Social Care Housing Trends and Government Efficiency Strategies Case Study

Social Care Housing Trends and Government Efficiency Strategies

Introduction: Social Care Housing Trends and Government Efficiency Strategies

A report will analyze on the trend in the social care housing sector in England, with a exacting center on the government's efforts to save costs and get better competence. The key features of the report will demonstrate on considerate of the role of data in healthcare research, including data formats and analysis method used to make informed decisions, predict trends, and present analytical facts and statistics.

The report will be accessible to a cross-party group of MPs on a fact-finding mission, and as such, it is essential to provide an inclusive and educational outline of the social care housing sector in England, and also insights into the government's current thinking on improving competence and cost-effectiveness.

Don’t know how to start your report or case study? Our Help with Assignment offers complete support—from brainstorming to final draft. Let experts take the lead—click here!

Critically discussing the legislative history and framework

The concept of 'value for money' has been a key deliberation in the legislative history and framework of healthcare in the United Kingdom. The term refers to the standard of ensuring that resources are used in the most well-organized and efficient way possible to achieve preferred outcomes. In the early years of the NHS, the focus was first and foremost on providing healthcare services to all UK residents, in spite of their capability to pay (Cadersaib, et. al. 2020). Though, a funding constraint and budget pressures began to mount, there was a rising recognition that the NHS needed to become more money-making and well-organized.

The focus was on equity and right of entry to healthcare services, somewhat than on value for money. Though, over time, the NHS faced rising financial pressures due to factors such as the rising costs of medical technology, ageing population, and increasing patient prospect. One of the key developments that highlighted the significance of value for money in healthcare was the foreword of the NHS and Community Care Act 1990. The Act introduces the concept of an interior market within the NHS, where healthcare provider was required to contend with each other for contracts (Milani and Milani, 2019). The endeavor was to increase competence, reduce costs, and progress the quality of care. This led to the introduction of purchaser-provider split, whereby commission of healthcare services was alienated from the stipulation of services. One key lawmaking growth in this context was the foreword of the NHS and Community Care Act 1990, which introduce the concept of the interior market within the NHS. These destined that healthcare providers were necessary to compete with each other for contracts, and aspire to increase competence and reduce costs.

More in recent times, the Health and Social Care Act 2012 introduce significant changes to the NHS, including the formation of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) accountable for commissioning healthcare services for their local populations. The Act also placed a superior emphasis on the requirement for value for money in healthcare, with a focus on falling waste and improving competence (Faccia and Pandey, 2021). In the situation of healthcare funding constraint and growing demand for services, value for money has turn out to be a more and more significant consideration for healthcare provider and policymakers. This has led to the growth of new approaches to healthcare delivery, such as incorporated care systems and preventive health initiatives, which aim to get better outcomes while reducing costs.

Though, there are also concerns that a narrow focus on cost-effectiveness and competence could have negative consequences for patient care and outcome. It is consequently significant to ensure that the detection of value for money is balanced with an obligation to providing high-quality, patient-centered care.

While it is significant to consider the financial sustainability of healthcare systems, a slight focus on cost-effectiveness and competence could lead to negative consequences for patient care and outcomes (Carlsson‐Wall, et. al. 2022). In several cases, the pursuit of value for money may direct to decision being made exclusively on the basis of cost, somewhat than on what is best for the patient.

For instance, there have been concerns that cost-cutting events could lead to reductions in staffing levels, which could impact the superiority and protection of care. In adding up, there has been instance where decisions about treatment or intervention have been based on their cost-effectiveness, rather than their scientific effectiveness or patient preference.

Additionally, the focus on competence could lead to a fragmented approach to healthcare delivery, where the diverse parts of the system are optimized for their own effectiveness, rather than for the overall quality of care (Balakrishnan, et. al. 2023). This could result in patients receiving incoherent or fragmented care, which may not meet their requirements

It is as a result significant to ensure that the chase of value for money is objective with a commitment to providing high-class, patient-centered care. This means that decision-making should take into account not only the cost-effectiveness of intervention, but also the clinical efficiency, safety, and patient experience.

To accomplish this balance, healthcare provider and policymakers require prioritizing investment in areas that will progress patient outcomes and experience, while also seeking to reduce waste and advance efficiency. This could involve investing in pre-emptive health initiatives, promoting integrated care systems, and improving coordination and communication between diverse parts of the healthcare system (Hall, et. al. 2021). Eventually, a balance between value for money and patient-centered care is critical to ensure that healthcare systems are sustainable, while also deliver high-quality care to patients.

