- Task 1
- a) A description of the responsibilities of an organization, concerning food hygiene.
- b) An analysis of the benefits of good hygiene and the hazards of poor hygiene.
- Task 2:
- a) A description of key food types that are subject to food safety standards
- b) A discussion on the nature of contamination hazards
- c) A discussion on sources of contamination
- d) A discussion on the reasons for strict controls on food safety
- Task 3
- a) Detection of Contamination Processes
- b) Organisational and Site Control Measures
- c) Analysis of Food-Related Control Measures
Task 1
a) A description of the responsibilities of an organization, concerning food hygiene.
In this competitive and dynamic food industry landscape maintaining impeccable hygiene standards significance cannot be overlooked. As a franchise functioning within a large corporation, it is essential to comprehend the responsibility that the corporation maintains to ensure food hygiene (Sharman, Wallace and Jespersen, 2020). This breakdown illustrated these responsibilities highlighting the essential role they play in maintaining the reputation and success of individual establishments.
- Regulation compliances: At the centre of the corporation, the responsibility is to maintain the commitment toward maintaining compliance with regulations in respect of food standards and safety. Regarding international and local levels, strict regulation Adherence is essential and not negotiable. This regulation covers every aspect of food preparation, general hygiene level and storage (Olaimat et al., 2020). For instance “Regulation No 852/2004” stated that the hygiene regulation and guidelines for staff supplying an extensive framework need to be significantly obeyed. This regulation violation holds legal consequences and jeopardizes customer health and safety (Legislation, 2023). Non-maintenance of this regulation can pose a threat to clients and also have legal repercussions for franchise networks.
- Staff awareness and training: Maintaining staff members' awareness and competence incorporated within food handling is the major responsibility of the organization. The corporation needed to maintain its task of supplying a thorough activity program that incorporated both continuous learning and initial induction for enhancing staff awareness about food safety (Foodsafetyhelpline, 2014). The training needs to cover all topic spectrums including appropriate food handling methods, current corporation standards, any changes in the Food Safety Act and hygiene protocol. By regulation compliance such as “regulation number 852/2004, the food safety training guidelines developed by Improve Ltd in 2008, and food hygiene regulation 2006” the corporation can effectively determine its industry standard by developing the foundation for exceptional knowledge and adaptive workforce that acknowledges high hygiene level maintenance (FAO, 2023).
- Communication establishment and maintaining its standard: Developing realistic and clear standards of hygiene for staff is essential for ensuring consistency around the franchise network. This standard needs to underscore multiple food storage, handling and preparation aspects. Efficient communication about this food safety standard in all franchises is essential to help maintain clarity and transparency while developing a comprehension of their responsibility and role in maintaining hygiene (McFarland et al., 2019). The regulated framework alignment with corporation standards allows the corporation to evolve as a guiding franchise beacon.
- Resource allocation: The corporation is responsible for supplying the necessary resources to maintain hygiene standards within the franchise. This includes maintaining that individual fantasy has effective access to the required equipment, training material and cleaning resources (Park et al., 2018). Sufficient resource allocation is logistical essential and demonstrates the company's strategic investment that helps to maintain client trust and corporation integrity.
- Evaluation and monitoring: Continuous evaluation and monetary employment in individual franchises can help to adhere to the hygiene level which is another corporation's responsibility part. This incorporates cleanliness assessment daily routine prevailing regulation compliances and staff practices (Okpala and Korzeniowska, 2021). Observation mechanisms connected with company legislative requirements demonstrate a proactive approach to rectifying and addressing any significant deviation.
- Incident response: Hygiene-relevant matters can create challenges for corporations therefore the corporation needs to adopt robust protocols that effectively provide prompt responses towards unfortunate events. This includes functioning a collective action implementation, communication strategy formulation and thorough investigation. Transparent and scheduled responsibility is essential in eliminating all reputational hindrances from unfortunate incidents and ensuring client trust (Elkington, 2020).
The above responsibilities demonstrate company maintenance towards legal compliance while contributing effectively to the individual franchises' overarching success. This regulatory framework's alignment with legal standards and liberating significant communication monitoring mechanisms and resource allocation help to develop a phase for establishing networks that excel and prioritize food hygiene (Raj and Singh, 2021). Those help maintain brand reputation and establish the company's long-term success within this competitive food market.
b) An analysis of the benefits of good hygiene and the hazards of poor hygiene.
- Good hygiene benefits: Ensuring hygiene standards within hospitality or catering corporations poses multiple advantages ranging from maintaining client health and safety to increasing corporation reputation and efficiency (Prüss-Ustün et al., 2019).
- Customer satisfaction and safety: Adequate Chin approaches as demonstrated by corporations such as “food and agriculture organization and the Swiss International Hotel '' is crucial in maintaining that the served food poses safety and high standards for intake. The adequate food standard adheres to “Hazard analysis and critical control system (HACCP) and good hygiene practices (GHPs)” Asus the corporation to safeguard contamination minimizing foodborne disease or illness reduction (Britishsoftdrinks, 2023). Intern this helps to maintain client satisfaction and safety as supporters rightly anticipate food that achieves strict hygiene standards.
