The Transport for London (TFL) case exhibits a situation where the association is juggling with the repetitive test of strikes, especially with regard to the London train and tube facilities. This present circumstance requires an essential survey of the Human Resource (HR) rehearses inside TFL to improve seriousness in the worldwide commercial centre. As an HRM Specialist, the goal is to give sensible proposals based on pertinent hypotheses of Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) and its job in encouraging a superior execution association.
Key Definitions
Prior to digging into the points of interest, characterizing significant terms for a thorough comprehension of the study is basic. Human Resource Management (HRM) includes the coordination and the executives of an association's labour force, enveloping hiring, preparing execution management, and worker relations. Conversely, Personnel Management is a conventional methodology principally worried with managerial errands, administrative consistency, and workers welfare.
Main Aims of the Study
The main aim of this study is to direct an exhaustive examination of Transport for London's (TFL) HRM exercises, utilizing important speculations in SHRM. The review tries to depict the qualifications among HRM and Personnel Management, , utilizing Story's model to direct the basic assessment. Furthermore, it means examining TFL's essential needs in HR works on, adjusting them to hierarchical objectives to guarantee a synergistic methodology. Besides, by applying SHRM models, the review tries to investigate TFL's "Model of Work," disentangling the hierarchical switches accessible for overseeing HR in a way that adds to the maintainable upper hand. Ultimately, the review dives into TFL's hierarchical culture, inspecting its effect on SHRM and giving experiences to upgrade the general adequacy of HR rehearses inside the association . Through these examinations, the review expects to outfit vital suggestions for TFL to flourish in the worldwide commercial centre.
Distinguishing Human Resource Management (HRM) and Personnel Management through the lens of Storey's Model Perspective
A useful structure for analysing the key distinctions among Personnel Management and Human Resource Management (HRM) is offered by Storey's model. Although handling individuals inside a company is the focus of the two methods, there are differences in their responsibilities, introductions, and tactical repercussions.
Defining HRM and Personnel Management
Considering the Story's Model Human Resource Management (HRM) is a key and exhaustive way to deal with an association's most important resource which is usually its labour force. Unlike to customary Personnel Management, which essentially centres around managerial errands and administrative consistency, HRM takes a proactive and forward-looking position. It perceives Workerss as essential accomplices and urgent supporters of hierarchical achievement. In HRM, the accentuation is on adjusting human resources to the general targets of the association (Krausert, 2017). This includes drawing in and holding ability as well as creating and connecting with workers to ceaselessly improve their abilities and skills. HRM assumes a critical part in making an elite exhibition culture inside the association, where workers are persuaded, dedicated, and contribute really to accomplishing business objectives. One of the distinctive elements of HRM is its essential direction (Lengnick-Hall et al., 2009). It coordinates HR arrangements and practices with the, generally speaking, vital course of the association. HRM is worried about expecting future difficulties and adjusting the labour force in like manner, making it a dynamic and versatile capability inside the hierarchical construction. Basically, HRM goes ahead of the conditional parts of the workforce management and effectively adds to moulding the hierarchical culture, encouraging positive Worker’s relations, and eventually guaranteeing that the HR inside the association is a wellspring of the practical upper hand(Cakar and Bititci, 2002).
Personnel Management is a customary and managerial way to deal with an association's labour force, fundamentally centred around taking care of routine errands and guaranteeing consistency with work regulations and guidelines. In contrast to the key and forward-looking nature of HRM, Personnel Management will in general be more receptive and rule-bound. It is frequently portrayed by a conditional connection among businesses and Workerss, centring on undertakings like finance, benefits organization, and keeping up with staff records (Truss and Gratton, 1994). The essential objective of Personnel Management is to address quick requirements connected with worker government assistance, finance handling, and administrative consistency. It normally includes normalized techniques and a progressive design, where choices are concentrated inside the HR office. In this structure, the job of staff directors is more mandated, managing issues as they emerge as opposed to proactively forming the association's drawn-out procedure(Jackson, Schuler and Jiang, 2014). While Personnel Management guarantees the smooth working of HR-related processes, it might miss the mark on the essential profundity and Workers-driven centre seen in HRM. Its methodology is much of the time more administrative, with an accentuation on following laid out techniques and conventions. In synopsis, Personnel Management are a more conventional and regulatory model, basically worried about the conditional parts of labour force the board as opposed to the essential arrangement and improvement stressed by HRM(Guest, 1991).