Types of information and data identified from research

Based on the data provided, the following types of information, and data related to the trend in the social care housing sector in England can be recognized:

• Funding trends: This data can offer insights into how financial support levels have changed, and the impact of these changes on the stipulation of social care services. According to a statement by the Health Foundation, endowment for social care in England has decrease by 7% in real terms between 2011 and 2019 (Pritchard, 2022). This has resulted in reduced admittance to social care services for populace with care requirements and augmented pressure on the NHS.
• Demographic trends: a further significant area of consideration is the demographic trends in the social care housing sector in England. This could comprise data on the ageing population, the commonness of chronic conditions, and the number of people requires social care services. According to data from the Office for National Statistics, the amount of the UK population aged 66 and over enlarged from 15.5% in 2010 to 18.4% in 2020. This tendency is predictable to continue, with the number of populace aged 64 and over predictable to boost by 41% between 2019 and 2039.
• Service utilization: It would be necessary to inspect data on the operation of social care services in England. This could comprise data on the amount of citizens receiving care, the types of services provided, and the period of care required (Tuffaha, al. 2019). According to a report by the King's Fund, the numeral of people aged 66 and over access social care services in England decreases from 1.9 million in 2015/16 to 1.4 million in 2018/19. The report highlighted concerns around condensed access to social care services and augmented force on unpaid careers.
• Staffing trends: investigative data on staffing trends within the social care housing division in England would also be educational. This could include data on the numeral of staff qualifications, staff, and staff retention rates. According to a report by Skills for Care, the number of vacancy in the adult social care subdivision in England augmented from 74,000 in 2017 to 121,000 in 2019 (Radaelli, 2023). The report also set up that staff turnover rates were high, with an standard turnover rate of20.8% in 2019.
• Competence measures: To tackle the Government's focus on saving costs and improving competence, it would be significant to inspect data on the success of efficiency measures implement within the social care housing sector in England. This could include data on the impact of technical advancements, the incorporation of health and social care services, and the use of defensive measures (Ghaffarzadegan and Rahmandad, 2020). According to a report by the Health Foundation, funding for social care in England has decrease by 7% in genuine terms connecting 2011 and 2019. This has resulted in concentrated access to social care services for people with care wants and improved pressure on the NHS.
• Quality of care: lastly, to ensure that a focus on cost-effectiveness does not unenthusiastically impact patient care and outcomes, it would be critical to examine data on the superiority of care provided within the social care housing sector in England. A report by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in 2019 found that approximately a quarter of social care services in England did not meet the necessary standards for safety and efficiency (Kaye, al. 2021). The report highlighted concerns around staff training, staffing levels, and the quality of care provide. In 2015, the administration launched the "Better Care Fund" to endorse addition between health and social care services. The fund offer financial incentives for local establishment and NHS organization to work together to get better patient outcomes and decrease hospital admissions
• Financial sustainability: this analysis of social care housing providers could help to recognize potential challenges and notify policy decisions around funding and speculation in the sector. A report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in 2020 found that the social care sector in England faced a financial support gap of £7 billion by 2030, even with the government proposed reform to the funding system. The report highlighted the requirement for additional funding and speculation in the sector to make sure its sustainability.

Investigate the variety and types of data available concerning how ‘health and social care services are delivered

To examine the choice and type of data obtainable in relation to how health and social care services are commissioned and delivered, students could start by looking at data from local authorities, whom are accountable for commissioning and provide social care services in their areas. Some of the data sources one could consider include:

• Cost data: This could include data on the weekly cost of providing that care to diverse service user groups, which includes, people with disabilities, older adults or individuals with mental health requirements. Local authorities may gather data on staffing costs, gear and supplies, and other transparency costs associated with providing care.
• Funding data: This could include information on the source of funding for social care services, which includes local authority budgets, government grants, and contributions from service users (Moynihan et al., 2021). Students could also look at how funding has distorted over time and whether there have been any important shifts in funding models or priorities.
• Utilization data: This could comprise information on the number and type of social care services provided to local inhabitants, as well as data on service user demographics, waiting lists, and service quality metrics. This data could help us understand which service user groups are most in need of support and which services are in the highest demand.
• Performance data: This could include information on key performance indicators for social care services, such as service user satisfaction rates, wait times, and outcomes data. This data could assist in evaluating the value of care being provided and recognizing areas for development.