- Regulation compliances: Maintaining developed hygiene standards helps to prevent client safety and ensure international and local regulation complaints. Corporations need to follow regulation number 852/2004 which illustrates franchise promises to ethical and legal standards within the food aspect (Legislation, 2023). These are valuable to maintain business legal consequences and increase corporation credibility among clients.
- Company product activity and operational efficiency: Adequate hygiene approaches can have a high contribution to scattering enterprise efficiency. “Standard operation procedure (SOPs) for food safety and hygiene” is a suitable example incorporated by Swiss International Hotel supplies a holistic initiative to maintain food standards from shopping to service (Foodsafetyhelpline, 2023). This structure initiative in improving corporation work efficiency minimizes human error and promotes corporation supply chain management.
- Food waste prevention: Appropriate food hygiene initiative goes beyond food shelf life minimizing wastage and spoilage reduction. Effective monitoring, storage and handling as demonstrated within SOP minimizes contamination risk and maintains food safety for people within an extended time limit (Inspection, 2019). Inter this is available in maintaining sustainability and cost management by reducing unnecessary wastage of food.
- Poor hygiene hazard: On the other hand, inadequate hygiene initiatives can lead people toward hazard drain compromising client holds and damaging the Company image by exposing legal risk.
- Foodborne illness: The significant severe and immediate poor hygiene hazard the challenge for the food corporation is foodborne illness. Food contamination due to inadequate food storage, handling and lack of personal hygiene of the staff can hold harmful bacteria that can increase illness that is harmful to the client and generate legal consequences for the corporation against the establishment (Berge and Baars, 2020).
- Legal Standard and Consequences: Food safety regulation noncompliance can possess legal ramifications in cooperating establishment closure, brand reputation damage and fines. Regulatory bodies such as the Food Standard Agency can proactively rate and assess the hygiene standards making it essential for the corporation to ensure compliance at a high level (Chen et al., 2020).
- Customer loyalty disturbance: Inadequate Food hygiene can lead to customer dissatisfaction that generates client loyalty loss. Food in rating scheme introduction by local authorities supplies clients with significant information access about hygiene standard establishment (Shaw, 2018). The low ratings of food hygiene can deter valuable customers and damage the corporation's reputation.
- Negative publicity and operational disruption: Inadequate or poor hygiene can lead to negative publicity by disrupting corporation functions that include an immediate collective investigation and action for sanitation and cleaning to maintain hygiene (Foodsafetyhelpline, 2014). Client bed ratings or complaints against poor hygiene standards can lead to negative publicity for the corporation.
Overall good hygiene advantages extend beyond company regulatory compliance to maintain client safety reputation and operational efficiency while poor hygiene can destroy client loyalty efficiency and generate legal consequences (Chen et al., 2020). Effective management of hygiene standards helps to eliminate the legal obligation to provide sustainability.
Task 2:
a) A description of key food types that are subject to food safety standards
Within the food industry acknowledging food types and their safety standard is essential to maintain client health and well-being (Ma et al., 2019). This manual focus is on supplying franchise with information about fundamental key types with their required safety standard and risk level.
- Low-risk foods: Low-risk foods are less reactive to human health and cannot cause food poisoning. Franchises need to familiarise themselves with such types of low-risk food categories (Bouzembrak et al., 2019). Those are as follows
- Preserved food: Processed food that is generated from food preservation methods such as salted fees and smoked fish goes beyond their shelf life (Inspection, 2019).
- Ambient storage food: This food is illustrated as food that can be stored at room temperature, such as cake, bread, crisp serial and biscuits (Swissinternationalhotels, 2022).
- Dry foods: This food type illustrates that food that contains minimum moisture such as flour, bread, and biscuit.
- Acidic food: This type of food has a minimum pH level such as marmalades, and chocolate jam. This type of acidic food awareness is crucial to maintain health issues (Livestrong, 2019).
- Fermented product: This type of food is preserved through microbiological action such as pepperoni and salami (Olaimat et al., 2020).
- Unopened canned goods: This type of food maintains safety before opening.
- Fat content or high-sugar food: Food such as marmalades and chocolate jam has a high content of fat or sugar.
This type of food has low risk however this also needs to be identified for its appropriate storage and proper handling while adhering to guidelines, especially for canned food (Warwick, 2022).
- Food safety system: Franchise our motivation to food has in regulation 2006 compliance with food safety system implementation that is a significant online resource facilitating all legal compliance. This system incorporated a six-stage procedure.
- Developing an action plan for the food safety system with key personnel and sites
- Demonstrating the system scope by fragmenting its operation within a simple block
- Addressing hazards and risks associated with the continuous food handling process
- Formulated procedure and rule that maintain safety operation
- Develop report through monitoring of the procedure
- The system extended to address unforeseen challenges
- Low-risk food manufacturing process: Franchisees incorporate multiple preparation actions for low-risk foods such as jam-making chocolate production packaging food selling, infusing alcohol and home-baked that does not need any temperature control (Swissinternationalhotels, 2022). It is essential to line up these actions with safety regulations.
