Transforming Healthcare Through Evidence-Based Research Practices Case Study

Advancing Patient Care with Systematic Literature Review Methods

Introduction

This study will discuss about how the effective delivery of personalized care can decrease the preventable use of health services and advance patients’ lives. This research will provide the opportunity to explore the nature of the challenge to a view of improving the superiority of care in the care setting by using the Pearson perform theme by improving services by connecting people. The report will discuss about the role of research for evidence-based practice in health and community care (Borst, 2019). Key features of the report will highlight on literature relating to a research topic towards development in care practice. The main objective of the report is to observe the value of the literature review procedure in influence optimistic change in health and communal care practice.

LO1 Activity 1: Part A Reflective essay in a booklet

Describe the process and purpose of research and how that facilitate evidence based practice

Research play a vital role in evidence-based practice in fitness and social care by providing reliable and advanced information that can guide decision-making, policy development, and service delivery (Chiappelli, 2019). By using evidence-based practice, health and social care practitioners can provide high-quality care that is tailored to the needs and preferences of their clients.

Explain the qualities and skills that are necessary to carry out a literature review

Research helps to establish the effectiveness of different treatments and interventions, identify risk factors for particular health conditions, and evaluate the impact of different policies and programs. By using the findings from research studies, practitioners can make informed decision about the best course of achievement for their clients, based on the latest available evidence.

Research also helps to identify areas where further research is needed, allowing practitioners and policymakers to prioritize research efforts and allocate resources more effectively (Bonner, et. al. 2021). By continuously evaluating and updating their practices based on the latest research findings, health and social care practitioners can develop the quality and effectiveness of the care they provide.

Examine your own current knowledge and skills in being able to carry out a literature review

To conduct a literature review, research should have a strong foundation in research methodology, including an understanding of how to identify and search relevant databases, how to critically appraise research articles, and how to synthesize the findings from multiple studies (Vehko, et. al. 2019. It is also important to have a good understanding of the specific topic or area of interest that you are reviewing, as well as knowledge of the broader context of health and social care.

Additionally, researcher should have strong writing and communication skills to effectively convey the findings of the literature review (Scoones, et. al. 2020). This may include the ability to organize information in a clear and concise manner, to summarize complex information in a way that is understandable to a non-expert audience, and to present the findings in a well-structured and persuasive manner.

Overall, carrying out a literature review in health and social care require a variety of skills and knowledge, including research methodology, subject matter expertise, and effective communication. It is an ongoing process that requires continuous learning and development to stay up-to-date with the latest research findings and best practices in evidence-based practice. The skills required conducting ethical research that can absolutely influence put into practice and the provision of healthcare and carry services include:

• Understanding of ethical principles: Researchers should have a good understanding of ethical principles, including admiration for persons, beneficence, and fairness, and how they apply to the research process (Brown, al. 2021). They should be able to identify potential moral issues that may arise during the research process and take steps to address them appropriately.
• Knowledge of research methodology: Researchers should have a good understanding of research methodology and design to ensure that the research is conducted in a way that is scientifically rigorous and will produce reliable and valid results (Kwan, al. 2020).
• Ability to obtain informed consent: Researchers should be skilled in obtaining informed consent from study participants, ensure that participants appreciate the purpose of the research, the risks and benefits of participation, and their rights as participants.

LO2 Activity 1: Part B Literature review in booklet

Literature review on ensuring individuals are aware of their options regarding treatment or interventions

The issue of individual choice in healthcare and social care has become increasingly important in recent years, with a growing emphasis on person-centered care and the importance of respecting individual preferences and autonomy. This literature review aims to explore the topic of individual choice in healthcare and social care, specifically focusing on the importance of ensuring that individuals are aware of their options regarding treatment or interventions.

• Literature Review

Davis, 2018 consent and enduring choice in healthcare to examines the importance of knowledgeable consent and patient choice in healthcare, and the ethical implications of failing to provide individuals with adequate information about their options (Navarro, et. al. 2021). The author argues that healthcare providers have an obligation to ensure that individuals are fully informed about the risks and benefits of different treatments or interventions, and to respect their preferences and values when making treatment decisions.