Strategic Management with regards to Story's Model differentiates the HRM from Personnel Management by its essential direction. While HRM coordinates human resources with hierarchical objectives, encouraging a proactive and forward-looking methodology, Personnel Management contrary is more receptive and regulatory. Key Administration in HRM includes adjusting labour force practices to the generally essential bearing of the association, guaranteeing that HR contribute decisively to long haul achievement. This essential center incorporates ability advancement, Workers commitment, and expecting future difficulties, separating HRM from the more prompt and rule-bound nature of Personnel Management (Armstrong and Taylor, 2023).
Nature of Relationship
In Story's Model, the Idea of Relationship is a central issue in recognizing HRM from Personnel Management. HRM cultivates a shared responsibility among managers and workers, regarding them as essential accomplices. This approach underlines joint effort, shared goals, and a proactive position in dealing with the labour force. Conversely, Personnel Management ordinarily keeps a more mandate relationship, complying with laid-out rules and guidelines without a similar accentuation on shared responsibility. HRM's social methodology looks to draw in and persuade the labour force, while Personnel Management may frequently centre more on consistency and implementing laid-out techniques (Geethanjali et al., 2023).
Employee Development and Training
Employee Development and Training, inside Story's Model, enlighten the differentiation between HRM and Personnel Management. HRM focuses on persistent picking up, seeing workers as significant resources whose abilities ought to be improved for hierarchical achievement. It puts resources into preparing programs, coaching, and professional improvement to cultivate a talented and versatile labour force. On the other hand, Personnel Management, while tending to essential preparation needs, may not underscore progressing improvement similarly. The qualification lies in HRM's essential way of dealing with expertise upgrade, adding to a more unique and able labour force contrasted with the more daily schedule and responsive preparation rehearses related to Personnel Management.
Role of Line Managers
Story's Model underscores the Role of Line Managers as an urgent differentiation between Human Resource Management (HRM) and Personnel Management. In HRM, there is a decentralization of HR capabilities, including line chiefs involved effectively in HR exercises. This implies a common obligation through the association to oversee individuals decisively. On the other hand, Personnel Management will in general unify HR capabilities, avoiding line chiefs at all costs from key HR choices. HRM perceives line chiefs as basic to HR exercises, elevating a cooperative way to deal with the labour force the executives, while Personnel Management might keep a more order and progressive connection between line directors and HR capabilities(Cayrat and Boxall, 2023).
Examining TFL's Strategic Priorities in HR Practices
Transport for London (TFL) has reached a turning point in its history because it works to improve its standing in the worldwide business sector while navigating the difficulties caused by ongoing protests. A detailed analysis of the business's goals for its human resource (HR) procedures is necessary in order to tackle these problems. The "High-Performance Work System" (HPWS) paradigm will be used in this investigation to offer suggestions for the manner in which TFL could connect its HR procedures with the company's goals and promote an atmosphere of high performance.
Strategic Alignment with Organizational Objectives
TFL's HR practices ought to be complicatedly connected with the association's more extensive objectives. A superior exhibition work framework guarantees that HR drives are not confined yet decisively lined up with TFL's main goal and vision. This arrangement becomes critical in tending to difficulties, for example, strikes and guaranteeing that the labour force contributes actually to the association's prosperity. In that case, The HPWS model suggests, that underscoring the mix of HR rehearses with key objectives, gives a focal point to assess TFL's arrangement. Tactical HR rehearses, like talent management and development, ought to be intended to help TFL's targets, adding to a stronger and more serious association(Sharma and Behl, 2020).
Employee Development and Training
Putting resources into ceaseless learning and advancement is pivotal for TFL to furnish its labour force with the abilities expected to address developing difficulties. Key needs ought to incorporate strong preparation projects, mentorship, and vocation improvement to open doors that line up with the association's essential bearing. The HPWS model features the meaning of worker improvement in accomplishing superior execution. TFL ought to centre in on making a learning society, using the model's accentuation on preparing and expertise upgrade to cultivate a labor force equipped for adjusting to dynamic circumstances( INDIA, 2020).
Employee Engagement and Positive Relations
Tactical HR needs should incorporate drives to improve Worker’s commitment and encourage positive relations. Tending to worries, for example, strikes require a labor force that is propelled, dedicated, and feels esteemed inside the association. Worker’s commitment is a critical component in the HPWS model. TFL ought to investigate drives that advance correspondence, cooperation, and common regard among Workers, as this lines up with the model's accentuation on establishing a positive workplace helpful for superior execution(Abdullahi et al., 2021).