- High-risk food: Acknowledging high-risk food is essential to safeguard against food-borne illness.
These foods include
- Dairy products such as cream, custard and milk
- Shellfish and seafood such as cooked prawns, mussels
- Farinaceous dishes such as couscous, pasta and cooked rice
- Uncooked poultry or meat (WHO, 2018)
- The high-risk food preparation action: Franchises need to care about their action such as developing ready-to-eat or raw meat food, baby food homemade ice cream undercooked raw food. This can increase allergy and destroy individuals' safety (Singleton, 2023).
This manual offers effective foundation guidelines for overall franchises highlighting food safety standard implementation understanding and significance.
b) A discussion on the nature of contamination hazards
Microorganisms such as viruses, staphylococcus aureus, TB, clostridium perfringens, salmonella and E- coli concentrate toxins within the food and can cause vomiting. On the other hand clostridiumperfringens, campylobacter je juni, Escherichia coli and Salmonella can originate in the gut and enhance the risk of diarrhoea which poses a slower onset. Food bacterial contamination occurred during certain equipment touches.
On the other hand, Contamination hazards in aspects of food safety incorporate multiple types and sources including physical, chemical and microbial contaminants. Acknowledging this hazard is essential for ensuring food safety standards while maintaining adverse consequences such as injury, food poisoning, foodborne illness and food wastage or spoilage.
Microbial contamination
Microbial contamination is bacterial viral and mycotoxin contamination.
Bacterial contamination
This contamination can be generated from raw milk, shellfish, contaminated water, raw vegetables and animals. The bacteria include Staphylococcus aureus, listeria and e coli. This bacterium has been transmitted during the handling, processing and slaughtering of food. Bacteria cannot get to the food by it on that use channels such as surface equipment containers hands and knives. The bacterial cause contamination is referred to as the description of harmful pathogenic microorganisms transfer from one surface to another and then to food. This can be classified into two types such as direct cross-contamination and indirect cross-contamination.
Direct contamination is demonstrated as the contamination that occurs during direct contact with food and bacteria-containing sources. For intense raw meat intake, a touch or sneeze of overcooked food can generate this type of contamination.
On the other hand, direct contamination occurs during the transfer of bacteria via a vehicle. Intense case-cutting knife utilization for both raw meat and cooked meat without appropriate cleaning can generate this type of contamination (Food Standards Agency, 2016). Therefore appropriate cooking, pasteurization, water treatment and hygiene can help to prevent this type of contamination.
Viral contamination
This type of contamination is generated by the virus hepatitis
A through infected people, undercooked food or rough food contaminated water. It can be maintained through proper sanitization, cooking and hygiene (Barone et al., 2020).
Mycotoxin contamination
This contamination is generated from aflatoxins that can be found in peanuts. After taking raw food items it can be originated. To eliminate this contamination proper inspection with proper storage is required (Akhtar et al., 2021).
Physical contamination
There are two types foreign objective and pest contamination.
Foreign objects such as paste hair, plastic, metal and glass can generate physical contamination. On the other hand paste contamination can be generated by insects, birds and rodents. Appropriate sanitization, food storage and pest control can help prevent this type of contamination (Zamora-Ledezma et al., 2021).
Chemical contamination
This types generate from, pesticide residue, cleaning chemicals, food additives and environmental containments (Yu et al., 2019).
The pesticide residue sources are inappropriate washed production, soil and contaminated water. This can be eliminated through proper washing. The food additive sources are excessive utilization within food processing. Regulatory-appropriate labelling and limits can prevent this type of contamination (GOV.UK, 2015). The cleaning chemicals can be generated from inappropriate cleaning initiatives that can be eliminated through maintaining cleaning protocol while pollutants and heavy metals can generate environmental contamination that can be prevented through raw material monitoring and control with maintenance safety standards.
This type of contamination can lead to foodborne disease and food poisoning.
c) A discussion on sources of contamination
Food contamination can occur from multiple sources enhancing the risk of health issues and recording vigilance to maintain integrity and safety within the food supply chain. Acknowledging this source is essential for effective control and prevention initiative implementation (Palansooriya et al., 2019).
Figure 1: sources of contamination
- Raw food: Raw food items such as vegetables, meat and fruit can porterage multiple pathogens such as virus moulds and bacteria from the circumstances and harvesting and growing procedure duration. Washing vegetables and fruit with appropriate meat cooking can eliminate this type of risk (Food Standards Agency, 2016). Additionally harvesting and cultivation time hygiene practices adherence can also minimize the risk.
- Dart and wastage: Insufficient unclean workspace or waste management can lead to hazards of contamination by coming in contact with decaying matter, dirt or waste (WHO, 2018). Clean-as-you-go initiative adaptation with proper Waste disposal and regular work area cleaning can help to eliminate cross-contamination risk.