In addition to these data sources, students could also look at government supplies related to the provision of health and social care services (World Health Organization, 2019). For instance, the government may have strategy or regulations around the provision of infection control measures, personal protective equipment (PPE), and testing for COVID-19. Students could also look at government funding stream for social care services, such as the Better Care Fund, and how this money are owed and monitored. Investigating the variety and type of data obtainable about how health and social care services are delivered could help to appreciate the current state of the sector, recognize areas for development, and develop evidence-based recommendations for how to improve the sustainability and quality of care (Lin and Egerer, 2020).

In the case of the NHS, the government has issued various strategy and regulations related to the condition of health and social care services, chiefly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These guiding principles cover a variety of topics, including:

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): The administration has provided direction on the use of PPE for health and social care employees to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. This direction covers which types of PPE should be used in diverse settings and how to use and organize of PPE securely.
• Infection control measures: The administration has also issued strategy on infection avoidance and control measures in healthcare settings, including events to diminish the risk of spread of COVID-19. These guiding principles cover topics such as hand hygiene, ecological cleaning, and patient placement.
• Testing for COVID-19: The administration has introduced various testing programs for COVID-19, including lateral flow testing, PCR testing, and antibody testing. These tests are used for identifying outbreaks, diagnosing COVID-19, and monitoring the increase of the virus (Johnsson et al. 2019).
• Funding for social care services: The administration provides funding for social care services through the Better Care Fund, which is a combined funding initiative between the NHS and local establishment. The fund is intended to support the mixing of health and social care services and get better outcomes for service users.

Monitoring and evaluation of these guiding principle and funding streams are carried out through various mechanism, such as inspection by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), usual reporting and analysis by NHS Public Health England, and appraisal and evaluation by the section of Health and Social Care. These mechanisms help to make sure that the guidelines and funding streams are being implemented successfully and that they are achieving their proposed outcomes.

Direct payments and funding registered care homes are 2 significant mechanisms for financing health and social care services in England. These are ways of giving people more option and control over the care and support they receive. As a substitute of receiving care services directly from the local authority or NHS, appropriate individuals can decide to receive a direct payment, which they can use to buy their own care and hold up services (Thomas et. al., 2021). This can include services such as help, personal care, domestic equipment and adaptations. The government has set out set of laws around the use of direct payments to make sure they are being used suitably and effectively.

Funding registered care homes is one more important device for financing health and social care services in England. Register care homes provide housing care for people who require 24-hour hold up and assistance. The government provides funding for registered care homes through a variety of mechanisms, such as local authority funding and NHS Continuing Healthcare financial support. These funding streams are used to cover the costs of housing, food, personal care, and support services.

To make sure that direct payments and funding for registered care homes are being used effectively, the administration has put in place various mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation (Powell, et. al. 2020). For instance, local authorities are responsible for monitoring the use of direct payments and ensure that they are being used in accordance with regulations. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is dependable for inspecting registered care homes to make sure that they meet quality and safety standards, and for publishing reports on their findings. In addition, the government carries out regular review and evaluations of these financial support streams to make sure that they are achieve their planned outcomes and to recognize areas for development.

Funding registered and direct payments care homes are 2 significant mechanisms for financing health and social care services in England.

• Direct payments are a means of giving people more option and organizing the care and support they obtain. Instead of receiving care services directly from the local authority or NHS, entitled persons can decide to receive a direct payment, which they can use to buy their own care and hold up services. This can comprise services such as personal care, home help, and tackle and adaptations (Al-Janabi, et. al. 2019). The administration has set out regulations around the use of direct payments to make sure they are being used appropriately and successfully.
• Funding registered care home is another significant mechanism for financing health and social care services in England. Register care homes provide housing care for people who require 24-hour hold up and assistance. The government provides funding for register care homes through various mechanisms, such as local authority funding and NHS Continuing Healthcare funding. These funding streams are used to cover the costs of lodging, food, personal care, and support services.

