What Factors Influence An Individual In Their Choice To Have a COVID-19 Vaccine?
INTRODUCTION
Currently there are many different kind of the issues which the health and social care is facing. There are many different external issues which might impact and hamper the working of the healthcare sector. In the current essay, the discussion relating to the various factors affecting the decision of the person to take the vaccine will be analysed. There are many different reason for which some people have not taken the vaccines. The current essay will evaluate which factors affected the decision of people not taking up the vaccine. There were many different types of the elements and factors which guided the person in taking the decision of taking the vaccines. The most common issue was the social influence as the people were getting influenced by the other people who have taken up the vaccine and were not feeling well. Thus, the present study will be evaluating the current factors which have resulted in people not taking up the vaccines.
MAIN BODY
One of the sources by Cook et al, (2022) outlined within the article that there was a lower uptake of the vaccine for COVID even though the risk of pandemic was increasing. Due to pandemic very negative impact were created on the health of the people and even then they were not ready to get the vaccines. With the result of the study it was analysed that the major reason which resisted the people to not take the vaccine was the age and the ethnicity. These are the two different types of the reason which influenced the people within the country to not take the vaccine (Kamal, Hodson and Pearce, 2021). Along with this the study also highlighted that another crucial reason for not taking the vaccine was the lack of trust within the government and other regulatory bodies. Among the citizen of the country there was a high distrust and resultantly the overall working was impacted and people were not interested in taking up the vaccines.
On the other side, the views of Butter et al, (2022) was that there was high vaccine hesitancy and this was a growing concern for the public health. Hence, the study outlined that there are many different types of the factors like the social, psychological, situational and many others which might impact the decision of person taking up the vaccine. With the study of the article, it was clear that the major reason behind the vaccine hesitancy was that there was delay in acceptance for taking up the vaccine (Purvis et al, 2022). It is due to the reason that the vaccines are available but people are not readily accepting the application of the vaccines. Along with this, perception of risk is also another factor highlighted in the article. It is due to the reason that the people perceived that the taking up of vaccine might become riskier for their health. Thus, as a result of this it might impact the health of the people taking up the vaccines.
The methodology used in the source 1 included a community survey which was conducted with a total of 1058 residents coming from Luton UK. The questions within the survey were centred on the intention and up taking of the vaccines by the residents in Luton. On the other side, the source 2 was based on the research design of cross-sectional study. Further the sample was of adults from UK who have completed 1 month follow-up of study based on COVID 19 Psychological Well-Being are indicated to have been diagnosed with COVID previously. The total sample includes 584 for the key workers and 1021 for the non-key workers. The people within this group were compared in relation to the intention to get vaccinated and also the level of perceived risk relating to the infection which the people have in their mind.
Moreover, the findings of Cook (2022), outlined that the major reason identified for people not taking the vaccine included their beliefs, health condition, information and other reason. Some of the respondent stated that they have seen many of the vaccinated people having different side effects and as a result of this they fear that if they get vaccinated then their body might impact the working the capability (Goffe et al, 2021). Thus, as a result of this the people are not comfortable while taking the vaccine. Also, some of them are feeling fearful in getting vaccine as they might face different types of the issues and health concerns. This can impact the overall health effects and ultimately the health concerns are impacted.
In against of this, the Butter (2022) summarised the finding that the social, psychological and the situations factors impact the decision of the person in relation to taking the vaccines. The result outlined that the key workers were having a higher perceived risk that they will be infected in the coming months if they take up the vaccines. The people had the intention for vaccine but they are not confident to get the vaccine. This is because of the reason that when the social, psychological and situational factors are not supportive then this can affect the working of the people to a great extent (Robertson et al, 2021). But the source also evaluated that if the good public health campaign will be organised at the community level then it might be possible that people might be motivated to take the vaccines. Hence, as a result the interest of the people might be generated towards the up taking of vaccines so that the overall efficiency is improved. Thus, when the general public will be educated towards the benefits of the taking up the vaccines then it will be improving the overall efficiency greatly
Further the similarities among both the articles included the fact that they all focused on analysing of the factors which might impact the intake of vaccines by the people. This was the major similarity among the articles and its finding that it emphasised on analysing the reason due to which the people were not happy in taking vaccines (Sherman et al, 2021). On the other hand, the difference in both the articles was that the population of the study was different. In the source 1 the population included the residents from Luton UK and in source 2 it was adults from UK which were further divided in two categories that is key workers and not key workers. Thus, the outcome and conclusion of the study was different but the aim of both the sources were same that is analysing the factors which have led to influencing people not to take the vaccines. The aim was of identify the factors which are affecting the mindset of the people for not taking up the vaccine and trying to work on these factors so that the more and more people come and take up the vaccine to protect themselves from the negative effects of pandemic.