Key needs ought to incorporate talent management procedures that distinguish, draw in, and hold gifted people. In the midst of strikes, guaranteeing the accessibility of a great labor force becomes basic for TFL to proceed with progress. The HPWS model underlines the essential job of talent management to accomplish hierarchical objectives. TFL ought to take on rehearses that line up with this model, centring in on procuring and holding ability that adds to the association's superior presentation (Abdullahi et al., 2021).
Flexibility and Adaptability
Integrating adaptability and versatility into HR rehearses is fundamental for TFL to answer actually to disturbances brought about by strikes or other unanticipated occasions. An essential methodology ought to include HR drives that improve hierarchical nimbleness. The HPWS model perceives the significance of authoritative adaptability. TFL can use this model to plan HR rehearses that take into consideration flexibility, empowering the association to answer quickly to changing conditions and moderate the effect of interruptions (Abdullahi et al., 2021).
Line Manager Involvement in HR Activities
Key needs ought to involve the dynamic association of line chiefs in HR exercises. Decentralizing HR works and drawing in line chiefs guarantees a common obligation regarding overseeing individuals decisively all through the association. The HPWS model highlights the job of line directors in HR exercises. TFL can adjust its essential needs to this model by advancing cooperation among HR and line directors, perceiving their basic job in forming an elite presentation work framework (Kravariti et al., 2022).
Overall, it can be depicted from the discussion that analysing TFL's essential needs in HR rehearses is fundamental to tending to difficulties like strikes and upgrading worldwide seriousness. Utilizing the High-Performance Work System (HPWS) model, TFL can adjust its HR drives to hierarchical objectives, encouraging a strong and serious labor force. By decisively focusing on regions like talent management worker improvement and positive relations, TFL can explore disturbances successfully and position itself as a superior execution association in the unique worldwide commercial centre.
Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) Analysis of TFL's Model of Employment
Transport for London (TFL) confronts the basics of adjusting its "Model of Employment" with key human resource management practices to encourage a reasonable upper hand. This conversation will fundamentally examine TFL's ongoing business model, underscoring the High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) inside the SHRM structure. It will investigate how TFL can use hierarchical switches to upgrade its HR, guaranteeing a labor force that contributes really to long-haul achievement.
TFL's Model of Employment Critical Assessment
Transport for London's (TfL's) Model of Employment is going through a basic evaluation, mirroring a unique shift impacted by difficulties like repetitive strikes and the basis of worldwide intensity. At its centre, the model gives off an impression of progressing from customary personnel management towards a more essential methodology. Generally, TFL could have inclined towards a standard bound and receptive personnel management model, underlining consistency and regulatory errands. Nevertheless, the ongoing scene, set apart by strikes and the requirement for flexibility, requires a shift towards vital HRM(Nyathi and Kekwaletswe, 2022). Considering progressing strikes, TFL's business model is probably reconsidering its way of dealing with communication, workers relations, and talent advancement. The model recognizes the significance of tending to quick labor force difficulties while perceiving the requirement for a more groundbreaking technique. Dealings with endorsers, generally connected with personnel management, are becoming entwined with a more extensive vital vision for the association's human resources. Furthermore, TFL's staff needs to be in line with the company's long-term goals in order to respond to its international seriousness. Initiatives for participation, employee growth, and recruiting talent are becoming more and more important parts of the framework. To strengthen its standing as an effective competitor in the international marketplace, TFL understands the importance of attracting, developing, and keeping top talent(Lu et al., 2022). This critical evaluation emphasizes how TFL's Theory of Work is dynamic. It is currently utilizing the concepts related to strategic hiring and firing to adjust to current difficulties. Through a systematic approach to workforce motion, discussions, and recruitment, TFL hopes to develop a hiring paradigm that not only helps the company maintain a competitive edge over time but also successfully addresses short-term issues like protests (Sandeepanie et al., 2022).