To ensure that these two registered care homes are being used efficiently, the government has put in place various machinery for monitoring and evaluation. For example, local authorities are responsible for monitoring the use of direct payments and ensuring that they are being used in accordance with regulations (Freitag, et. al. 2021). The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is responsible for inspecting registered care homes to make sure that they meet superiority and safety standards, and for publishing reports on their conclusion. in addition, the government carries out regular reviews and evaluations of these funding streams to make sure that they are achieve their planned outcomes and to identify areas for improvement.

Use of literature and published financial information and comparison of the trends over a period of time

It is significant to focus on using accessible literature and available financial information that is obtainable in the public domain. This can take in reports, white papers, academic papers, and other publications that provide data on the financing and relief of health and social care services in England.

For instance, there are many reports and publications that focus on the use of direct expenses and funding for registered care homes. The government publishes regular information on the allocation and monitoring of funding streams such as the Better Care Fund, which is a joint fund between the NHS and local authorities to hold up the addition of health and social care services. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) also publishes reports on the excellence and safety of care homes, which can offer insights into how financial support is being used in this area.

Furthermore, there are many academic papers and other publications that provide insights into the efficiency and impact of direct payments and financial support for registered care homes (Nolan-Isles, et. al. 2021). These can include evaluation of detailed initiatives or programs, case studies of booming implementations, and reviews of the literature on these topics.

By focusing on obtainable literature and published financial information, research student can construct on existing knowledge and recognize gaps in the present understanding of how health and social care services are funded and delivered in England.

Comparing trend over a period of time can help expand projection and make assumption about future activities in the health and social care sector. By analyzing historical data and trends, researchers can identify patterns and factors that have influenced changes in the sector, and use this data to make prediction about future trends and prospective outcomes.

For instance, a comparison of trends in the use of direct payments for social care services over the last 10–16 years could help to recognize changes in the way that funding for these services has been owed and monitored (Giebel, et. al. 2021). This data could then be used to make assumption about future changes in administration policy related to the use of direct payments, and to forecast the potential impact of these changes on the delivery and finance of social care services in England.

Specific software tools aid in decision making

Excel can be mainly useful in the health and social care sector because it allow researchers and decision-makers to supervise and examine large amounts of data in a structured and well-organized way. For instance, it can be used to create spreadsheet that organizes patient data by medical history, demographics, or clinical outcomes. These spreadsheets can then be analyzed using a variety of Excel's data analysis tools, such as revolve tables or charts, to recognize patterns and trends in the data.

Excel can also be used to examine financial data related to health and social care services. For instance, researchers and decision makers can use Excel to track service operation and cost trends over time, which can be used to recognize areas where cost savings could be understood or to assess the impact of policy changes on service delivery (Kweku et. al. 2020).

Another advantage of using Excel in the health and social care sector is that it provides a reliable and consistent way to supervise and analyze data. This is significant because it allows researchers and decision-makers to contrast data across different providers, regions, or time periods, which can be used to recognize best practices or to appraise the efficiency of interventions.

Figure 1: Monthly Health Management Excel Report

Figure 2: Care home deaths in 2020

Using software tools like Microsoft Excel can be enormously helpful in making data-driven decision in the health and social care division. Excel is an influential data analysis tool that allows users to systematize and influence large amounts of data rapidly and easily. Some exact ways that Excel can aid in decision-making in the health and social care sector include:

• Data organization and management: this allows users to systematize large amounts of data in an obvious and concise way, making it easier to recognize patterns and trends. This can be particularly useful when analyzing data related to patient outcomes, service utilization, or financial performance.
• Data visualization: this includes a variety of graph and chart options, which can be used to imagine data and recognize trends more easily. This can be particularly helpful when presenting data to stakeholders or other decision-makers.
• Statistical analysis: this includes a diversity of statistical analysis tools which can be used to recognize correlations, make prediction, and test hypothesis This can be particularly useful when analyzing data related to clinical outcomes or service operations (Chiaramonti, al. 2021).
• Scenario modeling: this can be used to create "what-if" scenario, which can assist decision-makers in assessing the potential impact of diverse decisions or policy changes. This can be particularly useful when making decisions connected to funding allocation or service delivery.

Using software tools like Excel can help researchers and decision makers in the health and social care sectors create more knowledgeable decision by providing a prearranged and competent way to examine and run large amounts of data.