- People: Inadequate hygiene among individuals involved in improper handling of the food can enhance contaminates such as viruses bacteria foreign objects and jewellery within food. Personal hygiene initiatives and strict adherence including proper handling methods protective clothing during cooking and hand washing can eliminate this type of risk (Barone et al., 2020).
- Pests: Birds, insects, and rodents can generate physical contamination pathogens or bacteria via food item contact. Pest control initiative implementation with proper maintenance and inspection can help to develop clean circumstances to eliminate pest contamination (Abebe, Gugsa and Ahmed, 2020).
- Chemicals: Chemical contaminants including cleaning chemical additives and pesticides can be included within the food supply chain during processing, cleaning and growth (Lebelo et al., 2021). Recommended pesticide cleaning procedure uses with compliance adherence can minimise this type of contamination.
- Environment contaminant: Pollutants such as industrial chemical pesticides and heavy metals can enter with human body via soil water and air. Proper raw material monitoring and environmental regulation adherence can eliminate this risk.
Overall food supply chain safeguarding incorporates multifaceted initiatives to identify contamination from different sources. Trigorous practices in the aspect of hygiene with regular safety standard compliance maintenance and infection are crucial for effective prevention (Mishra, Kumar and Dubey, 2021). The food corporation Incorporated multiple awareness campaigns Technology advancement and research on their food have an essential role in increasing the capability to mitigate and address contaminant risk while safeguarding the continued food quality and safety that people consume.
d) A discussion on the reasons for strict controls on food safety
Strict maintenance of food safety standards is essential to ensure individuals will be in health and safeguard against foodborne illness and food poisoning occurrence. Multiple reasons highlight the requirement for vigilant oversight and strict regulation in the food safety dynamic (Ehuwa, Jaiswal and Jaiswal, 2021).
Figure 2: The reasons for strict controls on food safety
- Public health maintenance: The foremost prison to maintain food safety standards is public health safeguarding. Unsafe food or contaminated food can lead to illness from mild diseases such as gastrointestinal discomfort to life-threatening or severe conditions (Sarkar et al., 2021). The design regulations help reduce poor food-associated consumer health risks.
- Foodborne disease prevention: Strict control of food-borne disease occurrence through eliminating unsafe food consumption is valuable. Chemical viral and bacterial contaminants within food can generate less that can affect a large customer base (Todd, 2020). Mandate measurement of regulation can help to address eliminate and control such types of contamination from the food supply chain.
- Consumer loyalty: Food safety regulation maintenance can increase customer loyalty toward food corporations. When a client notices the corporation's food safety maintenance and cleanliness they provide a high rating that is helpful to maintain the industry image (Faour-Klingbeil and C. D. Todd, 2019).
- Economic influence: Outbreaks of food burner disease can occur with effective economic repercussions. The medical treatment associated cost and band reputation damage can be substantial. Stringent control to eliminate this type of economic influence can help prevent contamination matters.
- Legal compliances: The Food Safety Modernisation Act was developed to provide guidelines and legal advice for the food industry. Strict maintenance and compliance with this regulation are essential to maintain the legal consequences of the company.
- Recall and traceability protocol: Regulation maintains traceability measures that permit authority to promptly identify contamination sources in food safety concern incidents. Transparent recall regulation or protocol is essential for eliminating concept food products from the food market quickly.
- Continuous improvement: Regulatory frameworks boost food safety practices' continuous improvement, for food corporations need to be up to date about the regulations including advancements within scientific understanding of industry adequate practices and technology that are helpful to maintain evolving standards to identify emerging risks that are associated with food contamination (Britishsoftdrinks, 2023).
Robust and holistic food safety guidelines and regulation implementation such as FSMA are essential to safeguard public health by gaining the loyalty of the customer and facilitating international trade. Continuous improvement in regulation practices compliance and prevention highlights the company's commitment to developing a reliable and safe food supply chain within the corporation (Elkington, 2020).
Task 3
a) Detection of Contamination Processes
Contamination has posed significant risks in terms of the safety and quality of food products. The detection of contamination is considered a crucial aspect in terms of ensuring that the food is safe for consumption. There are different processes and technologies are employed for identifying and tracing the contaminants throughout the food supply chain management.
One of the primary methods for the detection of contamination is with the help of regular and systematic testing measures (Undas et al. 2023). The food testing is included with the Analysis of the samples in order to identify the presence of contaminants such as the bacteria viruses, parasites, chemicals and physical hazards. The microbiological testing in terms for instance is essential for identifying harmful microorganisms like Salmonella, E.coli and Listeria as these tests can be conducted at different stages of the food production process from raw materials to the finished product.
In addition to the microbiological testing, the chemical analysis is employed for the detection of contaminants that are integrated with pesticides and relatives preservatives and the heavy metals (Liyakat et al. 2022). The advanced technology searches for chromatography and the spectrometry can play a pivotal role in order to identifying and quantifying the chemical contaminants. This can be helpful in ensuring complaints with the regulatory limits and standards.
Furthermore, the molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction are used for the specific identification of genetic materials by enabling the detection of even place amounts of the pathogens. This is particularly considered as important in the cases where the conventional methods cannot be addressed as sensitive enough.