Explain the outcome of literature search that summarize current knowledge about the research topic

This article provides a conceptual framework for patient-centered care, which emphasizes the importance of involving patients in their own care and ensuring that their preferences and values are respected. This article argues that evidence-based medicine should be practiced in a way that incorporates patient preferences and values, rather than relying solely on clinical evidence (Dineen, et. al. 2019). The authors suggest that clinical practice guidelines should be developed in a way that allows for individualized decision-making and takes into account the unique needs and preferences of each patient.

Evaluate the consistency and legitimacy of own literature review

The reliability of a literature review refers to the consistency and accuracy of the findings presented. To ensure the reliability of a literature review, it is significant to use a rigorous and systematic approach to searching for and selecting relevant studies, as well as to critically evaluate the quality of the evidence presented. In addition, it is important to clearly document the search process and methods used to select and evaluate studies to increase the transparency and reproducibility of the review.

The validity of a literature review refers to the extent to which the findings accurately reflect the current state of knowledge on the topic being reviewed. To ensure the validity of a literature review, it is important to use a comprehensive and up-to-date search strategy, including both published and unpublished sources, to ensure that all relevant studies are identified (Ashish, et. al. 2020).

Conducting a reliable and valid literature review requires a rigorous and systematic approach to searching for and selecting relevant studies, as well as a critical evaluation of the quality and relevance of the evidence presented (Sperling, 2021). It is also important to document the search process and methods used to ensure transparency and reproducibility, and to synthesize the findings in a clear and transparent manner that accurately reflects the current state of knowledge on the topic being reviewed.

Critically evaluate the viability of own project proposal

To assess the viability of a project proposal, it is significant to consider whether the proposed project is feasible, relevant, and likely to have a positive impact on practice in the field of health and social care. This requires careful consideration of the research question or problem being addressed, the methods proposed to address the question and the potential implications of the research for practice.

In relation to evidence-based practice in social care and health, it is important to consider whether the proposed project is based on a rigorous and comprehensive literature review that provides a clear rationale for the research question being addressed. Additionally, it is significant to reflect on whether the proposed project uses appropriate methods to address the research question, such as a randomized controlled trial or qualitative study, and whether these methods are feasible given the resources and constraints of the project.

Furthermore, it is important to consider whether the proposed project is relevant to current issues and priorities in the field of social care and health, and whether it has the potential to have a positive impact on practice (Labrague, et. al. 2020). This requires a careful consideration of the potential implications of the research for policy and practice, as well as the potential limitations and ethical implications of the research.

To evaluate the viability of a project suggestion in relation to the literature review on evidence-based practice in health and social care, it is important to consider whether the proposed project is based on a rigorous and comprehensive literature review, uses appropriate methods, and has the potential to have a positive impact on practice.