Leveraging High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS)
Utilizing High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) is essential to the tactical advancement of Transport for London's (TFL's) Model of Business, particularly because of difficulties like intermittent strikes and the quest for worldwide seriousness. HPWS underscores the incorporation of strategic human resource management practices to make a synergistic and high-performing hierarchical culture. In TFL's specific situation, taking on HPWS includes adjusting the talent development drives to the association's drawn-out goals. This incorporates drawing in skilled people, putting resources into strong preparation projects, and cultivating a learning society to improve labor force capacities (Asante et al., 2023). Worker improvement turns into a key concentration, guaranteeing that TFL's labor force isn't just outfitted with prompt abilities but is constantly developing to address dynamic difficulties. Furthermore, HPWS highlights the significance of worker commitment and positive relations, underscoring cooperation, correspondence, and shared regard. Intending to strike, a persuaded and connected labor force turns into an urgent resource. Moreover, authoritative adaptability and versatility, essential parts of HPWS, empower TFL to answer quickly to disturbances and explore changes in the working climate (Zhou et al., 2022). Decentralizing HR capabilities and effectively including line administrators lines up with HPWS standards, perceiving the essential job of directors in talent management and improvement. Basically, by utilizing HPWS, TFL's Model of Business is ready to encourage a superior exhibition culture, adjusting its human asset practices to hierarchical objectives, and adding to manageable upper hand in the worldwide commercial centre. This essential arrangement guarantees that HR drives address quick difficulties as well as position TFL decisively for long-haul achievement(Kim, Clark and Messersmith, 2022).
Organizational Levers for Sustainable Competitive Advantage
Organizational levers for the practical upper hand perform a major part in moulding Transport for London's (TfL's) Model of Work inside the High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) system. Key labor force, first and foremost, arranging arises as a basic switch, adjusting human asset practices to TfL's drawn-out objectives. By recognizing and developing fundamental jobs inside the association, TFL can guarantee an ability pipeline that straightforwardly upholds its essential needs. Additionally, carrying out vigorous performance management frameworks becomes instrumental in checking and improving representative commitments. HPWS proposes connecting individual and group execution straightforwardly to hierarchical objectives, making a culture of superior execution that contributes straightforwardly to TFL's upper hand. Tactical pay and rewards techniques address another significant lever(Monnagaaratwe and Mathu, 2022). By adjusting impetuses to execution, TFL can propel workers to succeed and contribute definitively to hierarchical achievement. These upgrades work fulfilment as well as helps in talent maintenance, a crucial component in supporting the upper hand in the powerful commercial centre. Powerful worker relations and discussion’s structure one more switch. Proactively addressing concerns and cultivating open correspondence channels add to a positive workplace, moderating the gamble of strikes and building a versatile labor force that straightforwardly influences TFL's drawn-out intensity. Moreover, innovation combined with HR rehearses turns into a fundamental lever in improving proficiency and adequacy. TFL can put resources into HR innovations that smooth out processes, work with information-driven independent direction, and back key drives. This mechanical influence guarantees that TFL stays at the very front of advancement in dealing with its HR, contributing fundamentally to its strategic advantage (Gao et al., 2023). Overall, it can be summarized from the above-mentioned discussion that, these hierarchical switches, when utilized inside the setting of TFL's Model of Business and the HPWS structure, offer an essential pathway towards a feasible upper hand. Whether through essential labor force arranging, execution management, remuneration techniques, powerful worker relations, or mechanical coordination, these switches on the whole add to advancing HR and situating TFL decisively for long-haul outcomes in the worldwide commercial center.
Exploring TFL's Organizational Culture and its Impact on Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM)
Transport for London (TFL) works inside a dynamic and complicated climate set apart by strikes, worldwide rivalry, and the requirement for a strong labor force. Understanding TFL's hierarchical culture and its effect on SHRM is vital for adjusting human asset practices to the organization's essential goals.
TFL's Organizational Culture
Transport for London (TFL) displays a multi-layered hierarchical culture molded by its verifiable importance, functional difficulties, and obligation to public help. Established in custom, TfL's culture mirrors a mix of regulatory proficiency and a commitment to somewhere safe and secure and unwavering quality. The association's vital job in giving transportation administrations to millions in a clamoring city highlights its obligation to public help, impacting a culture that focuses on consumer loyalty. This responsibility is additionally highlighted by the significance put on security conventions and adherence to guidelines. TFL's hierarchical culture additionally faces the impact of outside factors, like repetitive strikes, requiring flexibility and strength. Fundamentally, TFL's way of life is described by a harmony among customs and a contemporary key viewpoint, underlining productivity, client care, and flexibility to explore the intricacies of the transportation business in a powerful metropolitan climate(Lawrence, 2024).