Apart from routine testing, the monitoring of the entire food production process is essential as it involves the implementation of hazard analysis critical control point systems. The hazard analysis critical control point system is a preventive approach that can identify and address the potential as ours at the critical point in order to conduct the production process (Ulhas Sopanrao Kadam and Jong Chan Hong, 2022). With the focus on key control points, the system can help them in preventing, eliminating and reducing the risk of contamination.
The advanced technologies such as sensors and the data analytics are increasingly being integrated into the detection process where the technologies allow for real-time monitoring of different parameters that are including with the temperature, humidity and chemical composition (Nan, Xue and Bi, 2022). Any of the deviations from established gnomes can trigger the alarm by enabling rapid response to potential contamination events.
Responsibility is considered as another crucial aspect of contamination detection with the implementation of traceability systems. There can be tracking of the movement of raw materials and finished products throughout the supply chain practices (Qiu et al. 2022). In the event of contamination, traceability can allow for swift identification and removal of affected products from the market by reducing the risk of widespread harm.
The collaboration along with the information sharing aspects within the regulatory instances can be used to enhance the effectiveness of the process of detecting the contamination (Cornet and Baurain, 2022). There is a need to address regular communication in order to ensure some aspects that are shared in terms of the emerging threats along with the sharing of best practices for contributing to the resilient food safety systems.
Concluding with the study, it can be said that the detection of the contaminants in the food industry can be improved with the help of multifaceted approach in terms of the incorporation of regular testing instances along with monitoring the advanced technological advancements and the traceability systems. Thgis process can be helpoful in mitigating the risks that are libnked with different contaminants with ensuring safeguarding aspects of the food supply chain and protection of the health requirements of the consumers.
Lastly, the advancements in the detection methods addressed from the routine testing aspects towards the integration of cutting-edge technological instances are addressing the potential to determine the commitment in order to ensure food safety measures. Apart from this, the proactive implementation of the recipient systems along with the information collaboratively strengthens the resilience of the food safety framework (Feng et al. 2023). This can further help in protecting the integrity of supply and management along with the health of the consumers.
b) Organisational and Site Control Measures
In order to ensure food safety there is a requirement for the implementation of rigorous organisational and site control measures. These measures are designed to prevent minimise or eliminate the contamination risks at different stages of the food production processes.
The organisational control measures are included with the establishment of a strong food safety culture within the company (Shabani, Jerie and Shabani, 2023). These measures start with a clear leadership commitment towards food safety principles where the management should prioritise and communicate the importance of adhering to food safety standards and regulations addressed by the organisation. This commitment has the ability to penetrate through all the levels of the organisation by enhancing a sense of responsibility among the employees.
Employee training is considered a fundamental aspect of organisational control, where all the staff members are involved in food production with adequate training or hygiene practices along with sanitization procedures and the importance of following the established protocols (Wijethilake, Upadhaya and Lama, 2021). The regular training sessions and the refresher courses can be helpful. In reinforcing these principles by ensuring that the employees are remaining vigilant and compliant.
In addition to training, the implementation of a comprehensive sanitization programme is essential as this is included with the regular cleansing of equipment along with facilities and services to prevent the buildup of contaminants (Li et al. 2023). The sanitizing agents along with the procedures, can be carefully chosen for effectiveness against the specific contaminants that are relevant to food production processes.
In order to enhance the control measures, the organisations often implement quality management systems that are included with ISO 22000 (He and Ismail, 2023). The QSM can provide a framework for the management of food safety by incorporating the hazard analysis risk assessment and continuous improvement processes. The compliance with international standards can demonstrate a commitment towards food safety and facilitate trade practices by ensuring products in order to meet global regulatory requirements.
Site control measures are focusing on the physical aspects of the food production environment that can be included with the design and layout of facilities in order to minimise the risk of cross-contamination (Tan et al. 2021). The physical barriers that are intruded with separate processing areas for the raw and cooked products can be helpful in preventing the unintended transfer of the contaminants.
Accessing control can be considered as another critical site control measure where the limited access to production areas in terms of authorised personnel can be helpful in reducing the risk of contamination from the external sources (Dodd, Guthrie and Dumay, 2022). This can be included with the use of security entry points, an employee identification system and monitoring of all the visitor's activities.
Equipment design and maintenance can also contribute to site control where the machinery and utensils are required to be made from materials that are easy to clean and resistant to corrosion (Etminan et al. 2022). The monitoring of the environment is depicted as the integral part of the site control measures in terms of regular checking for the factors that are included with the air quality, water quality and pest control can be helpful in maintaining a hygienic production environment (Snowdon et al. 2023). In addition, the results of monitoring can be analysed along with corrective actions that are required to be implemented for addressing the deviations from he established standards.