Logbook

LO4 Activity 3: Summary Project Proposal

Project title	Fundamentals of Evidence-Based Practice
Problem that the proposed project will aim to address	The issue of individual choice in healthcare and social care has become increasingly important in recent years, with a growing emphasis on person-centred care and the importance of respecting individual preferences and autonomy (Aveyard and Sharp, 2017).
The current state differs from the deal.	This literature review aims to explore the topic of individual choice in healthcare and social care, specifically focusing on the importance of ensuring that individuals are aware of their options regarding treatment or interventions.
There is currently no acceptable alternative that patients, service users and clients can take advantage of	Research helps to establish the effectiveness of different treatments and interventions, identify risk factors for particular health conditions, and evaluate the impact of different policies and programs (Dziegielewski and Holliman, 2019)
What is the issue I need to address?	The personal research process involves analyzing, synthesizing and evaluating information from a range of sources. This process can develop critical thinking skills, which are essential for problem-solving and decision-making in the workplace.
Why is this problem important?	It is an ongoing process that requires continuous learning and development to stay up-to-date with the latest research findings and best practices in evidence-based practice (Xiang, et.al 2018).
How will the intervention I propose help to solve the problem?	The personal research process can have a significant impact on an individual's learning and practice in the workplace. It can develop critical thinking skills, enhance knowledge, encourage innovation, improve communication skills, and foster a culture of continuous learning.
Short summary (one or two sentences)	By undertaking personal research, individuals can stay up-to-date with current research and best practices in their field, leading to better performance and improved outcomes (Dickinson, and O’Flynn, 2016).
Project introduction, background and context	This study will discuss about how the effective delivery of personalized care can decrease the preventable use of health services and advance patients’ lives. This research will provide the opportunity to explore the nature of the challenge to a view of improving the superiority of care in the care setting by using the Pearson perform theme by improving services by connecting people.
Research Questions/Aims, objectives and outcomes 50w	The report has discussed about the role of research for evidence-based practice in health and community care. Key features of the report will highlight on literature relating to a research topic towards development in care practice. The main objective of the report is to observe the value of the literature review procedure in influence optimistic change in health and communal care practice.
Ethical considerations	The personal research process involves analyzing, synthesizing and evaluating information from a range of sources. This process can develop critical thinking skills, which are essential for problem-solving and decision-making in the workplace.
Links to professionalism	Personal research can foster a culture of continuous learning in the workplace, where individuals are encouraged to seek out new information and ideas to improve their practice. This can help organizations to stay competitive and adapt to changes in the external environment.
Review of knowledge and information	Evaluating journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement requires a combination of self-reflection, seeking feedback from others, comparing practice or service delivery to industry standards, and monitoring and evaluating outcomes.
Method	To evaluate the viability of a project suggestion in relation to the literature review on evidence-based practice in health and social care, it is important to consider whether the proposed project is based on a rigorous and comprehensive literature review, uses appropriate methods, and has the potential to have a positive impact on practice (Surr, et.al 2017).

LO4 Activity 4: Performance review

Describe diverse ways in which the literature review influence social care practice and evidence based health

A literature review is a significant component of social care and evidence-based health practice as it provides a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on a particular topic or question. The literature review can influence evidence-based practice in several ways, including:

• Identifying knowledge gaps: A literature review can highlight areas where research is lacking, which can guide the development of new research questions and priorities. This can guide to the development of new intervention or strategies to progress health and social care practice.
• Identifying best practices: A literature review can help to identify best practices and interventions that have been shown to be effective in improving health outcomes or social care practices (Bojdani, al. 2020). This information can be used to inform the development of evidence-based guidelines and protocols to guide clinical practice.
• Informing decision-making: A literature review can offer evidence to support decision-making in social care and health practice. This can be particularly important in situations where there is uncertainty or controversy surrounding a particular issue or intervention.
• Improving the quality of research: A literature review can help to identify areas where research methodology can be improved, leading to more rigorous and robust studies in the future. This can help to improve the quality of evidence available to inform health and social care practice.
• Raising awareness: A literature review can raise awareness of important issues in health and social care practice, such as health disparities, social determinants of health, or emerging health threats. This can help to increase awareness and advocacy for addressing these issues in clinical practice and policy.

Explain how recent research has had an optimistic impact on current practice to develop service delivery

• Implementation of evidence-based guidelines: these are developed based on rigorous research findings and are intended to guide clinical practice. For example, the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of stroke has led to improved outcomes and reduced mortality rates.
• Introduction of new interventions: Research can lead to the growth of new interventions and strategy to improve health and social care practice. For example, recent research has lead to the growth of new intervention to reduce hospital readmissions, such as telehealth and remote monitoring programs.
• Improvements in patient safety: Research can identify areas where patient safety can be improved and lead to the development of new safety measures (Vollmer, al. 2020). For example, research on hand hygiene has led to the introduction of hand hygiene programs in healthcare settings, which have been shown to reduce the spread of infection.
• Increased focus on patient-centred concern: Research has led to an augmented focus on patient-centred care, which involves engaging patients and service users in decisions about their care and treatment. This approach has been exposed to get better patient approval and outcomes.
• Adoption of new technologies: Research has led to the development of new technologies, such as mobile health applications and electronic health records, which have the potential to get better service delivery and patient outcomes.