Impact on SHRM
TFL's hierarchical culture fundamentally impacts its Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) work, molding the systems utilized to actually deal with its labor force. The accentuation on security and unwavering quality inside the hierarchical culture straightforwardly influences SHRM by focusing on representative commitment and execution. TFL's obligation to be somewhere safe lines up with SHRM standards, requiring drives that improve workers' obligation to hierarchical objectives, underscoring the significance of keeping a protected and solid public transportation framework. Moreover, the cultural interest in adaptability and versatility is reflected in SHRM techniques, requiring the improvement of an agile labor force equipped for answering unique conditions, an essential perspective in an industry set apart by repetitive strikes and startling difficulties. The social spotlight on open help and consumer loyalty guides SHRM in talent management and improvement, impacting enrollment methodologies that focus on credits lined up with TFL's social qualities. Besides, the TFLS culture effect on correspondence and cooperation converts into SHRM drives that focus on straightforward correspondence channels, cultivating a positive hierarchical environment. By perceiving and utilizing TFL's social components, SHRM guarantees arrangement with the association's essential objectives, adding to a drawn-in, versatile, and high-performing labor force. This arrangement tends to prompt difficulties as well as improve TFL's upper hand by cultivating a labor force that exemplifies the social qualities pivotal for outcome in the powerful transportation scene (Lawrence, 2024).
Leveraging TFL's Culture for SHRM Excellence
Utilizing Transport for London's (TFL) unique authoritative culture is basic for accomplishing greatness in Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM). Social arrangement in HR strategies, initially, is fundamental. By guaranteeing that HR strategies resound with TFL's social qualities like well-being, dependability, and public help — a feeling of common perspective is developed among workers, improving their obligation to hierarchical goals. Correspondence techniques likewise assume an imperative part. Given the meaning of straightforward correspondence in TFL's way of life, SHRM ought to focus on clear and open channels of correspondence. Ordinary and straightforward correspondence about HR strategies, changes, and execution assumptions adds to a positive hierarchical environment, reinforcing worker confidence and responsibility. Moreover, coordinating TFL's social accentuation on security and productivity in preparing programs is vital. SHRM ought to configure preparing drives that line up with TFL's social needs, improving representative abilities in regions like wellbeing conventions and proficient assistance conveyance. This not only supports TFL's obligation to its basic beliefs but also guarantees that the labor force is prepared to exemplify these qualities in their day-to-day exercises. Fundamentally, utilizing TFL's culture for SHRM greatness includes adjusting HR arrangements and correspondence systems as well as incorporating social needs into representative preparation programs. This essential arrangement guarantees that SHRM rehearses resound with TfL's extraordinary social personality, encouraging a labor force that isn't just capable in their jobs but additionally profoundly associated with the hierarchical qualities pivotal for supported progress in the complicated transportation industry (Gao et al., 2023).
Conclusion
Overall, it can be concluded from the study that the complete assessment of Transport for London's (TFL) Human Resource Management rehearses uncovers an intricate interaction between its hierarchical culture, key needs, and the use of key human asset the board (SHRM) models. TFL, because of difficulties like repetitive strikes and the quest for worldwide seriousness, is going through an outstanding change in its Model of Business. The association's social credits, including a verifiable obligation to somewhere safe, proficiency, and public help, fundamentally shape its way of dealing with HR rehearses. decisively, TfL's accentuation on arrangement with hierarchical objectives, talent management, and a guarantee to representative improvement positions it in a great position for tending to current difficulties and future vulnerabilities. The suspension of strikes and positive talks demonstrate an eagerness to adjust HR rehearses because of the necessities of both the association and its labor force.
The consolidation of SHRM models, especially the High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS), arises as a basic system for TFL. By utilizing HPWS standards, TFL can decisively adjust talent management, worker improvement, and commitment drives with its drawn-out objectives, encouraging an elite execution hierarchical culture. Furthermore, the investigation of hierarchical switches, for example, essential labor force arranging, performance management, and innovation incorporation gives a guide to TFL to accomplish a reasonable upper hand through enhanced human asset rehearses. Moreover, the assessment of TFL's hierarchical culture and its effect on SHRM highlights the significance of social arrangement in forming HR approaches, correspondence methodologies, and preparing programs. The capacity to use the particular social ascribes of well-being, effectiveness, and public assistance positions TFL to address prompt difficulties like strikes as well as add to supported progress in the consistently developing transportation scene. Generally, TFL's excursion towards HR excellence includes an essential realignment of its work model, utilizing SHRM models, and embracing its remarkable hierarchical culture. Thus, TFL is ready to develop a labor force that explores current difficulties skillfully as well as adds to the association's drawn-out progress and upper hand on the worldwide stage.
Need Academic Help Without the Hassle?
Tired of late nights and deadline anxiety? Our Assignment Help service offers expert-written solutions tailored to your subject and requirements. With our fast turnaround, detailed research, and guaranteed originality, you’ll never miss a deadline again. Get top-quality academic support—all in just a few clicks.