It can be said that the integration of the comprehensive organizational measures along with site control measures can be helpful in considering the imperative aspects in terms of upholding the food safety standards. In this regard, a holistic approach can be encompassed with the help of strong leadership commitment along with continuous training of the employees. This can be helpful in adhering to the quality management system and vigilant site control practices (Fischer et al. 2022). As a result, there can be minimization of the risks in the contamination process by ensuring that the production of the products is safe and having quality assurance.
c) Analysis of Food-Related Control Measures
The control measures that are related with the food aspects are having the potential to encompass a wide range of practices and technologies. This can further address the aim of ensuring the safety along with the quality of the food items. These measures are required to be designed with the motive to address the specific risks for different types of contaminants along with the production processes and supply chain dynamics.
- Raw Material Sourcing and Approval: The implementation of rigorous supplier approval along with the monitoring processes is essential as this is included with the assessing of the safety and quality of raw materials before they have entered the production process. The establishing partnerships with the trusted suppliers and regulatory auditing of the facilities can be helpful in ensuring the integrity of supply chain management.
- Allergen Management: The allergen control measures are essential with the consideration of an increasing prevalence of food allergies. In this regard, there is a requirement for clear labelling aspects with the segregation of allergenic ingredients and stringent clinging procedures that are essential for preventing the cross-contact during the production.
- Temperature Control: The temperature control measures are particularly important for the prevention of the growth of harmful microorganisms where the cold chain management is essential for perishable products, while the proper cooking temperatures are required for eliminating the pathogens in cooked foods.
- Packaging and Storage: Proper packaging and storage practices can be also helpful in contributing significantly to the food safety measures. The packaging materials can be suitable for the intended use with the prevention of the contaminants from external sources. Adequate storage conditions along with the temperature and humidity control can be helpful in maintaining the quality of the product.
- Hygienic Processing: The hygiene processing is included with the implementation of good manufacturing practices in order to maintain a clean and sanitary production environment. This can be included with proper hand hygiene equipment sanitization, along with the use of protective clothing in order to prevent microbial and physical contamination aspects.
- Water and Air Quality Control: There is a need to ensure the quality of water that is used in the food production process as it is the determination of the source of contamination. The regular testing and treatment of water sources are required similar to the air quality control in order to minimise the risk of airborne contaminants in the production area.
- Pest Control: There is a need to implement effective pest control measures that are required for preventing contamination of the insects, rodents and other pests. In this regard, regular inspection along with the use of traps and proper waste management can be helpful in contributing to a pest-free environment.
- Recall and Traceability Systems: If contamination has been detected, there is a requirement for rapid response in order to minimise the impact on consumers and the brand. The recalling system, along with the integration of robust responsibility mechanisms can be helpful in allowing for the swift identification of removal of affected products from the market. The accuracy in record keeping barcoding and serialisation can be helpful in facilitating the tracking of products throughout the supplies in management that can be helpful in aiding the pinpointing of the sources of contamination along with the prevention of further distribution of the compromised items.
- Emerging Technologies in Food Safety: Advancements in technology have a crucial role in enhancing food safety and control measures. The blockchain technology, for instance, is helpful in increasing the explored ability to provide an immutable and transparent record of the entire supply chain management. This decentralised ledger can be helpful in ensuring that the information is about the origin, processing and distribution of food products in terms of secured and verifiable aspects. In addition, the Internet of Things can allow for real-time communication monitoring of different parameters by enabling proactive identification of the deviations from established norms, along with facilitating immediate corrective actions that can be helpful in mitigating the contamination risks. With the evolving technological advancements, the integration into food-related control measures is also holds the promise of creating a more resilient and responsive food safety system.
References
Abebe, E., Gugsa, G. and Ahmed, M. (2020). Review on Major Food-Borne Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2020, pp.1–19.doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4674235.
Akhtar, N., SyakirIshak, M.I., Bhawani, S.A. and Umar, K. (2021). Various Natural and Anthropogenic Factors Responsible for Water Quality Degradation: A Review. Water, [online] 13(19), p.2660.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192660.
Barone, P.W., Wiebe, M.E., Leung, J.C., Hussein, I.T.M., Keumurian, F.J., Bouressa, J., Brussel, A., Chen, D., Chong, M., Dehghani, H., Gerentes, L., Gilbert, J., Gold, D., Kiss, R., Kreil, T.R., Labatut, R., Li, Y., Müllberg, J., Mallet, L. and Menzel, C. (2020). Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies.Nature Biotechnology, [online] 38(5), pp.563–572.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0507-2.
Berge, A.C. and Baars, T. (2020).Raw milk producers with high levels of hygiene and safety.Epidemiology and Infection, 148.doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268820000060.
Bouzembrak, Y., Klüche, M., Gavai, A. and Marvin, H.J.P. (2019). Internet of Things in food safety: Literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 94, pp.54–64.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.002.
Brandt, K. and Driessen, S. (2011). Standard operating procedures (SOPs). [online] Umn.edu. Available at: https://extension.umn.edu/food-service-industry/standard-operating-procedures-sops.
Britishsoftdrinks (2023).Information for staff in the soft drinks industry. [online] www.britishsoftdrinks.com. Available at: https://www.britishsoftdrinks.com/Information-for-staff-in-the-soft-drinks-industry [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Chen, X., Ran, L., Liu, Q., Hu, Q., Du, X. and Tan, X. (2020). Hand Hygiene, Mask-Wearing Behaviors and Its Associated Factors during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Study among Primary School Students in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), p.2893.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082893.