Figure 3: Local authority spending on social care

Figure 4: Annual per-head spending on social care

Conclusion

In conclusion, the social care housing sector in England has undergone major changes in the last 15 years in terms of finance and priorities. The government's focus on saving expenses and improving competence has led to the completion of various initiatives, which includes personalization of care, sustainability funding, and collaboration with health partners. The use of software tools like Excel can assist researchers and decision-makers in analyzing and running large amounts of data to make more knowledgeable decisions. Nonetheless, there are still obstacles that must be dealt with, such as the rising demand for social care services and the requirement for adequate finance to back up the sector. To continue providing high-quality social care services to those who need them while simultaneously resolving the sector's funding crisis, the government and other partners must continue to collaborate.

References

Akseer, N., Kandru, G., Keats, E.C. and Bhutta, Z.A., 2020. COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation strategies: implications for maternal and child health and nutrition.The American journal of clinical nutrition,112(2), pp.251-256.

Alison Holt & Ben Butcher, 2021. Annual per head spending on social care. [Online]. [Available on]. :<https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50377846>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].

Alison Holt & Ben Butcher, 2021. Care home deaths in 2020. [Online]. [Available on]. :<https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50377846>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].

Alison Holt & Ben Butcher, 2021. Local authority spending on social care. [Online]. [Available on]. :<https://www.bbc.com/news/health-50377846>. [Assessed on 19/05/2023].

Al-Janabi, H., McLoughlin, C., Oyebode, J., Efstathiou, N. and Calvert, M., 2019. Six mechanisms behind carer wellbeing effects: A qualitative study of healthcare delivery.Social Science & Medicine,235, p.112382.

Balakrishnan, K., El-Said, A.T. and Lazar, Z., 2023.Competition versus Sole Sourcing in Defence Procurement What are the Factors that Determine Tendering Methods in Government Contracting for Delivering ‘Value for Money’?. Acquisition Research Program.

Blumenthal, D., Fowler, E.J., Abrams, M. and Collins, S.R., 2020. Covid-19—implications for the health care system.New England Journal of Medicine,383(15), pp.1483-1488.

Cadersaib, B.Z., Ahku, Y., Sahib-Kaudeer, N.G., Khan, M.H.M. and Gobin, B., 2020, November. A review of skills relevant to enterprise resource planning implementation projects. In2020 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS)(pp. 172-177). IEEE.

Carlsson‐Wall, M., Goretzki, L., Hofstedt, J., Kraus, K. and Nilsson, C.J., 2022. Exploring the implications of cloud‐based enterprise resource planning systems for public sector management accountants.Financial accountability & management,38(2), pp.177-201.

Chiaramonti, D., Talluri, G., Scarlat, N. and Prussi, M., 2021. The challenge of forecasting the role of biofuel in EU transport decarbonisation at 2050: A meta-analysis review of published scenarios.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,139, p.110715.

Etuzy ltd, 2018. Monthly Health Management Excel Report, (Online). <https://www.allbusinesstemplates.com/template/WM79U/monthly-health-management-excel-report/> accessed on 15.05.2023

Faccia, A. and Pandey, V., 2021, November. Business planning and big data, budget modelling upgrade through data science. In2021 the 6th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering(pp. 21-25).

Freitag, C., Berners-Lee, M., Widdicks, K., Knowles, B., Blair, G. and Friday, A., 2021. The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.02622.

Ghaffarzadegan, N. and Rahmandad, H., 2020. Simulation‐based estimation of the early spread of COVID‐19 in Iran: actual versus confirmed cases.System Dynamics Review,36(1), pp.101-129.

Giebel, C., Pulford, D., Cooper, C., Lord, K., Shenton, J., Cannon, J., Shaw, L., Tetlow, H., Limbert, S., Callaghan, S. and Whittington, R., 2021. COVID-19-related social support service closures and mental well-being in older adults and those affected by dementia: a UK longitudinal survey.BMJ open,11(1), p.e045889.

Hall, R., Ansley, L., Connolly, P., Loonat, S., Patel, K. and Whitham, B., 2021. Struggling for the anti-racist university: learning from an institution-wide response to curriculum decolonisation.Teaching in Higher Education,26(7-8), pp.902-919.

Heinzerling, A., Stuckey, M.J., Scheuer, T., Xu, K., Perkins, K.M., Resseger, H., Magill, S., Verani, J.R., Jain, S., Acosta, M. and Epson, E., 2020. Transmission of COVID-19 to health care personnel during exposures to a hospitalized patient—Solano County, California, February 2020.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,69(15), p.472.