Recent investigate has had a positive impact on present practice in health and social care, foremost to improvement in service delivery and better outcomes for patients and service users. The adoption of evidence-based guidelines, introduction of new interventions, improvements in patient safety, increased focus on patient-centered care, and adoption of new technologies are some examples of how recent research has influenced and improved service delivery.

Analyze how the individual research procedure has an impact on own knowledge and perform in the place of work

Undertaking personal research can have a significant impact on an individual's knowledge and perform in the workplace. Here are some ways in which the personal research process can have an impact:

• Develops critical thinking skills: The personal research process involves analyzing, synthesizing and evaluating information from a range of sources. This process can develop critical thinking skills, which are essential for problem-solving and decision-making in the workplace.
• Enhances knowledge: Personal research can help individuals to gain a deeper understanding of a particular topic or issue. This can improve their knowledge and competence in the workplace, leading to better decision-making and more effective performance.
• Encourages innovation: Personal research can inspire individuals to think outside the box and come up with innovative solutions to problems in the workplace (Molina-Mula and Gallo-Estrada, 2020). This can lead to the development of new ideas and approaches that can improve service delivery and productivity.
• Improves communication skills: Personal research often involves sharing findings and insights with others, either through written reports or presentations. This can improve an individual's communication skills, helping them to convey complex information in a clear and concise manner.
• Fosters a culture of continuous learning: Personal research can foster a culture of continuous learning in the workplace, where individuals are encouraged to seek out new information and ideas to improve their practice. This can help organizations to stay competitive and adapt to changes in the external environment.

Assess own journey towards causal to improvement and innovation

1. Reflection on personal growth: One way to evaluate my own journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement is to reflect on my personal growth in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards evidence-based practice. This can include reflecting on the research you have conducted, the changes I have made to my practice or service delivery, and the impact I have had on patient or service user outcomes.
2. Feedback from colleagues and patients or service users: Another way to evaluate my journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement is to seek feedback from my colleagues and patients or service users. This can include feedback on my communication skills, ability to work collaboratively, and the impact of my interventions on patient or service user outcomes.
3. Comparison with industry standards: I can also evaluate your journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement by comparing my practice or service delivery with industry standards and best practices. This can include reviewing evidence-based guidelines and research to identify areas where I can improve your practice or service delivery.
4. Monitoring and evaluation of outcomes: Finally, I can evaluate my journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement by monitoring and evaluating outcomes (Malterud and Elvbakken, 2020). This can include collecting data on patient or service user outcomes before and after implementing an intervention, and analyzing this data to identify the impact of my interventions on improving service delivery.

Conclusion

The personal research process can have a significant impact on an individual's learning and practice in the workplace. It can develop critical thinking skills, enhance knowledge, encourage innovation, improve communication skills, and foster a culture of continuous learning. By undertaking personal research, individuals can stay up-to-date with current research and best practices in their field, leading to better performance and improved outcomes.

Evaluating journey towards contributing to innovation and improvement requires a combination of self-reflection, seeking feedback from others, comparing practice or service delivery to industry standards, and monitoring and evaluating outcomes. It can guide the development of new research questions and priorities, identify best practices, inform decision-making, improve the quality of research, and raise awareness of important issues in health and social care practice.

References

Ashish, K.C., Gurung, R., Kinney, M.V., Sunny, A.K., Moinuddin, M., Basnet, O., Paudel, P., Bhattarai, P., Subedi, K., Shrestha, M.P. and Lawn, J.E., 2020. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study. The lancet Global health, 8(10), pp.e1273-e1281.