Cornet, L. and Baurain, D. (2022). Contamination detection in genomic data: more is not enough. Genome Biology, 23(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02619-9.
Dodd, T., Guthrie, J. and Dumay, J. (2022). Management controls and modern slavery risks in the building and construction industry: Lessons from an Australian social housing provider. The British Accounting Review, p.101098. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101098.
Ehuwa, O., Jaiswal, A.K. and Jaiswal, S. (2021). Salmonella, Food Safety and Food Handling Practices.Foods, [online] 10(5), p.907.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10050907.
Elkington, J. (2020). Partnerships from Cannibals with forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st-century Business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), pp.37–51.doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106.
Etminan, N., Aguiar de Sousa, D., Tiseo, C., Bourcier, R., Desal, H., Lindgren, A., Koivisto, T., Netuka, D., Peschillo, S., Lémeret, S., Avtar, L., Vergouwen, M.D.I. and Rinkel, G.J. (2022). European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. European Stroke Journal, p.239698732210997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873221099736.
FAO (2023).FAO.org : [online] www.fao.org. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC063426/ [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Faour-Klingbeil, D. and C. D. Todd, E. (2019). Prevention and Control of Foodborne Diseases in Middle-East North African Countries: Review of National Control Systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), p.70.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010070.
Feng, A., Feng, J., Xing, W., Jiang, K. and Tang, W. (2023). Versatile applications of electrochemical flow-through systems in water treatment processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, [online] 473, p.145400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.145400.
Fischer, C., Siegel, J., Proeller, I. and Drathschmidt, N. (2022). Resilience through digitalisation: How individual and organisational resources affect public employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Management Review, pp.1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014.
Food Standards Agency (2016).Meat production and hygiene. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/meat-and-meat-hygiene.
Foodsafetyhelpline (2014).What all you need to know about Good Hygiene Practices? [online] Available at: https://foodsafetyhelpline.com/need-know-good-hygiene-practices/.
Foodsafetyhelpline (2023).FSSAI News, Updates & Compliance Training - Food Safety Helpline. [online] Available at: http://foodsafetyhelpline.com [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
GOV.UK (2015).Food labelling: giving food information to consumers. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/food-labelling-giving-food-information-to-consumers.
He, L. and Ismail, K. (2023). Do staff capacity and performance-based budgeting improve organisational performance? Empirical evidence from Chinese public universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01523-2.
Inspection (2019).Canadian Food Inspection Agency. [online] inspection.canada.ca. Available at: http://www.inspection.gc.ca [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Lebelo, K., Malebo, N., Mochane, M.J. and Masinde, M. (2021). Chemical Contamination Pathways and the Food Safety Implications along the Various Stages of Food Production: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(11), p.5795.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115795.
Legislation (2023).Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the european parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs. [online] Legislation.gov.uk. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/eur/2004/852 [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Li, Y., Tuckey, M.R., Neall, A.M., Rose, A. and Wilson, L. (2023). Changing the Underlying Conditions Relevant to Workplace Bullying through Organisational Redesign. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), p.4373. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054373.
Livestrong (2019). [online] LIVESTRONG.COM. Available at: http://www.livestrong.com/article/23346-high-acidic-foods-list [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Liyakat, K.K.S., Warhade, N.S., Pol, R.S., Jadhav, H.M. and Mulani, A.O. (2022). Yarn Quality detection for Textile Industries using Image Processing. JOURNAL OF ALGEBRAIC STATISTICS, [online] 13(3), pp.3465–3472. Available at: https://www.publishoa.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1124.
Ma, L., Chen, H., Yan, H., Wu, L. and Zhang, W. (2019).Food safety knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of street food vendors and consumers in Handan, a third tier city in China.BMC Public Health, 19(1).doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7475-9.
McFarland, P., ChecinskaSielaff, A., Rasco, B. and Smith, S. (2019). Efficacy of Food Safety Training in Commercial Food Service.Journal of Food Science, 84(6), pp.1239–1246.doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14628.
Mishra, S., Kumar, D. and Dubey, P. (2021).Source of Contamination and Effect of Food Processing on Pesticide Residue in Food.CRC Press eBooks, pp.163–179.doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003053170-6-6.
Nan, M., Xue, H. and Bi, Y. (2022). Contamination, Detection and Control of Mycotoxins in Fruits and Vegetables. Toxins, 14(5), p.309. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14050309.
Okpala, C.O.R. and Korzeniowska, M. (2021).Understanding the Relevance of Quality Management in Agro-food Product Industry: From Ethical Considerations to Assuring Food Hygiene Quality Safety Standards and Its Associated Processes.Food Reviews International, [online] 39(4), pp.1–74.doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.1938600.
Olaimat, A.N., Shahbaz, H.M., Fatima, N., Munir, S. and Holley, R.A. (2020).Food Safety During and After the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in Microbiology, [online] 11.doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01854.