Honig, B. and Samuelsson, M., 2021. Business planning by intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs under environmental uncertainty and institutional pressure.Technovation,99, p.102124.

Johnsson, G., Kerslake, R. and Crook, S., 2019. Delivering allied health services to regional and remote participants on the autism spectrum via video-conferencing technology: lessons learned.Rural and Remote Health,19(3).

Kaye, A.D., Okeagu, C.N., Pham, A.D., Silva, R.A., Hurley, J.J., Arron, B.L., Sarfraz, N., Lee, H.N., Ghali, G.E., Gamble, J.W. and Liu, H., 2021. Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives.Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology,35(3), pp.293-306.

Kweku, M., Amu, H., Awolu, A., Adjuik, M., Ayanore, M.A., Manu, E., Tarkang, E.E., Komesuor, J., Asalu, G.A., Aku, F.Y. and Kugbey, N., 2020. Community-based health planning and services plus programme in Ghana: a qualitative study with stakeholders in two systems learning districts on improving the implementation of primary health care.PLoS One,15(1), p.e0226808.

Lin, B.B. and Egerer, M.H., 2020. Global social and environmental change drives the management and delivery of ecosystem services from urban gardens: A case study from Central Coast, California.Global Environmental Change,60, p.102006.

Milani, F. and Milani, F., 2019. Plan Stakeholder Engagement.Digital Business Analysis, pp.127-142.

Moreno, C., Wykes, T., Galderisi, S., Nordentoft, M., Crossley, N., Jones, N., Cannon, M., Correll, C.U., Byrne, L., Carr, S. and Chen, E.Y., 2020. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.The lancet psychiatry,7(9), pp.813-824.

Moynihan, R., Sanders, S., Michaleff, Z.A., Scott, A.M., Clark, J., To, E.J., Jones, M., Kitchener, E., Fox, M., Johansson, M. and Lang, E., 2021. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.BMJ open,11(3), p.e045343.

Nolan-Isles, D., Macniven, R., Hunter, K., Gwynn, J., Lincoln, M., Moir, R., Dimitropoulos, Y., Taylor, D., Agius, T., Finlayson, H. and Martin, R., 2021. Enablers and barriers to accessing healthcare services for Aboriginal people in New South Wales, Australia.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(6), p.3014.

Powell, B.J., Haley, A.D., Patel, S.V., Amaya-Jackson, L., Glienke, B., Blythe, M., Lengnick-Hall, R., McCrary, S., Beidas, R.S., Lewis, C.C. and Aarons, G.A., 2020. Improving the implementation and sustainment of evidence-based practices in community mental health organizations: a study protocol for a matched-pair cluster randomized pilot study of the Collaborative Organizational Approach to Selecting and Tailoring Implementation Strategies (COAST-IS).Implementation science communications,1, pp.1-13.

Pritchard, R., 2022.Transformation through Participation and Accountability: Exploring alternative approaches to Value for Money in Development Assistance(Doctoral dissertation, Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington).

Radaelli, C.M., 2023. Occupy the semantic space! Opening up the language of better regulation.Journal of European Public Policy, pp.1-24.

Shpak, N., Naychuk-Khrushch, M., Kohut, U., Honchar, M. and Sroka, W., 2020. THE USAGE OF MODERN INSTRUMENTS OF BUSINESS PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FOR SMALL ENTERPRISES: A CASE STUDY ANALYSIS.Central European Business Review,9(1).

Thomas, N., McDonald, C., de Boer, K., Brand, R.M., Nedeljkovic, M. and Seabrook, L., 2021. Review of the current empirical literature on using videoconferencing to deliver individual psychotherapies to adults with mental health problems.Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice,94(3), pp.854-883.

Tuffaha, H.W., Aitken, J., Chambers, S. and Scuffham, P.A., 2019. A framework to prioritise health research proposals for funding: integrating value for money.Applied Health Economics and Health Policy,17(6), pp.761-770.

World Health Organization, 2019. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in health-care facilities in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO practical toolkit.

World Health Organization, 2020.Infection prevention and control guidance for long-term care facilities in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 21 March 2020(No. WHO/2019-nCoV/IPC_long_term_care/2020.1). World Health Organization.