of International Business and Finance (LBIBF), 19(1), pp.85-99.

Vicol, M., Neilson, J., Hartatri, D.F.S. and Cooper, P., 2018. Upgrading for whom? Relationship coffee, value chain interventions and rural development in Indonesia. World Development, 110, pp.26-37.

Zaccone, M.C. and Pedrini, M., 2020. ESG factor integration into private equity. Sustainability, 12(14), p.5725.