Palansooriya, K.N., Yang, Y., Tsang, Y.F., Sarkar, B., Hou, D., Cao, X., Meers, E., Rinklebe, J., Kim, K.-H.and Ok, Y.S. (2019). Occurrence of contaminants in drinking water sources and the potential of biochar for water quality improvement: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 50(6), pp.549–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1629803.
Park, J.M., Kim, J.M., Lee, A.R., Cho, H.M., Hong, J.W. and Ghim, S. (2018). The Korean food franchise industry: Diverse development and conceptual definitions of a food safety managing body. Journal of Food Safety, 39(2), p.e12595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12595.
Prüss-Ustün, A., Wolf, J., Bartram, J., Clasen, T., Cumming, O., Freeman, M.C., Gordon, B., Hunter, P.R., Medlicott, K. and Johnston, R. (2019). Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: An updated analysis with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, [online] 222(5), pp.765–777.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.05.004.
Qiu, C., Li, A., Kloft, M., Rudolph, M. and Mandt, S. (2022). Latent Outlier Exposure for Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Data. [online] proceedings.mlr.press. Available at: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/qiu22b.html [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Raj, S.K. and Singh, N.K. (2021).Strategizing of Fast Food Industries using A Balanced Scorecard Approach: A Case Study of McDonald’s Corporation. [online] papers.ssrn.com. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3788050.
Sarkar, S., Gil, J.D.B., Keeley, J. and Jansen, K. (2021).The use of pesticides in developing countries and their impact on health and the right to food. [online] library.wur.nl. Available at: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/583698 [Accessed 8 Apr. 2023].
Shabani, T., Jerie, S. and Shabani, T. (2023). The impact of occupational safety and health programs on employee productivity and organisational performance in Zimbabwe. Safety in extreme environments. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-023-00083-7.
Sharman, N., Wallace, C.A. and Jespersen, L. (2020). Terminology and the understanding of culture, climate, and behavioural change – Impact of organisational and human factors on food safety management. Trends in Food Science & Technology, [online] 96, pp.13–20.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.005.
Shaw, F.L. (2018). The importance of food safety and hygiene.Journal of Food: Microbiology, Safety & Hygiene, 03. doi:https://doi.org/10.4172/2476-2059-c2-011.
Singleton (2023).Singleton Group: Food Allergens. [online] www.singleton-associates.org. Available at: https://www.singleton-associates.org/free-training-downloads/food-allergens/ [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Snowdon, D.A., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Marsh, L., Parker, E., Naude, K. and Andrew, N.E. (2023). A landscape assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measures in research, quality improvement and clinical care across a healthcare organisation. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09050-1.
Swissinternationalhotels (2022).Hotels. [online] Swiss International Hotels & Resorts | Royal Swiss | Swiss Spirit.Available at: http://www.swissinternationalhotels.com/operationsportal/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/SOP-Food-Safety-Hygiene-17_06.pdf) [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Tan, R.K.J., Ho, V., Sherqueshaa, S., Dee, W., Lim, J.M., Lo, J.J.-M., Teo, A.K.J., O’Hara, C.A., Ong, C., Ching, A.H., West, B.S. and Wong, M.L. (2021). COVID-19 and the shifting organisation of sex work markets in Singapore. Culture, Health & Sexuality, pp.1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.2014975.
Todd, E. (2020). Food-Borne Disease Prevention and Risk Assessment.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), p.5129.doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145129.
Ulhas Sopanrao Kadam and Jong Chan Hong (2022). Advances in aptameric biosensors designed to detect toxic contaminants from food, water, human fluids, and the environment. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 36, pp.e00184–e00184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00184.
Undas, A.K., Groenen, M., Peters, R.J.B. and van Leeuwen, S.P.J. (2023). Safety of recycled plastics and textiles: Review on the detection, identification and safety assessment of contaminants. Chemosphere, [online] 312, p.137175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137175.
Warwick (2022).High and low risk foods. [online] warwick.ac.uk. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/services/healthsafetywellbeing/guidance/foodhygieneandsafety/highandlowriskfoods/.
WHO (2018).WHO South-East Asia | World Health Organization. [online] Who.int. Available at: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/ [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Wijethilake, C., Upadhaya, B. and Lama, T. (2021). The role of organisational culture in organisational change towards sustainability: evidence from the garment manufacturing industry. Production Planning & Control, [online] 34(3), pp.1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1913524.
Yu, W., Kwoba, E., Mwangi, T., Wanza, P., Wright, J. and Okotto-Okotto, J. (2019).Water sources and contamination hazards in Siaya County, Kenya 2018. [online] reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk. Available at: https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/id/eprint/853705 [Accessed 11 Dec. 2023].
Zamora-Ledezma, C., Negrete-Bolagay, D., Figueroa, F., Zamora-Ledezma, E., Ni, M., Alexis, F. and Guerrero, V.H. (2021). Heavy metal water pollution: A fresh look about hazards, novel and conventional remediation methods. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, p.101504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101504.