Aveyard, H. and Sharp, P., 2017. EBOOK: A Beginners Guide to Evidence Based Practice in Health and Social Care. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Bojdani, E., Rajagopalan, A., Chen, A., Gearin, P., Olcott, W., Shankar, V., Cloutier, A., Solomon, H., Naqvi, N.Z., Batty, N. and Festin, F.E.D., 2020. COVID-19 pandemic: impact on psychiatric care in the United States. Psychiatry research, 289, p.113069.

Bonner, C., Trevena, L.J., Gaissmaier, W., Han, P.K., Okan, Y., Ozanne, E., Peters, E., Timmermans, D. and Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., 2021. Current best practice for presenting probabilities in patient decision aids: fundamental principles. Medical Decision Making, 41(7), pp.821-833.

Borst, M.J., 2019. 2—Evidence-Based Practice: The Basic Tools. Cooper’s Fundamentals of Hand Therapy, 3rd ed.; Wietlisbach, CM, Ed, pp.15-20.

Brown, S., Opitz, M.C., Peebles, A.I., Sharpe, H., Duffy, F. and Newman, E., 2021. A qualitative exploration of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with eating disorders in the UK. Appetite, 156, p.104977.

Chiappelli, F., 2019. Evidence-based dentistry: two decades and beyond. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 19(1), pp.7-16.

Dickinson, H. and O’Flynn, J., 2016. Evaluating outcomes in health and social care. Policy Press.

Dineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K. and Benrimoj, S.I., 2019. Helping patients help themselves: a systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice. PloS one, 14(8), p.e0220116.

Drisko, J.W. and Grady, M.D., 2019. Evidence-based practice in clinical social work. Springer.

Dziegielewski, S.F. and Holliman, D.C., 2019. The changing face of health care social work: Opportunities and challenges for professional practice.

Kwan, J.L., Lo, L., Ferguson, J., Goldberg, H., Diaz-Martinez, J.P., Tomlinson, G., Grimshaw, J.M. and Shojania, K.G., 2020. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Bmj, 370.

Labrague, L.J., Nwafor, C.E. and Tsaras, K., 2020. Influence of toxic and transformational leadership practices on nurses' job satisfaction, job stress, absenteeism and turnover intention: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(5), pp.1104-1113.

Malterud, K. and Elvbakken, K.T., 2020. Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: a systematic review of outcomes and experiences. Scandinavian journal of public health, 48(6), pp.617-628.

Molina-Mula, J. and Gallo-Estrada, J., 2020. Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), p.835.

Navarro, S., Ochoa, C.Y., Chan, E., Du, S. and Farias, A.J., 2021. Will improvements in patient experience with care impact clinical and quality of care outcomes?: a systematic review. Medical Care, 59(9), pp.843-856.

Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Ely, A., Olsson, P., Pereira, L., Priya, R. and Van Zwanenberg, P., 2020. Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, pp.65-75.

Sperling, D., 2021. Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Ethics, 28(1), pp.9-22.

Surr, C.A., Gates, C., Irving, D., Oyebode, J., Smith, S.J., Parveen, S., Drury, M. and Dennison, A., 2017. Effective dementia education and training for the health and social care workforce: a systematic review of the literature. Review of educational research, 87(5), pp.966-1002.

Vehko, T., Hyppönen, H., Puttonen, S., Kujala, S., Ketola, E., Tuukkanen, J., Aalto, A.M. and Heponiemi, T., 2019. Experienced time pressure and stress: electronic health records usability and information technology competence play a role. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 19, pp.1-9.

Vollmer, S., Mateen, B.A., Bohner, G., Király, F.J., Ghani, R., Jonsson, P., Cumbers, S., Jonas, A., McAllister, K.S., Myles, P. and Grainger, D., 2020. Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit: 20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness. bmj, 368.

Xiang, X., Robinson-Lane, S.G., Rosenberg, W. and Alvarez, R., 2018. Implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice in health care: The Bridge Model experience. Journal of gerontological social work, 61(3), pp.280-294.