Lastly, it can be stated that both the articles were providing reliable and authentic information. This is particularly because of the reason that both the sources are peer-reviewed and as a result it provides for a better information. Moreover, all the information provided is latest and the articles are published on 2022 and 2021 respectively. This implies that all the correct and related information is provided according the requirement of the study. Further, the effective types of the research methods are implemented in both the articles which provided more accurate and reliable results (McPhedran et al, 2022). In addition to this all the ethical consideration are followed within the study which ensures that the research is done in ethical manner. The ethical considerations were included within the study and this made it easier for the researcher to improve the working better so that the study can provide for better result which will be assisting the people to understand the importance of getting vaccinated and try to increase the efficiency better.
CONCLUSION
At last it is concluded that maintaining a good health and social care is very important to the country to maintain a good working. In case there will be issues relating to health and social care then it might be impacting the working capability greatly. Currently the countries all over the world were facing the issue of pandemic and the negative effects it has created on the working. The above study evaluated that post COVID recovery the people were not interested in taking up the vaccines. There were certain types of the factors which affected the mindset of people to take up the vaccines. It included factors like social, perceived risk that after taking vaccine the people will get infected, lack of trust in government officials and many other different reason. All these factors demotivated the people from taking up the vaccines and as a result of this they were not interested in taking up the vaccine. On the contrary some suggestions were also suggested like the organising of the public health campaign and educating the people with the benefits of taking up vaccine and other can be used for managing the working better.
Health and social care assignments on public health topics require critical comparison of research, clear evaluation of methodologies, and well-supported conclusions. Many students find it difficult to synthesise multiple studies, maintain academic structure, and critically discuss factors such as trust, risk perception, and social influence. Professional assignment help can assist in strengthening critical analysis, improving academic writing, and ensuring accurate referencing, helping you meet assessment criteria and achieve higher grades with confidence.
REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Butter, S., McGlinchey, E., Berry, E. and Armour, C., 2022. Psychological, social, and situational factors associated with COVID‐19 vaccination intentions: A study of UK key workers and non‐key workers. British Journal of Health Psychology, 27(1), pp.13-29.
Cook, E.J., Elliott, E., Gaitan, A., Nduka, I., Cartwright, S., Egbutah, C., Randhawa, G., Waqar, M. and Ali, N., 2022. Vaccination against COVID-19: factors that influence vaccine hesitancy among an ethnically diverse community in the UK. Vaccines, 10(1), p.106.
Goffe, L., Antonopoulou, V., Meyer, C.J., Graham, F., Tang, M.Y., Lecouturier, J., Grimani, A., Bambra, C., Kelly, M.P. and Sniehotta, F.F., 2021. Factors associated with vaccine intention in adults living in England who either did not want or had not yet decided to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(12), pp.5242-5254.
Kamal, A., Hodson, A. and Pearce, J.M., 2021. A rapid systematic review of factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination uptake in minority ethnic groups in the UK. Vaccines, 9(10), p.1121.
McPhedran, R., Gold, N., Bemand, C., Weston, D., Rosen, R., Scott, R., Chadborn, T., Amlôt, R., Mawby, M. and Toombs, B., 2022. Location, location, location: a discrete choice experiment to inform COVID-19 vaccination programme delivery in the UK. BMC Public Health, 22(1), p.431.
Purvis, R.S., Moore, R., Willis, D.E., Hallgren, E. and McElfish, P.A., 2022. Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among hesitant adopters in the United States. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 18(6), p.2114701.
Robertson, E., Reeve, K.S., Niedzwiedz, C.L., Moore, J., Blake, M., Green, M., Katikireddi, S.V. and Benzeval, M.J., 2021. Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study. Brain, behavior, and immunity, 94, pp.41-50.
Sherman, S.M., Smith, L.E., Sim, J., Amlôt, R., Cutts, M., Dasch, H., Rubin, G.J. and Sevdalis, N., 2021. COVID-19 vaccination intention in the UK: results from the COVID-19 vaccination acceptability study (CoVAccS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 17(6), pp.1612-1621.