References
Abdullahi, M.S., Raman, K., Solarin, S.A. and Adeiza, A., 2021. Employee engagement as a mediating variable on the relationship between employee relation practice and employee performance in a developing economy. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, [online] 15(1), pp.83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-06-2021-0222.
Anon 2020. DEVELOPMENT OF VARIOUS TRAINING METHODS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT AMONG MICROENTREPRENEURS IN INDIA. Journal of critical reviews, [online] 7(12). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.12.372.
Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S., 2023. Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. [online] Kogan Page Publishers. Available at: <http://books.google.ie/books?id=3oChEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=1398606642&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api>.
Asante, D., Tang, C., Asante, E.A., Kwamega, M. and Opoku-Danso, A., 2023. Leveraging perceived HPWS to improve service encounter quality in high-contact service industries. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, [online] 73, p.103344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103344.
Cakar, F. and Bititci, U.S., 2002. Modelling in the HRM business process. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, [online] 2(3/4), p.223. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijhrdm.2002.001027.
Cayrat, C. and Boxall, P., 2023. The roles of the HR function: A systematic review of tensions, continuity and change. Human Resource Management Review, [online] 33(4), p.100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100984.
Gao, J., Zhang, W., Guan, T., Feng, Q. and Mardani, A., 2023. The effect of manufacturing agent heterogeneity on enterprise innovation performance and competitive advantage in the era of digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, [online] 155, p.113387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113387.
Geethanjali, N., Ashifa, K.M., Raina, A., Patil, J., Byloppilly, R. and Rajest, S.S., 2023. Application of Strategic Human Resource Management Models for Organizational Performance. Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, [online] pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2193-5.ch001.
Guest, D.E., 1991. Personnel Management: The End of Orthodoxy? British Journal of Industrial Relations, [online] 29(2), pp.149–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1991.tb00235.x.
Jackson, S.E., Schuler, R.S. and Jiang, K., 2014. An Aspirational Framework for Strategic Human Resource Management. Academy of Management Annals, [online] 8(1), pp.1–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.872335.
Kim, K.Y., Clark, K.D. and Messersmith, J.G., 2022. High performance work systems and perceived organizational support: The contribution of human resource department’s organizational embodiment. Human Resource Management, [online] 62(2), pp.181–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22142.
Krausert, A., 2017. The HRM–capital market link: Effects of securities analysts on strategic human capital. Human Resource Management, [online] 57(1), pp.97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21841.
Kravariti, F., Tasoulis, K., Scullion, H. and Alali, M.K., 2022. Talent management and performance in the public sector: the role of organisational and line managerial support for development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, [online] 34(9), pp.1782–1807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2032265.
Lawrence, I., 2024. London Train Strikes January & February 2024: Tube, Rail & Overground Strike Dates For Aslef & TfL. [online] Time Out London. Available at: <https://www.timeout.com/london/news/london-train-strikes-everything-you-need-to-know-021723>.
Lengnick-Hall, M.L., Lengnick-Hall, C.A., Andrade, L.S. and Drake, B., 2009. Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Human Resource Management Review, [online] 19(2), pp.64–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.01.002.
Lu, Y., Zhang, M.M., Yang, M.M. and Wang, Y., 2022. Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, [online] 62(3), pp.331–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22153.
Monnagaaratwe, K.F. and Mathu, K., 2022. Supply chain management as a competitive advantage for grocery small and medium-sized enterprises in Mahikeng, South Africa. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, [online] 16. https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.791.
Nyathi, M. and Kekwaletswe, R., 2022. Realizing employee and organizational performance gains through electronic human resource management use in developing countries. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, [online] 14(1), pp.121–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-11-2021-0489.
Sandeepanie, M.H.R., Gamage, P., Perera, G.D.N. and Sajeewani, T.L., 2022. The role of talent management and employee psychological contract on employer branding: a pragmatic conceptual model. Management Research Review, [online] 46(2), pp.196–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-02-2021-0136.
Sharma, S. and Behl, R., 2020. Strategic Alignment of Information Technology in Public and Private Organizations in India: A Comparative Study. Global Business Review, [online] 24(2), pp.335–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919893839.
Truss, C. and Gratton, L., 1994. Strategic human resource management: a conceptual approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, [online] 5(3), pp.663–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199400000053.
Zhou, Q., Edafioghor, T.E., Wu, C. and Doherty, B., 2022. Building organisational resilience capability in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of high‐performance work systems. Human Resource Management Journal, [online] 33(4), pp.806–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12479.
